H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Martina Navratilova vs Laura Arraya H2H: 5-0

Martina Navratilova holds a 5–0 lead over Laura Arraya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Martina Navratilova leads 3–0 on clay and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Martina Navratilova won the 1992 Tokyo Pan Pacific quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Navratilova
USA Age 70 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main-draw meetings
Laura Arraya
PER Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martina Navratilova #4 6-4 6-3 Laura Arraya #22 Match data Feb 2, 1992* QF Tokyo Pan Pacific Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Martina Navratilova #3 6-2 7-6 Laura Arraya #25 Match data Feb 3, 1991* SF Tokyo Pan Pacific Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Martina Navratilova #2 6-4 4-6 6-0 Laura Arraya Match data Apr 6, 1989* R32 Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay
Martina Navratilova #1 6-3 6-4 Laura Arraya #31 Match data Apr 24, 1987* R16 Houston WTA 250 Clay
Martina Navratilova #1 6-0 6-1 Laura Arraya #32 Match data Apr 29, 1984* F Orlando WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martina Navratilova — #1 290 2,683 1,419 230 86.1% 18 3 8 51 87 167
Laura Arraya — #14 51 1,922 270 204 57.0% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Navratilova Laura Arraya
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1973 17–17 50.0% — 1,741 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1974 34–20 63.0% — 1,960 0 1 1981 19–8 70.4% — 1,685 0 4
18 1975 82–22 78.8% #3 2,247 0 5 1982 33–17 66.0% — 1,741 0 7
19 1976 41–16 71.9% #4 2,171 0 7 1983 23–23 50.0% — 1,713 0 7
20 1977 67–15 81.7% #3 2,254 0 13 1984 29–18 61.7% #34 1,760 0 8
21 1978 78–10 88.6% #1 2,411 1 24 1985 17–21 44.7% #63 1,691 0 8
22 1979 91–12 88.3% #1 2,438 2 34 1986 23–24 48.9% #33 1,718 0 8
23 1980 86–13 86.9% #3 2,360 2 45 1987 16–14 53.3% #45 1,770 0 8
24 1981 90–15 85.7% #3 2,426 3 55 — — — — — — —
25 1982 85–3 96.6% #1 2,541 5 70 1989 27–12 69.2% #19 1,882 0 10
26 1983 84–1 98.8% #1 2,641 8 86 1990 26–19 57.8% #21 1,821 0 10
27 1984 78–2 97.5% #1 2,651 11 99 1991 28–17 62.2% #24 1,823 0 10
28 1985 84–5 94.4% #1 2,597 13 111 1992 20–19 51.3% #45 1,732 0 10
29 1986 84–3 96.6% #1 2,635 15 125 1993 9–12 42.9% #71 1,682 0 10
30 1987 56–8 87.5% #2 2,528 17 129 — — — — — — —
31 1988 70–7 90.9% #2 2,456 17 138 — — — — — — —
32 1989 68–8 89.5% #2 2,425 17 146 — — — — — — —
33 1990 52–7 88.1% #3 2,323 18 152 — — — — — — —
34 1991 53–9 85.5% #4 2,322 18 157 — — — — — — —
35 1992 38–8 82.6% #5 2,328 18 161 — — — — — — —
36 1993 46–8 85.2% #3 2,265 18 166 — — — — — — —
37 1994 33–14 70.2% #8 2,073 18 167 — — — — — — —
45 2002 1–1 50.0% — 2,051 18 167 — — — — — — —
47 2004 1–4 20.0% #388 1,940 18 167 — — — — — — —
48 2005 0–1 0.0% — 1,910 18 167 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martina Navratilova Laura Arraya
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1972 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 0 2 2 0.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 1 3 4 25.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1975 25 7 32 78.1% 25 7 32 78.1% 9 3 12 75.0% 23 5 28 82.1% 1982 10 6 16 62.5% 23 10 33 69.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1976 10 4 14 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 2 16 87.5% 16 8 24 66.7% 1983 10 8 18 55.6% 10 11 21 47.6% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
20 1977 17 6 23 73.9% 10 1 11 90.9% 9 3 12 75.0% 31 5 36 86.1% 1984 7 7 14 50.0% 19 7 26 73.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1978 20 4 24 83.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 0 13 100.0% 43 4 47 91.5% 1985 9 9 18 50.0% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1979 14 3 17 82.4% 4 1 5 80.0% 14 2 16 87.5% 59 6 65 90.8% 1986 3 7 10 30.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2%
23 1980 18 6 24 75.0% 9 0 9 100.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 47 3 50 94.0% 1987 7 5 12 58.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
24 1981 14 2 16 87.5% 11 3 14 78.6% 21 4 25 84.0% 44 6 50 88.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1982 12 1 13 92.3% 15 0 15 100.0% 21 1 22 95.5% 37 1 38 97.4% 1989 15 3 18 83.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1983 22 0 22 100.0% 12 1 13 92.3% 19 0 19 100.0% 31 0 31 100.0% 1990 13 6 19 68.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1984 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 27 1 28 96.4% 18 1 19 94.7% 1991 18 12 30 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 1985 24 3 27 88.9% 14 1 15 93.3% 29 0 29 100.0% 17 1 18 94.4% 1992 8 9 17 47.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0%
