H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Martina Navratilova vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 8-0

Martina Navratilova holds a 8–0 lead over Mary Joe Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Martina Navratilova leads 5–0 on carpet and 3–0 on grass. Most recently, Martina Navratilova won the 1991 Milan semifinal 6-2 3-6 6-4.

USA Age 69 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
8 0
8 main draw meetings
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 5, 1991* Milan WTA 250 SF Carpet Martina Navratilova #4 6-2 3-6 6-4 Mary Joe Fernandez #7 Match data
Jun 22, 1991* Eastbourne WTA 250 SF Grass Martina Navratilova #4 6-3 6-0 Mary Joe Fernandez #6 Match data
Nov 13, 1989 Virginia Slims Championships WTA Finals R16 Carpet Martina Navratilova #2 6-2 6-3 Mary Joe Fernandez #12 Match data
Sep 23, 1989* Dallas WTA 250 QF Carpet Martina Navratilova #2 7-5 0-6 6-1 Mary Joe Fernandez #13 Match data
Jun 24, 1989* Eastbourne WTA 250 QF Grass Martina Navratilova #2 7-6 6-1 Mary Joe Fernandez #16 Match data
Feb 5, 1989* Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 250 SF Carpet Martina Navratilova #2 6-2 6-2 Mary Joe Fernandez #14 Match data
Jun 18, 1988* Eastbourne WTA 250 SF Grass Martina Navratilova #2 6-2 6-3 Mary Joe Fernandez #16 Match data
Nov 13, 1987* Chicago WTA 250 R16 Carpet Martina Navratilova #2 6-4 6-3 Mary Joe Fernandez #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Martina Navratilova #395 #1 290 2,664 1,427 227 86.3% 18 8 8 15 120 168
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Navratilova Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 1984 0–2 0.0% 1,475 0 0
13 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 1972 1–1 50.0% 1,498 0 1 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 1973 20–17 54.1% 1,761 0 2 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1974 39–20 66.1% 1,975 0 4 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1975 81–21 79.4% 2,218 0 7 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1976 41–16 71.9% 2,153 0 9 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1977 67–15 81.7% 2,243 0 15 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1978 78–9 89.7% 2,420 1 26 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1979 91–12 88.3% 2,428 2 36 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 1980 86–12 87.8% 2,344 2 47 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 1981 90–15 85.7% 2,407 3 57 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 1982 85–3 96.6% 2,521 5 72 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 1983 84–1 98.8% 2,622 8 88 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 1984 78–2 97.5% #1 2,633 11 101 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 1985 84–5 94.4% #1 2,583 13 113 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7
29 1986 84–3 96.6% #1 2,626 15 126
30 1987 56–8 87.5% #2 2,523 17 130
31 1988 70–7 90.9% #2 2,452 17 139
32 1989 68–8 89.5% #2 2,393 17 147
33 1990 52–7 88.1% #3 2,306 18 153
34 1991 53–9 85.5% #4 2,316 18 158
35 1992 38–8 82.6% #5 2,326 18 162
36 1993 46–8 85.2% #3 2,264 18 167
37 1994 33–14 70.2% #8 2,073 18 168
45 2002 1–1 50.0% 2,051 18 168
47 2004 1–4 20.0% #388 1,940 18 168
48 2005 0–1 0.0% #395 1,910 18 168