H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Martina Navratilova vs Camille Benjamin H2H: 4-0

Martina Navratilova holds a 4–0 lead over Camille Benjamin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Martina Navratilova leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Martina Navratilova won the 1990 Eastbourne second round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Navratilova
USA Age 69 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Camille Benjamin
USA Age 60 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 20, 1990* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Martina Navratilova #2 6-2 6-1 Camille Benjamin #116 Match data
Feb 11, 1988* Dallas WTA 250 R32 Hard Martina Navratilova #2 6-0 6-1 Camille Benjamin #85 Match data
Apr 23, 1987* Houston WTA 250 R32 Clay Martina Navratilova #1 6-2 6-1 Camille Benjamin #74 Match data
Jan 18, 1987* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Grass Martina Navratilova #1 6-2 6-1 Camille Benjamin #78 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Martina Navratilova #395 #1 290 2,664 1,427 227 86.3% 18 8 8 15 120 168
Camille Benjamin #1,000 #27 13 1,834 177 223 44.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Navratilova Camille Benjamin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1973 20–17 54.1% — 1,761 0 2 1982 21–14 60.0% — 1,690 0 0
17 1974 39–20 66.1% — 1,975 0 4 1983 22–25 46.8% — 1,715 0 0
18 1975 81–21 79.4% — 2,218 0 7 1984 28–27 50.9% #33 1,774 0 0
19 1976 41–16 71.9% — 2,153 0 9 1985 22–29 43.1% #62 1,632 0 0
20 1977 67–15 81.7% — 2,243 0 15 1986 19–26 42.2% #79 1,609 0 0
21 1978 78–9 89.7% — 2,420 1 26 1987 23–24 48.9% #67 1,654 0 0
22 1979 91–12 88.3% — 2,428 2 36 1988 14–23 37.8% #91 1,601 0 0
23 1980 86–12 87.8% — 2,344 2 47 1989 14–20 41.2% #92 1,652 0 0
24 1981 90–15 85.7% — 2,407 3 57 1990 10–18 35.7% #136 1,620 0 0
25 1982 85–3 96.6% — 2,521 5 72 1991 2–8 20.0% #225 1,560 0 0
26 1983 84–1 98.8% — 2,622 8 88 1992 1–5 16.7% #251 1,527 0 0
27 1984 78–2 97.5% #1 2,633 11 101 1993 1–3 25.0% #276 1,516 0 0
28 1985 84–5 94.4% #1 2,583 13 113 1994 0–1 0.0% #251 1,503 0 0
29 1986 84–3 96.6% #1 2,626 15 126 — — — — — — —
30 1987 56–8 87.5% #2 2,523 17 130 — — — — — — —
31 1988 70–7 90.9% #2 2,452 17 139 — — — — — — —
32 1989 68–8 89.5% #2 2,393 17 147 — — — — — — —
33 1990 52–7 88.1% #3 2,306 18 153 — — — — — — —
34 1991 53–9 85.5% #4 2,316 18 158 — — — — — — —
35 1992 38–8 82.6% #5 2,326 18 162 — — — — — — —
36 1993 46–8 85.2% #3 2,264 18 167 — — — — — — —
37 1994 33–14 70.2% #8 2,073 18 168 — — — — — — —
45 2002 1–1 50.0% — 2,051 18 168 — — — — — — —
47 2004 1–4 20.0% #388 1,940 18 168 — — — — — — —
48 2005 0–1 0.0% #395 1,910 18 168 — — — — — — —