H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Martina Navratilova vs Marcie Louie H2H: 5-0

Martina Navratilova holds a 5–0 lead over Marcie Louie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Martina Navratilova leads 4–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Martina Navratilova won the 1977 Houston round of 16 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Navratilova
USA Age 69 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main-draw meetings
Marcie Louie
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martina Navratilova 6-4 7-6 Marcie Louie Match data Jan 21, 1977* R16 Houston WTA 250 Carpet
Martina Navratilova 6-2 6-2 Marcie Louie Match data Jan 14, 1977* R16 Hollywood WTA 250 Carpet
Martina Navratilova 6-1 6-3 Marcie Louie Match data Jan 6, 1977* R32 Washington Open WTA 500 Carpet
Martina Navratilova 7-5 6-3 Marcie Louie Match data Dec 3, 1976* R32 Sydney WTA 500 Grass
Martina Navratilova 6-2 6-4 Marcie Louie Match data Feb 14, 1975* R16 Chicago WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martina Navratilova #395 #1 290 2,680 1,419 228 86.2% 18 3 8 38 100 167
Marcie Louie — — — 1,865 103 141 42.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Navratilova Marcie Louie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1968 1–2 33.3% — 1,491 0 0
15 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 1969 4–1 80.0% — 1,545 0 1
16 1973 17–17 50.0% — 1,741 0 0 1970 3–3 50.0% — 1,564 0 2
17 1974 34–20 63.0% — 1,960 0 1 1971 4–3 57.1% — 1,593 0 3
18 1975 82–22 78.8% #3 2,246 0 5 1972 19–20 48.7% — 1,699 0 3
19 1976 41–16 71.9% #4 2,166 0 7 1973 7–20 25.9% — 1,626 0 3
20 1977 67–15 81.7% #3 2,250 0 13 1974 11–17 39.3% — 1,684 0 3
21 1978 78–9 89.7% #1 2,433 1 24 1975 16–15 51.6% — 1,784 0 4
22 1979 91–12 88.3% #1 2,439 2 34 1976 13–16 44.8% — 1,787 0 4
23 1980 86–12 87.8% #3 2,366 2 45 1977 11–22 33.3% — 1,649 0 4
24 1981 90–15 85.7% #3 2,423 3 55 1978 0–2 0.0% — 1,601 0 4
25 1982 85–3 96.6% #1 2,538 5 70 1979 2–5 28.6% — 1,609 0 4
26 1983 84–1 98.8% #1 2,638 8 86 1980 10–10 50.0% — 1,609 0 4
27 1984 78–2 97.5% #1 2,649 11 99 1981 2–3 40.0% — 1,609 0 4
28 1985 84–5 94.4% #1 2,595 13 111 1982 0–2 0.0% — 1,576 0 4
29 1986 84–3 96.6% #1 2,633 15 125 — — — — — — —
30 1987 56–8 87.5% #2 2,527 17 129 — — — — — — —
31 1988 70–7 90.9% #2 2,455 17 138 — — — — — — —
32 1989 68–8 89.5% #2 2,425 17 146 — — — — — — —
33 1990 52–7 88.1% #3 2,322 18 152 — — — — — — —
34 1991 53–9 85.5% #4 2,321 18 157 — — — — — — —
35 1992 38–8 82.6% #5 2,328 18 161 — — — — — — —
36 1993 46–8 85.2% #3 2,265 18 166 — — — — — — —
37 1994 33–14 70.2% #8 2,073 18 167 — — — — — — —
45 2002 1–1 50.0% — 2,051 18 167 — — — — — — —
47 2004 1–4 20.0% #388 1,940 18 167 — — — — — — —
48 2005 0–1 0.0% #395 1,910 18 167 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martina Navratilova Marcie Louie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1972 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1969 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 0 2 2 0.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1970 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 1 3 4 25.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1971 2 0 2 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
18 1975 25 7 32 78.1% 25 7 32 78.1% 9 3 12 75.0% 23 5 28 82.1% 1972 1 4 5 20.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 11 6 17 64.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
19 1976 10 4 14 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 2 16 87.5% 16 8 24 66.7% 1973 2 4 6 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 8 11 27.3%
20 1977 17 6 23 73.9% 10 1 11 90.9% 9 3 12 75.0% 31 5 36 86.1% 1974 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
21 1978 20 4 24 83.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 0 13 100.0% 43 4 47 91.5% 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0%
22 1979 14 3 17 82.4% 4 1 5 80.0% 14 2 16 87.5% 59 6 65 90.8% 1976 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 8 12 33.3%
23 1980 18 5 23 78.3% 9 0 9 100.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 47 3 50 94.0% 1977 3 5 8 37.5% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 5 8 13 38.5%
24 1981 14 2 16 87.5% 11 3 14 78.6% 21 4 25 84.0% 44 6 50 88.0% 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1982 12 1 13 92.3% 15 0 15 100.0% 21 1 22 95.5% 37 1 38 97.4% 1979 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1983 22 0 22 100.0% 12 1 13 92.3% 19 0 19 100.0% 31 0 31 100.0% 1980 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1984 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 27 1 28 96.4% 18 1 19 94.7% 1981 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 24 3 27 88.9% 14 1 15 93.3% 29 0 29 100.0% 17 1 18 94.4% 1982 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 17 0 17 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 13 0 13 100.0% 44 1 45 97.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 15 2 17 88.2% 13 3 16 81.3% 17 2 19 89.5% 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 26 3 29 89.7% 17 2 19 89.5% 12 1 13 92.3% 15 1 16 93.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 28 3 31 90.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 17 1 18 94.4% 17 2 19 89.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 12 2 14 85.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 13 0 13 100.0% 13 2 15 86.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1991 15 2 17 88.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 15 1 16 93.8% 17 3 20 85.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1992 14 1 15 93.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 17 4 21 81.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1993 15 2 17 88.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 12 2 14 85.7% 17 3 20 85.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1994 8 2 10 80.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
