H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Martina Navratilova vs Judith Wiesner H2H: 4-0

Martina Navratilova holds a 4–0 lead over Judith Wiesner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Martina Navratilova leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Martina Navratilova won the 1991 Filderstadt semifinal 6-2 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Navratilova
USA Age 69 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Judith Wiesner
AUT Age 60 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 19, 1991* Filderstadt WTA 250 SF Hard Martina Navratilova #4 6-2 7-6 Judith Wiesner #16 Match data
Jul 4, 1990* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Martina Navratilova #2 6-3 6-3 Judith Wiesner #15 Match data
Mar 2, 1990* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Martina Navratilova #2 6-3 6-2 Judith Wiesner #28 Match data
Feb 22, 1988 Washington WTA 250 R32 Hard Martina Navratilova #2 6-2 6-3 Judith Wiesner #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Martina Navratilova #395 #1 290 2,664 1,427 227 86.3% 18 8 8 15 120 168
Judith Wiesner #48 #12 1,590 1,979 302 177 63.0% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Navratilova Judith Wiesner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1973 20–17 54.1% — 1,761 0 2 — — — — — — —
17 1974 39–20 66.1% — 1,975 0 4 — — — — — — —
18 1975 81–21 79.4% — 2,218 0 7 — — — — — — —
19 1976 41–16 71.9% — 2,153 0 9 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
20 1977 67–15 81.7% — 2,243 0 15 1986 3–3 50.0% #141 1,514 0 0
21 1978 78–9 89.7% — 2,420 1 26 1987 19–13 59.4% #33 1,696 0 0
22 1979 91–12 88.3% — 2,428 2 36 1988 22–17 56.4% #33 1,751 0 1
23 1980 86–12 87.8% — 2,344 2 47 1989 22–14 61.1% #35 1,736 0 2
24 1981 90–15 85.7% — 2,407 3 57 1990 41–19 68.3% #17 1,845 0 2
25 1982 85–3 96.6% — 2,521 5 72 1991 28–14 66.7% #16 1,962 0 2
26 1983 84–1 98.8% — 2,622 8 88 1992 29–17 63.0% #25 1,916 0 3
27 1984 78–2 97.5% #1 2,633 11 101 1993 30–17 63.8% #21 1,906 0 3
28 1985 84–5 94.4% #1 2,583 13 113 1994 28–15 65.1% #25 1,893 0 4
29 1986 84–3 96.6% #1 2,626 15 126 1995 28–14 66.7% #25 1,914 0 5
30 1987 56–8 87.5% #2 2,523 17 130 1996 35–22 61.4% #15 1,925 0 5
31 1988 70–7 90.9% #2 2,452 17 139 1997 17–11 60.7% #48 1,829 0 5
32 1989 68–8 89.5% #2 2,393 17 147 — — — — — — —
33 1990 52–7 88.1% #3 2,306 18 153 — — — — — — —
34 1991 53–9 85.5% #4 2,316 18 158 — — — — — — —
35 1992 38–8 82.6% #5 2,326 18 162 — — — — — — —
36 1993 46–8 85.2% #3 2,264 18 167 — — — — — — —
37 1994 33–14 70.2% #8 2,073 18 168 — — — — — — —
45 2002 1–1 50.0% — 2,051 18 168 — — — — — — —
47 2004 1–4 20.0% #388 1,940 18 168 — — — — — — —
48 2005 0–1 0.0% #395 1,910 18 168 — — — — — — —