H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Martina Navratilova vs Lea Antonoplis H2H: 4-0

Martina Navratilova holds a 4–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Martina Navratilova leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Martina Navratilova won the 1984 US Open round of 128 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Navratilova
USA Age 69 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main-draw meetings
Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martina Navratilova #1 6-4 6-2 Lea Antonoplis #87 Match data Aug 30, 1984* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Martina Navratilova 6-1 6-4 Lea Antonoplis Match data Nov 27, 1982* QF Sydney International WTA 500 Grass
Martina Navratilova 6-1 6-0 Lea Antonoplis Match data Jan 1, 1979 R32 Washington Open WTA 250 Carpet
Martina Navratilova 6-1 6-4 Lea Antonoplis Match data Jun 27, 1976* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martina Navratilova #395 #1 290 2,680 1,419 228 86.2% 18 3 8 38 100 167
Lea Antonoplis #599 #66 6 1,770 126 176 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Navratilova Lea Antonoplis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0
15 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0
16 1973 17–17 50.0% — 1,741 0 0 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0
17 1974 34–20 63.0% — 1,960 0 1 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0
18 1975 82–22 78.8% #3 2,246 0 5 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0
19 1976 41–16 71.9% #4 2,166 0 7 1978 17–20 45.9% — 1,713 0 0
20 1977 67–15 81.7% #3 2,250 0 13 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,722 0 1
21 1978 78–9 89.7% #1 2,433 1 24 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2
22 1979 91–12 88.3% #1 2,439 2 34 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,717 0 2
23 1980 86–12 87.8% #3 2,366 2 45 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,631 0 2
24 1981 90–15 85.7% #3 2,423 3 55 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,567 0 2
25 1982 85–3 96.6% #1 2,538 5 70 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,582 0 2
26 1983 84–1 98.8% #1 2,638 8 86 1985 14–21 40.0% #66 1,570 0 2
27 1984 78–2 97.5% #1 2,649 11 99 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,458 0 2
28 1985 84–5 94.4% #1 2,595 13 111 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2
29 1986 84–3 96.6% #1 2,633 15 125 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,453 0 2
30 1987 56–8 87.5% #2 2,527 17 129 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,446 0 2
31 1988 70–7 90.9% #2 2,455 17 138 1990 0–1 0.0% #599 1,430 0 2
32 1989 68–8 89.5% #2 2,425 17 146 — — — — — — —
33 1990 52–7 88.1% #3 2,322 18 152 — — — — — — —
34 1991 53–9 85.5% #4 2,321 18 157 — — — — — — —
35 1992 38–8 82.6% #5 2,328 18 161 — — — — — — —
36 1993 46–8 85.2% #3 2,265 18 166 — — — — — — —
37 1994 33–14 70.2% #8 2,073 18 167 — — — — — — —
45 2002 1–1 50.0% — 2,051 18 167 — — — — — — —
47 2004 1–4 20.0% #388 1,940 18 167 — — — — — — —
48 2005 0–1 0.0% #395 1,910 18 167 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martina Navratilova Lea Antonoplis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1972 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
16 1973 0 2 2 0.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1974 1 3 4 25.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1975 25 7 32 78.1% 25 7 32 78.1% 9 3 12 75.0% 23 5 28 82.1% 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1976 10 4 14 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 2 16 87.5% 16 8 24 66.7% 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3%
20 1977 17 6 23 73.9% 10 1 11 90.9% 9 3 12 75.0% 31 5 36 86.1% 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1978 20 4 24 83.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 0 13 100.0% 43 4 47 91.5% 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 1979 14 3 17 82.4% 4 1 5 80.0% 14 2 16 87.5% 59 6 65 90.8% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1980 18 5 23 78.3% 9 0 9 100.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 47 3 50 94.0% 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5%
24 1981 14 2 16 87.5% 11 3 14 78.6% 21 4 25 84.0% 44 6 50 88.0% 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
25 1982 12 1 13 92.3% 15 0 15 100.0% 21 1 22 95.5% 37 1 38 97.4% 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1983 22 0 22 100.0% 12 1 13 92.3% 19 0 19 100.0% 31 0 31 100.0% 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
27 1984 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 27 1 28 96.4% 18 1 19 94.7% 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1985 24 3 27 88.9% 14 1 15 93.3% 29 0 29 100.0% 17 1 18 94.4% 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1986 17 0 17 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 13 0 13 100.0% 44 1 45 97.8% 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1987 15 2 17 88.2% 13 3 16 81.3% 17 2 19 89.5% 11 1 12 91.7% 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 1988 26 3 29 89.7% 17 2 19 89.5% 12 1 13 92.3% 15 1 16 93.8% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 28 3 31 90.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 17 1 18 94.4% 17 2 19 89.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 12 2 14 85.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 13 0 13 100.0% 13 2 15 86.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1991 15 2 17 88.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 15 1 16 93.8% 17 3 20 85.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1992 14 1 15 93.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 17 4 21 81.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1993 15 2 17 88.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 12 2 14 85.7% 17 3 20 85.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1994 8 2 10 80.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