45 2002 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
47 2004 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
48 2005 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 344 57 401 85.8% 226 58 284 79.6% 315 42 357 88.2% 534 71 605 88.3% — 28 41 69 40.6% 32 35 67 47.8% 13 18 31 41.9% 26 44 70 37.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martina Navratilova Marcie Louie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1492 100.8 — — — — +9 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — -0.04
15 1972 1483 98.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.21 1969 1545 108.9 — — — — +74 — — 72.7% +1.73 1–0 — — +0.89
16 1973 1742 151.2 — — — — -211 +47 -161 52.0% +0.01 4–5 (44%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -2.70 1970 1565 106.0 — — — — +51 — — 46.2% +0.08 1–0 1–1 — +0.63
17 1974 1961 159.8 — — — — -284 +114 -237 60.3% +0.74 12–11 (52%) 11–4 (73%) 109.9 -9.92 1971 1593 107.1 — — — — — — -48 50.0% -0.42 — — — +1.18
18 1975 2247 173.0 — — — — +6 -18 -381 75.8% +1.74 14–7 (67%) 11–2 (85%) 111.4 -10.84 1972 1699 128.6 — — — — -98 -107 +10 47.1% -0.29 5–2 (71%) 1–2 (33%) 103.2 -3.23
19 1976 2166 161.0 — — — — +4 -34 -73 70.4% +1.38 11–6 (65%) 4–1 (80%) 102.0 -6.41 1973 1627 126.7 — — — — -36 -91 — 24.6% -1.54 3–2 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 100.9 -3.41
20 1977 2251 173.4 — — — — +102 -69 -110 79.0% +2.21 7–7 (50%) 10–5 (67%) 100.7 -8.80 1974 1684 131.0 — — — — -38 -120 — 40.0% -0.75 5–4 (56%) 4–1 (80%) 105.8 -1.83
21 1978 2434 178.4 — — — — +35 -307 -96 84.1% +2.77 15–2 (88%) 5–10 (33%) 104.2 -6.56 1975 1784 141.4 — — — — -69 -51 — 49.3% -0.27 4–3 (57%) 6–1 (86%) 106.0 -1.61
22 1979 2440 178.7 — — — — +37 -222 -63 84.3% +2.59 11–3 (79%) 7–2 (78%) 102.8 -4.63 1976 1788 133.0 — — — — -63 -23 -148 45.2% -0.10 6–2 (75%) 2–7 (22%) 101.6 -2.81
23 1980 2367 177.3 — — — — +175 -69 -15 82.0% +2.50 17–6 (74%) 13–3 (81%) 101.9 -4.48 1977 1649 127.8 — — — — +26 +9 — 35.1% -1.01 6–5 (55%) 3–6 (33%) 99.4 -0.50
24 1981 2423 179.0 — — — — +104 -134 -12 80.4% +2.47 16–11 (59%) 7–9 (44%) 93.9 -8.43 1978 1602 95.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.67
25 1982 2539 179.0 — — — — +107 -124 -87 90.0% +3.08 13–3 (81%) 12–4 (75%) 104.0 -2.79 1979 1610 120.6 — — — — +45 — — 31.3% -1.81 1–1 — — -0.60
26 1983 2638 183.0 — — — — +115 -236 -76 94.9% +3.91 7–1 (88%) 5–0 (100%) 105.4 -2.30 1980 1609 110.6 — — — — +2 +54 — 47.7% -0.20 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.67
27 1984 2649 177.2 — — — — +103 -152 -65 94.0% +3.48 7–2 (78%) 7–1 (88%) 103.4 -1.21 1981 1609 104.8 — — — — +37 — — 36.4% -1.27 1–0 2–0 — +0.25
28 1985 2595 177.6 — — — — +45 -39 +99 90.1% +3.06 10–3 (77%) 9–4 (69%) 101.4 -1.95 1982 1576 93.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.12
29 1986 2634 182.2 — — — — +69 -119 +83 91.0% +3.03 12–2 (86%) 14–2 (88%) 107.4 -2.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 2527 176.8 — — — — +116 -43 +190 85.7% +2.83 3–2 (60%) 7–4 (64%) 99.6 -3.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 2456 176.7 — — — — +130 +15 +223 85.5% +2.93 10–3 (77%) 3–5 (38%) 94.4 -2.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 2425 176.2 — — — — +96 -16 +175 86.5% +2.82 7–4 (64%) 9–1 (90%) 98.0 -2.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 2323 174.5 — — — — +99 +62 +414 84.5% +2.88 6–5 (55%) 5–3 (63%) 94.9 -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1991 2322 172.3 — — — — +106 +3 +333 79.3% +2.24 10–4 (71%) 9–5 (64%) 101.2 -1.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1992 2328 175.0 — — — — +97 — +412 77.5% +2.13 6–6 (50%) 10–0 (100%) 98.4 -1.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1993 2265 172.8 — — — — +97 -12 +351 79.2% +2.30 9–3 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 100.2 -1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1994 2074 161.5 — — — — +133 +37 +402 64.9% +1.41 12–8 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 92.1 -1.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
45 2002 2052 102.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
47 2004 1941 100.2 +0.20 -0.26 1.142 52.8% — +91 — 33.3% -0.50 0–2 — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
48 2005 1911 97.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2680 180.0 +0.20 -0.26 1.142 52.8% +78 -38 +49 81.7% +2.48 220–109 (67%) 170–74 (70%) 105.4 -5.25 — 1866 133.0 — — — — -23 -46 -24 41.3% -0.61 36–23 (61%) 22–23 (49%) 108.5 -3.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.