H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Martina Navratilova vs Catherine Tanvier H2H: 7-0

Martina Navratilova holds a 7–0 lead over Catherine Tanvier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Martina Navratilova leads 4–0 on clay and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Martina Navratilova won the 1987 Roland Garros first round 6-3 7-6(7).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Navratilova
USA Age 69 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
7 – 0
7 main draw meetings
Catherine Tanvier
FRA Age 61 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 27, 1987* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Martina Navratilova #1 6-3 7-6(7) Catherine Tanvier #32 Match data
Jun 18, 1986* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Martina Navratilova #1 6-1 6-3 Catherine Tanvier #61 Match data
May 16, 1986* Berlin WTA 500 R16 Clay Martina Navratilova #1 6-3 7-6 Catherine Tanvier #57 Match data
Jun 2, 1985* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Martina Navratilova #1 6-0 6-0 Catherine Tanvier #30 Match data
Apr 21, 1984* Amelia Island WTA 250 QF Clay Martina Navratilova #1 7-6 6-4 Catherine Tanvier #23 Match data
Oct 30, 1983* Filderstadt WTA 250 F Carpet Martina Navratilova 6-1 6-2 Catherine Tanvier Match data
Oct 22, 1982* Filderstadt WTA 250 R16 Carpet Martina Navratilova 6-3 6-2 Catherine Tanvier Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Martina Navratilova #395 #1 290 2,664 1,427 227 86.3% 18 8 8 15 120 168
Catherine Tanvier #752 #20 22 1,877 161 179 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Navratilova Catherine Tanvier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 1 1980 4–2 66.7% — 1,545 0 0
16 1973 20–17 54.1% — 1,761 0 2 1981 6–14 30.0% — 1,540 0 0
17 1974 39–20 66.1% — 1,975 0 4 1982 23–19 54.8% — 1,791 0 0
18 1975 81–21 79.4% — 2,218 0 7 1983 17–16 51.5% — 1,824 0 0
19 1976 41–16 71.9% — 2,153 0 9 1984 21–18 53.8% #30 1,777 0 0
20 1977 67–15 81.7% — 2,243 0 15 1985 18–16 52.9% #39 1,775 0 0
21 1978 78–9 89.7% — 2,420 1 26 1986 19–17 52.8% #37 1,825 0 0
22 1979 91–12 88.3% — 2,428 2 36 1987 10–19 34.5% #96 1,618 0 0
23 1980 86–12 87.8% — 2,344 2 47 1988 9–16 36.0% #77 1,602 0 0
24 1981 90–15 85.7% — 2,407 3 57 1989 12–12 50.0% #65 1,673 0 0
25 1982 85–3 96.6% — 2,521 5 72 1990 9–11 45.0% #99 1,658 0 0
26 1983 84–1 98.8% — 2,622 8 88 1991 7–10 41.2% #104 1,603 0 0
27 1984 78–2 97.5% #1 2,633 11 101 1992 6–7 46.2% #105 1,614 0 0
28 1985 84–5 94.4% #1 2,583 13 113 1993 0–2 0.0% #543 1,578 0 0
29 1986 84–3 96.6% #1 2,626 15 126 — — — — — — —
30 1987 56–8 87.5% #2 2,523 17 130 — — — — — — —
31 1988 70–7 90.9% #2 2,452 17 139 — — — — — — —
32 1989 68–8 89.5% #2 2,393 17 147 — — — — — — —
33 1990 52–7 88.1% #3 2,306 18 153 — — — — — — —
34 1991 53–9 85.5% #4 2,316 18 158 — — — — — — —
35 1992 38–8 82.6% #5 2,326 18 162 — — — — — — —
36 1993 46–8 85.2% #3 2,264 18 167 — — — — — — —
37 1994 33–14 70.2% #8 2,073 18 168 — — — — — — —
45 2002 1–1 50.0% — 2,051 18 168 — — — — — — —
47 2004 1–4 20.0% #388 1,940 18 168 — — — — — — —
48 2005 0–1 0.0% #395 1,910 18 168 — — — — — — —