29 1986 17 0 17 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 13 0 13 100.0% 44 1 45 97.8% 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 1987 15 2 17 88.2% 13 3 16 81.3% 17 2 19 89.5% 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 26 3 29 89.7% 17 2 19 89.5% 12 1 13 92.3% 15 1 16 93.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 28 3 31 90.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 17 1 18 94.4% 17 2 19 89.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 12 2 14 85.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 13 0 13 100.0% 13 2 15 86.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1991 15 2 17 88.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 15 1 16 93.8% 17 3 20 85.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1992 14 1 15 93.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 17 4 21 81.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1993 15 2 17 88.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 12 2 14 85.7% 17 3 20 85.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1994 8 2 10 80.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
45 2002 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
47 2004 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
48 2005 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 344 58 402 85.6% 226 58 284 79.6% 315 42 357 88.2% 534 71 605 88.3% — 105 80 185 56.8% 103 73 176 58.5% 16 14 30 53.3% 28 31 59 47.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martina Navratilova Laura Arraya
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1972 1483 98.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1742 151.2 — — — — -211 +47 -161 52.0% +0.01 4–5 (44%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -2.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 1961 159.8 — — — — -284 +114 -237 60.3% +0.74 12–11 (52%) 11–4 (73%) 109.9 -10.07 1981 1686 129.2 — — — — -72 — — 65.6% +0.74 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 104.4 -1.28
18 1975 2248 173.0 — — — — +7 -18 -381 75.8% +1.74 14–7 (67%) 11–2 (85%) 111.5 -12.63 1982 1742 127.0 — — — — -62 -26 — 62.7% +0.91 10–8 (56%) 8–5 (62%) 102.3 +2.31
19 1976 2171 161.3 — — — — +2 -37 -76 70.4% +1.38 11–6 (65%) 4–1 (80%) 102.0 -6.18 1983 1713 125.8 — — — — +7 +31 — 51.4% -0.24 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 95.2 +0.82
20 1977 2254 173.5 — — — — +99 -71 -111 79.0% +2.21 7–7 (50%) 10–5 (67%) 100.7 -8.88 1984 1760 130.7 — — — — -102 +142 -131 53.8% +0.03 18–5 (78%) 9–4 (69%) 110.1 +0.87
21 1978 2411 178.8 — — — — +64 -284 -71 83.2% +2.69 15–2 (88%) 5–10 (33%) 104.2 -7.28 1985 1692 125.0 — — — — -1 +60 — 45.1% -0.27 8–7 (53%) 3–2 (60%) 99.8 +1.85
22 1979 2439 178.9 — — — — +41 -219 -58 84.3% +2.59 11–3 (79%) 7–2 (78%) 102.8 -4.91 1986 1719 138.2 — — — — -26 +99 — 51.0% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 100.4 -2.33
23 1980 2360 177.9 — — — — +171 -59 -3 81.3% +2.45 17–6 (74%) 13–3 (81%) 102.1 -5.38 1987 1771 133.6 — — — — -31 -12 -185 51.6% +0.05 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) 100.0 -2.61
24 1981 2426 179.3 — — — — +101 -134 -12 80.4% +2.47 16–11 (59%) 7–9 (44%) 94.1 -8.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1982 2542 179.1 — — — — +105 -126 -87 90.0% +3.08 13–3 (81%) 12–4 (75%) 104.0 -3.08 1989 1883 136.9 — — — — -7 -146 -254 65.2% +0.79 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 102.9 -0.64
26 1983 2641 183.1 — — — — +115 -238 -77 94.9% +3.91 7–1 (88%) 5–0 (100%) 105.4 -2.54 1990 1821 142.0 — — — — +31 -55 -173 55.4% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 5–8 (38%) 98.6 +0.41
27 1984 2652 177.3 — — — — +102 -154 -67 94.0% +3.48 7–2 (78%) 7–1 (88%) 103.4 -1.21 1991 1824 132.7 — — — — +12 -70 -95 56.9% +0.19 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 105.5 +2.96
28 1985 2597 177.7 — — — — +45 -40 +98 90.1% +3.06 10–3 (77%) 9–4 (69%) 101.4 -2.02 1992 1733 139.0 — — — — +2 +53 +3 49.4% +0.06 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 97.6 +1.62
29 1986 2635 182.2 — — — — +71 -120 +83 91.0% +3.03 12–2 (86%) 14–2 (88%) 107.4 -2.42 1993 1682 125.0 — — — — +13 +124 +9 44.0% -0.66 4–4 (50%) 2–0 — -0.06
30 1987 2529 176.8 — — — — +116 -44 +190 85.7% +2.83 3–2 (60%) 7–4 (64%) 99.6 -3.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 2457 176.8 — — — — +130 +14 +224 85.5% +2.93 10–3 (77%) 3–5 (38%) 94.4 -2.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 2426 176.3 — — — — +96 -17 +175 86.5% +2.82 7–4 (64%) 9–1 (90%) 98.0 -1.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 2323 174.5 — — — — +100 +63 +416 84.5% +2.88 6–5 (55%) 5–3 (63%) 94.9 -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1991 2322 172.3 — — — — +107 +4 +335 79.3% +2.24 10–4 (71%) 9–5 (64%) 101.2 -1.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1992 2329 175.0 — — — — +96 — +413 77.5% +2.13 6–6 (50%) 10–0 (100%) 98.4 -1.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1993 2266 172.8 — — — — +96 -13 +353 79.2% +2.30 9–3 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 100.1 -1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1994 2074 161.5 — — — — +132 +37 +403 64.9% +1.41 12–8 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 92.1 -1.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
45 2002 2052 102.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
47 2004 1941 100.2 +0.20 -0.26 1.142 52.8% — +91 — 33.3% -0.50 0–2 — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
48 2005 1911 97.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2683 180.1 +0.20 -0.26 1.142 52.8% +80 -38 +50 81.7% +2.48 220–109 (67%) 170–74 (70%) 105.5 -5.56 — 1923 138.4 — — — — -10 +27 -133 54.6% +0.19 90–63 (59%) 50–44 (53%) 104.5 +0.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.