H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Martina Navratilova holds a 1–0 lead over Dee Ann Hansel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martina Navratilova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Martina Navratilova won the 1985 Australian Open round of 64 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Navratilova | 6-2 6-1 | Dee Ann Hansel | Match data | Nov 29, 1985* | R64 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Navratilova | #395 | #1 | 290 | 2,680 | 1,419 | 228 | 86.2% | 18 | 3 | 8 | 38 | 100 | 167 |
| Dee Ann Hansel | — | — | — | 1,544 | 8 | 18 | 30.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Martina Navratilova | Dee Ann Hansel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 17–17 | 50.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,960 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 82–22 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,246 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #4 | 2,166 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 67–15 | 81.7% | #3 | 2,250 | 0 | 13 | 1988 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 78–9 | 89.7% | #1 | 2,433 | 1 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 91–12 | 88.3% | #1 | 2,439 | 2 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 86–12 | 87.8% | #3 | 2,366 | 2 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 90–15 | 85.7% | #3 | 2,423 | 3 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 85–3 | 96.6% | #1 | 2,538 | 5 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 84–1 | 98.8% | #1 | 2,638 | 8 | 86 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 78–2 | 97.5% | #1 | 2,649 | 11 | 99 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 84–5 | 94.4% | #1 | 2,595 | 13 | 111 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 84–3 | 96.6% | #1 | 2,633 | 15 | 125 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 56–8 | 87.5% | #2 | 2,527 | 17 | 129 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 70–7 | 90.9% | #2 | 2,455 | 17 | 138 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 68–8 | 89.5% | #2 | 2,425 | 17 | 146 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 52–7 | 88.1% | #3 | 2,322 | 18 | 152 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 53–9 | 85.5% | #4 | 2,321 | 18 | 157 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 38–8 | 82.6% | #5 | 2,328 | 18 | 161 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 46–8 | 85.2% | #3 | 2,265 | 18 | 166 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #8 | 2,073 | 18 | 167 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 2,051 | 18 | 167 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #388 | 1,940 | 18 | 167 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #395 | 1,910 | 18 | 167 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Martina Navratilova | Dee Ann Hansel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1972 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1973 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1985 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1974 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 16 | 4 | 20 | 80.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 1986 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1975 | 25 | 7 | 32 | 78.1% | 25 | 7 | 32 | 78.1% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 23 | 5 | 28 | 82.1% | 1987 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1976 | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 14 | 2 | 16 | 87.5% | 16 | 8 | 24 | 66.7% | 1988 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 17 | 6 | 23 | 73.9% | 10 | 1 | 11 | 90.9% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 31 | 5 | 36 | 86.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 20 | 4 | 24 | 83.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 13 | 0 | 13 | 100.0% | 43 | 4 | 47 | 91.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 14 | 3 | 17 | 82.4% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 14 | 2 | 16 | 87.5% | 59 | 6 | 65 | 90.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 18 | 5 | 23 | 78.3% | 9 | 0 | 9 | 100.0% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 47 | 3 | 50 | 94.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 14 | 2 | 16 | 87.5% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 21 | 4 | 25 | 84.0% | 44 | 6 | 50 | 88.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 12 | 1 | 13 | 92.3% | 15 | 0 | 15 | 100.0% | 21 | 1 | 22 | 95.5% | 37 | 1 | 38 | 97.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 22 | 0 | 22 | 100.0% | 12 | 1 | 13 | 92.3% | 19 | 0 | 19 | 100.0% | 31 | 0 | 31 | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 17 | 0 | 17 | 100.0% | 16 | 0 | 16 | 100.0% | 27 | 1 | 28 | 96.4% | 18 | 1 | 19 | 94.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 24 | 3 | 27 | 88.9% | 14 | 1 | 15 | 93.3% | 29 | 0 | 29 | 100.0% | 17 | 1 | 18 | 94.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 17 | 0 | 17 | 100.0% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% | 13 | 0 | 13 | 100.0% | 44 | 1 | 45 | 97.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 15 | 2 | 17 | 88.2% | 13 | 3 | 16 | 81.3% | 17 | 2 | 19 | 89.5% | 11 | 1 | 12 | 91.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 26 | 3 | 29 | 89.7% | 17 | 2 | 19 | 89.5% | 12 | 1 | 13 | 92.3% | 15 | 1 | 16 | 93.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 28 | 3 | 31 | 90.3% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 17 | 1 | 18 | 94.4% | 17 | 2 | 19 | 89.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 12 | 2 | 14 | 85.7% | 14 | 3 | 17 | 82.4% | 13 | 0 | 13 | 100.0% | 13 | 2 | 15 | 86.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 15 | 2 | 17 | 88.2% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 15 | 1 | 16 | 93.8% | 17 | 3 | 20 | 85.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 14 | 1 | 15 | 93.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 17 | 4 | 21 | 81.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 15 | 2 | 17 | 88.2% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 12 | 2 | 14 | 85.7% | 17 | 3 | 20 | 85.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 344 | 57 | 401 | 85.8% | 226 | 58 | 284 | 79.6% | 315 | 42 | 357 | 88.2% | 534 | 71 | 605 | 88.3% | Career | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Martina Navratilova | Dee Ann Hansel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1972 | 1483 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.21 | 1981 | 1484 | 97.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.03 |
