H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Martina Navratilova vs Leila Meskhi H2H: 2-1

Martina Navratilova holds a 2–1 lead over Leila Meskhi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Martina Navratilova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Navratilova won the 1994 Paris semifinal 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Navratilova
USA Age 69 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Leila Meskhi
GEO Age 58 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 20, 1994* Paris WTA 500 SF Hard Martina Navratilova #3 6-1 6-3 Leila Meskhi #28 Match data
Apr 6, 1991* Hilton Head WTA 1000 QF Clay Leila Meskhi #17 6-4 2-6 6-4 Martina Navratilova #3 Match data
May 5, 1990* Hamburg WTA 250 QF Clay Martina Navratilova #2 6-3 6-4 Leila Meskhi #31 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Martina Navratilova #395 #1 290 2,664 1,427 227 86.3% 18 8 8 15 120 168
Leila Meskhi #903 #12 72 2,001 192 119 61.7% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Navratilova Leila Meskhi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1973 20–17 54.1% — 1,761 0 2 — — — — — — —
17 1974 39–20 66.1% — 1,975 0 4 — — — — — — —
18 1975 81–21 79.4% — 2,218 0 7 — — — — — — —
19 1976 41–16 71.9% — 2,153 0 9 1987 11–7 61.1% #46 1,655 0 0
20 1977 67–15 81.7% — 2,243 0 15 1988 17–17 50.0% #46 1,688 0 0
21 1978 78–9 89.7% — 2,420 1 26 1989 21–14 60.0% #30 1,794 0 1
22 1979 91–12 88.3% — 2,428 2 36 1990 38–14 73.1% #19 1,928 0 3
23 1980 86–12 87.8% — 2,344 2 47 1991 30–14 68.2% #15 1,937 0 4
24 1981 90–15 85.7% — 2,407 3 57 1992 26–15 63.4% #22 1,939 0 4
25 1982 85–3 96.6% — 2,521 5 72 1993 22–17 56.4% #37 1,874 0 4
26 1983 84–1 98.8% — 2,622 8 88 1994 22–15 59.5% #34 1,843 0 4
27 1984 78–2 97.5% #1 2,633 11 101 1995 5–2 71.4% #141 1,834 0 5
28 1985 84–5 94.4% #1 2,583 13 113 1996 0–4 0.0% #838 1,748 0 5
29 1986 84–3 96.6% #1 2,626 15 126 — — — — — — —
30 1987 56–8 87.5% #2 2,523 17 130 — — — — — — —
31 1988 70–7 90.9% #2 2,452 17 139 — — — — — — —
32 1989 68–8 89.5% #2 2,393 17 147 — — — — — — —
33 1990 52–7 88.1% #3 2,306 18 153 — — — — — — —
34 1991 53–9 85.5% #4 2,316 18 158 — — — — — — —
35 1992 38–8 82.6% #5 2,326 18 162 — — — — — — —
36 1993 46–8 85.2% #3 2,264 18 167 — — — — — — —
37 1994 33–14 70.2% #8 2,073 18 168 — — — — — — —
45 2002 1–1 50.0% — 2,051 18 168 — — — — — — —
47 2004 1–4 20.0% #388 1,940 18 168 — — — — — — —
48 2005 0–1 0.0% #395 1,910 18 168 — — — — — — —