H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Martina Navratilova vs Mary Lou Piatek H2H: 8-0

Martina Navratilova holds a 8–0 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Martina Navratilova leads 5–0 on carpet and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Martina Navratilova won the 1984 Australian Open third round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Navratilova
USA Age 69 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
8 – 0
8 main draw meetings
Mary Lou Piatek

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Dec 2, 1984* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Grass Martina Navratilova #1 6-2 6-1 Mary Lou Piatek Match data
Nov 22, 1984* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Grass Martina Navratilova #1 6-4 6-2 Mary Lou Piatek Match data
Sep 28, 1984* New Orleans WTA 250 R16 Carpet Martina Navratilova #1 6-2 6-0 Mary Lou Piatek Match data
May 25, 1983* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Martina Navratilova 6-1 6-1 Mary Lou Piatek Match data
Jan 3, 1983 Washington WTA 250 SF Carpet Martina Navratilova 6-1 6-3 Mary Lou Piatek Match data
Feb 13, 1982* Kansas City WTA 250 SF Carpet Martina Navratilova 6-2 6-2 Mary Lou Piatek Match data
Mar 14, 1981* Dallas WTA 250 QF Carpet Martina Navratilova 6-2 6-2 Mary Lou Piatek Match data
Jul 27, 1980* Richmond WTA 250 F Carpet Martina Navratilova 6-3 6-0 Mary Lou Piatek Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Martina Navratilova #395 #1 290 2,664 1,427 227 86.3% 18 8 8 15 120 168
Mary Lou Piatek — — — 1,936 153 206 42.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Martina Navratilova Mary Lou Piatek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1972 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 1 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
1973 20–17 54.1% — 1,761 0 2 1979 3–5 37.5% — 1,546 0 0
1974 39–20 66.1% — 1,975 0 4 1980 16–12 57.1% — 1,737 0 0
1975 81–21 79.4% — 2,218 0 7 1981 30–22 57.7% — 1,873 0 1
1976 41–16 71.9% — 2,153 0 9 1982 18–21 46.2% — 1,792 0 1
1977 67–15 81.7% — 2,243 0 15 1983 12–20 37.5% — 1,721 0 1
1978 78–9 89.7% — 2,420 1 26 1984 18–20 47.4% — 1,703 0 2
1979 91–12 88.3% — 2,428 2 36 1985 14–18 43.8% — 1,678 0 2
1980 86–12 87.8% — 2,344 2 47 1986 8–15 34.8% — 1,619 0 2
1981 90–15 85.7% — 2,407 3 57 1987 6–12 33.3% — 1,594 0 2
1982 85–3 96.6% — 2,521 5 72 1988 6–16 27.3% — 1,542 0 2
1983 84–1 98.8% — 2,622 8 88 1989 7–15 31.8% — 1,593 0 2
1984 78–2 97.5% #1 2,633 11 101 1990 8–11 42.1% — 1,612 0 2
1985 84–5 94.4% #1 2,583 13 113 1991 5–8 38.5% — 1,630 0 2
1986 84–3 96.6% #1 2,626 15 126 1992 1–8 11.1% — 1,560 0 2
1987 56–8 87.5% #2 2,523 17 130 1993 1–2 33.3% — 1,555 0 2
1988 70–7 90.9% #2 2,452 17 139 — — — — — — —
1989 68–8 89.5% #2 2,393 17 147 — — — — — — —
1990 52–7 88.1% #3 2,306 18 153 — — — — — — —
1991 53–9 85.5% #4 2,316 18 158 — — — — — — —
1992 38–8 82.6% #5 2,326 18 162 — — — — — — —
1993 46–8 85.2% #3 2,264 18 167 — — — — — — —
1994 33–14 70.2% #8 2,073 18 168 — — — — — — —
2002 1–1 50.0% — 2,051 18 168 — — — — — — —
2004 1–4 20.0% #388 1,940 18 168 — — — — — — —
2005 0–1 0.0% #395 1,910 18 168 — — — — — — —