45 2002 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
47 2004 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
48 2005 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 344 57 401 85.8% 226 58 284 79.6% 315 42 357 88.2% 534 71 605 88.3% — 45 72 117 38.5% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martina Navratilova Lea Antonoplis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55
15 1972 1483 98.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.21 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36
16 1973 1742 151.2 — — — — -211 +47 -161 52.0% +0.01 4–5 (44%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -2.70 1975 1560 115.7 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.23
17 1974 1961 159.8 — — — — -284 +114 -237 60.3% +0.74 12–11 (52%) 11–4 (73%) 109.9 -9.92 1976 1610 115.6 — — — — +32 -28 -16 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.98
18 1975 2247 173.0 — — — — +6 -18 -381 75.8% +1.74 14–7 (67%) 11–2 (85%) 111.4 -10.84 1977 1652 115.1 — — — — -3 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.94
19 1976 2166 161.0 — — — — +4 -34 -73 70.4% +1.38 11–6 (65%) 4–1 (80%) 102.0 -6.41 1978 1713 131.8 — — — — -75 — +41 49.4% -0.07 9–8 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 104.2 +1.01
20 1977 2251 173.4 — — — — +102 -69 -110 79.0% +2.21 7–7 (50%) 10–5 (67%) 100.7 -8.80 1979 1722 130.7 — — — — -96 — +9 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.3 -0.92
21 1978 2434 178.4 — — — — +35 -307 -96 84.1% +2.77 15–2 (88%) 5–10 (33%) 104.2 -6.56 1980 1733 124.0 — — — — -109 — +62 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.4 +1.51
22 1979 2440 178.7 — — — — +37 -222 -63 84.3% +2.59 11–3 (79%) 7–2 (78%) 102.8 -4.63 1981 1717 116.5 — — — — -101 — +95 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.92
23 1980 2367 177.3 — — — — +175 -69 -15 82.0% +2.50 17–6 (74%) 13–3 (81%) 101.9 -4.48 1982 1632 114.6 — — — — -131 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.5 +1.22
24 1981 2423 179.0 — — — — +104 -134 -12 80.4% +2.47 16–11 (59%) 7–9 (44%) 93.9 -8.43 1983 1568 97.8 — — — — -36 +18 +127 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.47
25 1982 2539 179.0 — — — — +107 -124 -87 90.0% +3.08 13–3 (81%) 12–4 (75%) 104.0 -2.79 1984 1583 111.0 — — — — -40 — +93 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.39
26 1983 2638 183.0 — — — — +115 -236 -76 94.9% +3.91 7–1 (88%) 5–0 (100%) 105.4 -2.30 1985 1571 120.1 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.25
27 1984 2649 177.2 — — — — +103 -152 -65 94.0% +3.48 7–2 (78%) 7–1 (88%) 103.4 -1.21 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -14 — +163 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.93
28 1985 2595 177.6 — — — — +45 -39 +99 90.1% +3.06 10–3 (77%) 9–4 (69%) 101.4 -1.95 1987 1412 91.7 — — — — -6 +46 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.71
29 1986 2634 182.2 — — — — +69 -119 +83 91.0% +3.03 12–2 (86%) 14–2 (88%) 107.4 -2.24 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.67
30 1987 2527 176.8 — — — — +116 -43 +190 85.7% +2.83 3–2 (60%) 7–4 (64%) 99.6 -3.06 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -13 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.78
31 1988 2456 176.7 — — — — +130 +15 +223 85.5% +2.93 10–3 (77%) 3–5 (38%) 94.4 -2.10 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21
32 1989 2425 176.2 — — — — +96 -16 +175 86.5% +2.82 7–4 (64%) 9–1 (90%) 98.0 -2.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 2323 174.5 — — — — +99 +62 +414 84.5% +2.88 6–5 (55%) 5–3 (63%) 94.9 -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1991 2322 172.3 — — — — +106 +3 +333 79.3% +2.24 10–4 (71%) 9–5 (64%) 101.2 -1.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1992 2328 175.0 — — — — +97 — +412 77.5% +2.13 6–6 (50%) 10–0 (100%) 98.4 -1.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1993 2265 172.8 — — — — +97 -12 +351 79.2% +2.30 9–3 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 100.2 -1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1994 2074 161.5 — — — — +133 +37 +402 64.9% +1.41 12–8 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 92.1 -1.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
45 2002 2052 102.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
47 2004 1941 100.2 +0.20 -0.26 1.142 52.8% — +91 — 33.3% -0.50 0–2 — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
48 2005 1911 97.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2680 180.0 +0.20 -0.26 1.142 52.8% +78 -38 +49 81.7% +2.48 220–109 (67%) 170–74 (70%) 105.4 -5.25 — 1771 121.5 — — — — -37 +2 +77 44.2% -0.49 43–60 (42%) 33–39 (46%) 95.8 +6.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.