| 1973 | 1742 | 151.2 | — | — | — | — | -211 | +47 | -161 | 52.0% | +0.01 | 4–5 (44%) | 2–3 (40%) | 100.5 | -2.70 | 1982 | 1470 | 92.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | +0.21 |
| 1974 | 1961 | 159.8 | — | — | — | — | -284 | +114 | -237 | 60.3% | +0.74 | 12–11 (52%) | 11–4 (73%) | 109.9 | -9.92 | 1985 | 1528 | 118.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 54.5% | +0.14 | 2–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.26 |
| 1975 | 2247 | 173.0 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -18 | -381 | 75.8% | +1.74 | 14–7 (67%) | 11–2 (85%) | 111.4 | -10.84 | 1986 | 1513 | 100.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.60 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.10 |
| 1976 | 2166 | 161.0 | — | — | — | — | +4 | -34 | -73 | 70.4% | +1.38 | 11–6 (65%) | 4–1 (80%) | 102.0 | -6.41 | 1987 | 1475 | 96.4 | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | — | 31.3% | -1.25 | 1–3 (25%) | — | — | +0.44 |
| 1977 | 2251 | 173.4 | — | — | — | — | +102 | -69 | -110 | 79.0% | +2.21 | 7–7 (50%) | 10–5 (67%) | 100.7 | -8.80 | 1988 | 1452 | 95.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +83 | 15.4% | -2.92 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.05 |
| 1978 | 2434 | 178.4 | — | — | — | — | +35 | -307 | -96 | 84.1% | +2.77 | 15–2 (88%) | 5–10 (33%) | 104.2 | -6.56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 2440 | 178.7 | — | — | — | — | +37 | -222 | -63 | 84.3% | +2.59 | 11–3 (79%) | 7–2 (78%) | 102.8 | -4.63 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 2367 | 177.3 | — | — | — | — | +175 | -69 | -15 | 82.0% | +2.50 | 17–6 (74%) | 13–3 (81%) | 101.9 | -4.48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 2423 | 179.0 | — | — | — | — | +104 | -134 | -12 | 80.4% | +2.47 | 16–11 (59%) | 7–9 (44%) | 93.9 | -8.43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 2539 | 179.0 | — | — | — | — | +107 | -124 | -87 | 90.0% | +3.08 | 13–3 (81%) | 12–4 (75%) | 104.0 | -2.79 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 2638 | 183.0 | — | — | — | — | +115 | -236 | -76 | 94.9% | +3.91 | 7–1 (88%) | 5–0 (100%) | 105.4 | -2.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 2649 | 177.2 | — | — | — | — | +103 | -152 | -65 | 94.0% | +3.48 | 7–2 (78%) | 7–1 (88%) | 103.4 | -1.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 2595 | 177.6 | — | — | — | — | +45 | -39 | +99 | 90.1% | +3.06 | 10–3 (77%) | 9–4 (69%) | 101.4 | -1.95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 2634 | 182.2 | — | — | — | — | +69 | -119 | +83 | 91.0% | +3.03 | 12–2 (86%) | 14–2 (88%) | 107.4 | -2.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 2527 | 176.8 | — | — | — | — | +116 | -43 | +190 | 85.7% | +2.83 | 3–2 (60%) | 7–4 (64%) | 99.6 | -3.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 2456 | 176.7 | — | — | — | — | +130 | +15 | +223 | 85.5% | +2.93 | 10–3 (77%) | 3–5 (38%) | 94.4 | -2.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 2425 | 176.2 | — | — | — | — | +96 | -16 | +175 | 86.5% | +2.82 | 7–4 (64%) | 9–1 (90%) | 98.0 | -2.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 2323 | 174.5 | — | — | — | — | +99 | +62 | +414 | 84.5% | +2.88 | 6–5 (55%) | 5–3 (63%) | 94.9 | -0.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 2322 | 172.3 | — | — | — | — | +106 | +3 | +333 | 79.3% | +2.24 | 10–4 (71%) | 9–5 (64%) | 101.2 | -1.85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 2328 | 175.0 | — | — | — | — | +97 | — | +412 | 77.5% | +2.13 | 6–6 (50%) | 10–0 (100%) | 98.4 | -1.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 2265 | 172.8 | — | — | — | — | +97 | -12 | +351 | 79.2% | +2.30 | 9–3 (75%) | 5–2 (71%) | 100.2 | -1.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 2074 | 161.5 | — | — | — | — | +133 | +37 | +402 | 64.9% | +1.41 | 12–8 (60%) | 5–4 (56%) | 92.1 | -1.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 2052 | 102.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 1941 | 100.2 | +0.20 | -0.26 | 1.142 | 52.8% | — | +91 | — | 33.3% | -0.50 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 1911 | 97.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 2680 | 180.0 | +0.20 | -0.26 | 1.142 | 52.8% | +78 | -38 | +49 | 81.7% | +2.48 | 220–109 (67%) | 170–74 (70%) | 105.4 | -5.25 | Career | 1544 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | +83 | 33.3% | -1.31 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 99.6 | +1.42 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Evert | 44 | 38 | 82 | Nov 13, 1988 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 39 | 3 | 42 | Mar 28, 1992 | H2H |
| Hana Mandlikova | 27 | 8 | 35 | Aug 12, 1989 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 33 | 1 | 34 | Nov 7, 1993 | H2H |
| Wendy Turnbull | 30 | 4 | 34 | Feb 19, 1988 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robin White | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 15, 1988 | H2H |
| Pam Casale | 1 | 0 | 1 | Jul 14, 1988 | H2H |
| Yukie Koizumi | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jan 27, 1988 | H2H |
| Lori Mcneil | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jan 13, 1988 | H2H |
| Janine Tremelling | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jan 6, 1988 | H2H |