H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Martina Navratilova vs Lea Antonoplis H2H: 4-0

Martina Navratilova holds a 4–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Martina Navratilova leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Martina Navratilova won the 1984 US Open first round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Navratilova
USA Age 69 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 30, 1984* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Martina Navratilova #1 6-4 6-2 Lea Antonoplis #87 Match data
Nov 27, 1982* Sydney WTA 500 QF Grass Martina Navratilova 6-1 6-4 Lea Antonoplis Match data
Jan 1, 1979 Washington WTA 250 R32 Carpet Martina Navratilova 6-1 6-0 Lea Antonoplis Match data
Jun 27, 1976* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Martina Navratilova 6-1 6-4 Lea Antonoplis Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Martina Navratilova #395 #1 290 2,664 1,427 227 86.3% 18 8 8 15 120 168
Lea Antonoplis #599 #66 6 1,774 126 176 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Navratilova Lea Antonoplis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,579 0 0
15 1972 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 1 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0
16 1973 20–17 54.1% — 1,761 0 2 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,559 0 0
17 1974 39–20 66.1% — 1,975 0 4 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,626 0 0
18 1975 81–21 79.4% — 2,218 0 7 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,665 0 0
19 1976 41–16 71.9% — 2,153 0 9 1978 17–20 45.9% — 1,717 0 0
20 1977 67–15 81.7% — 2,243 0 15 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,724 0 1
21 1978 78–9 89.7% — 2,420 1 26 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,735 0 2
22 1979 91–12 88.3% — 2,428 2 36 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,719 0 2
23 1980 86–12 87.8% — 2,344 2 47 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,632 0 2
24 1981 90–15 85.7% — 2,407 3 57 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,568 0 2
25 1982 85–3 96.6% — 2,521 5 72 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,583 0 2
26 1983 84–1 98.8% — 2,622 8 88 1985 14–21 40.0% #66 1,572 0 2
27 1984 78–2 97.5% #1 2,633 11 101 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,460 0 2
28 1985 84–5 94.4% #1 2,583 13 113 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,413 0 2
29 1986 84–3 96.6% #1 2,626 15 126 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,455 0 2
30 1987 56–8 87.5% #2 2,523 17 130 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,448 0 2
31 1988 70–7 90.9% #2 2,452 17 139 1990 0–1 0.0% #599 1,432 0 2
32 1989 68–8 89.5% #2 2,393 17 147 — — — — — — —
33 1990 52–7 88.1% #3 2,306 18 153 — — — — — — —
34 1991 53–9 85.5% #4 2,316 18 158 — — — — — — —
35 1992 38–8 82.6% #5 2,326 18 162 — — — — — — —
36 1993 46–8 85.2% #3 2,264 18 167 — — — — — — —
37 1994 33–14 70.2% #8 2,073 18 168 — — — — — — —
45 2002 1–1 50.0% — 2,051 18 168 — — — — — — —
47 2004 1–4 20.0% #388 1,940 18 168 — — — — — — —
48 2005 0–1 0.0% #395 1,910 18 168 — — — — — — —