H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Martina Navratilova vs Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy H2H: 4-0

Martina Navratilova holds a 4–0 lead over Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Martina Navratilova leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Martina Navratilova won the 1991 Eastbourne fourth round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Navratilova
USA Age 69 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 21, 1991* Eastbourne WTA 250 R16 Grass Martina Navratilova #4 6-1 6-2 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #59 Match data
Jun 15, 1991* Birmingham WTA 250 SF Grass Martina Navratilova #4 6-3 6-2 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #82 Match data
Nov 2, 1989* Worcester WTA 250 R32 Carpet Martina Navratilova #2 6-2 6-1 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #79 Match data
Oct 14, 1988* Filderstadt WTA 250 R16 Carpet Martina Navratilova #2 6-0 6-2 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #44 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Martina Navratilova #395 #1 290 2,664 1,427 227 86.3% 18 8 8 15 120 168
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 295 220 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Navratilova Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 1 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0
16 1973 20–17 54.1% — 1,761 0 2 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0
17 1974 39–20 66.1% — 1,975 0 4 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,689 0 0
18 1975 81–21 79.4% — 2,218 0 7 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,603 0 0
19 1976 41–16 71.9% — 2,153 0 9 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,677 0 0
20 1977 67–15 81.7% — 2,243 0 15 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1
21 1978 78–9 89.7% — 2,420 1 26 1992 30–20 60.0% #33 1,818 0 2
22 1979 91–12 88.3% — 2,428 2 36 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,789 0 3
23 1980 86–12 87.8% — 2,344 2 47 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,885 0 3
24 1981 90–15 85.7% — 2,407 3 57 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,970 0 5
25 1982 85–3 96.6% — 2,521 5 72 1996 35–18 66.0% #12 1,908 0 6
26 1983 84–1 98.8% — 2,622 8 88 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,855 0 7
27 1984 78–2 97.5% #1 2,633 11 101 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,673 0 7
28 1985 84–5 94.4% #1 2,583 13 113 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,651 0 7
29 1986 84–3 96.6% #1 2,626 15 126 — — — — — — —
30 1987 56–8 87.5% #2 2,523 17 130 — — — — — — —
31 1988 70–7 90.9% #2 2,452 17 139 — — — — — — —
32 1989 68–8 89.5% #2 2,393 17 147 — — — — — — —
33 1990 52–7 88.1% #3 2,306 18 153 — — — — — — —
34 1991 53–9 85.5% #4 2,316 18 158 — — — — — — —
35 1992 38–8 82.6% #5 2,326 18 162 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7
36 1993 46–8 85.2% #3 2,264 18 167 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7
37 1994 33–14 70.2% #8 2,073 18 168 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7
45 2002 1–1 50.0% — 2,051 18 168 — — — — — — —
47 2004 1–4 20.0% #388 1,940 18 168 — — — — — — —
48 2005 0–1 0.0% #395 1,910 18 168 — — — — — — —