H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Martina Navratilova vs Mima Jausovec H2H: 21-1

Martina Navratilova holds a 21–1 lead over Mima Jausovec in their WTA head-to-head. Across 22 main-draw meetings, Martina Navratilova leads 11–0 on carpet and 7–0 on clay. Most recently, Martina Navratilova won the 1984 Amelia Island round of 16 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Navratilova

USA Age 69 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H

21 – 1

22 main-draw meetings

Mima Jausovec

SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

.mobile-filter-details > .mobile-filter-details__toggle { display: none; } .mobile-filter-details > .mobile-filter-details__toggle + .mobile-filter-details__fields { display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap; }

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Martina Navratilova #1	6-1 7-5	Mima Jausovec #29	Match data	Apr 20, 1984*	R16	Amelia Island	Category 4 → modern equivalent WTA 500	Clay
Martina Navratilova	6-2 6-1	Mima Jausovec	Match data	Jun 26, 1983*	R32	Wimbledon	Grand Slam	Grass
Martina Navratilova	6-0 6-0	Mima Jausovec	Match data	Oct 23, 1982*	SF	Porsche Tennis Grand Prix	WTA 250	Carpet
Martina Navratilova	1-6 6-4 7-6	Mima Jausovec	Match data	May 1, 1982*	SF	Orlando	WTA 250	Clay
Martina Navratilova	6-1 3-6 6-2	Mima Jausovec	Match data	Apr 10, 1982*	SF	Hilton Head	WTA 250	Clay
Martina Navratilova	6-3 6-2	Mima Jausovec	Match data	Mar 14, 1982*	F	Dallas	WTA 250	Carpet
Martina Navratilova	6-2 6-4	Mima Jausovec	Match data	Dec 17, 1981*	R32	East Rutherford	WTA 250	Carpet
Martina Navratilova	6-3 6-2	Mima Jausovec	Match data	Apr 25, 1981*	SF	Amelia Island	WTA 250	Clay
Martina Navratilova	6-2 3-6 7-6	Mima Jausovec	Match data	Dec 5, 1980*	R16	Sydney International	WTA 500	Grass
Martina Navratilova	6-3 6-2	Mima Jausovec	Match data	Mar 7, 1980*	R16	Dallas	WTA 250	Carpet
Martina Navratilova	6-3 6-1	Mima Jausovec	Match data	Jan 18, 1980*	R16	Kansas City	WTA 250	Carpet
Martina Navratilova	7-5 6-2	Mima Jausovec	Match data	Nov 10, 1979*	SF	Porsche Tennis Grand Prix	WTA 250	Carpet
Martina Navratilova	6-1 6-2	Mima Jausovec	Match data	Apr 15, 1979*	QF	Hilton Head	WTA 250	Clay
Martina Navratilova	6-1 6-2	Mima Jausovec	Match data	Mar 16, 1978*	R32	Boston	WTA 250	Carpet
Martina Navratilova	6-2 6-3	Mima Jausovec	Match data	Feb 24, 1978*	R16	Detroit	WTA 250	Carpet
Martina Navratilova	6-3 6-4	Mima Jausovec	Match data	Sep 17, 1977*	QF	Tokyo Sillook	WTA 250	Hard
Martina Navratilova	6-4 6-1	Mima Jausovec	Match data	Sep 10, 1977*	QF	US Open	Grand Slam	Clay
Martina Navratilova	3-6 6-2 6-1	Mima Jausovec	Match data	Aug 29, 1977*	F	Charlotte	WTA 250	Clay
Martina Navratilova	6-2 6-1	Mima Jausovec	Match data	Jan 22, 1977*	SF	Houston	WTA 250	Carpet
Martina Navratilova	6-1 6-4	Mima Jausovec	Match data	Mar 19, 1976*	R16	Dallas	WTA 250	Carpet
Martina Navratilova	6-4 7-6(1)	Mima Jausovec	Match data	Feb 28, 1976*	QF	Sarasota	WTA 250	Carpet
Mima Jausovec	6-4 3-6 6-3	Martina Navratilova	Match data	Jun 26, 1974*	R128	Wimbledon	Grand Slam	Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Martina Navratilova	#395	#1	290	2,680	1,419	228	86.2%	18	3	8	38	100	167
Mima Jausovec	#400	#23	2	2,090	339	246	57.9%	1	0	0	1	5	7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Martina Navratilova							Mima Jausovec
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
15	1972	0–1	0.0%	—	1,483	0	0	1972	2–0	100.0%	—	1,533	0	1
16	1973	17–17	50.0%	—	1,741	0	0	1973	2–1	66.7%	—	1,560	0	1
17	1974	34–20	63.0%	—	1,960	0	1	1974	18–13	58.1%	—	1,793	0	1
18	1975	82–22	78.8%	#3	2,246	0	5	1975	16–19	45.7%	—	1,833	0	1
19	1976	41–16	71.9%	#4	2,166	0	7	1976	33–16	67.3%	—	2,004	0	4
20	1977	67–15	81.7%	#3	2,250	0	13	1977	32–21	60.4%	—	2,010	1	5
21	1978	78–9	89.7%	#1	2,433	1	24	1978	29–19	60.4%	—	1,947	1	6
22	1979	91–12	88.3%	#1	2,439	2	34	1979	32–28	53.3%	—	1,870	1	6
23	1980	86–12	87.8%	#3	2,366	2	45	1980	34–22	60.7%	—	1,945	1	6
24	1981	90–15	85.7%	#3	2,423	3	55	1981	57–28	67.1%	—	2,013	1	6
25	1982	85–3	96.6%	#1	2,538	5	70	1982	36–24	60.0%	—	1,857	1	7
26	1983	84–1	98.8%	#1	2,638	8	86	1983	23–16	59.0%	—	1,873	1	7
27	1984	78–2	97.5%	#1	2,649	11	99	1984	12–17	41.4%	#87	1,747	1	7
28	1985	84–5	94.4%	#1	2,595	13	111	1985	9–12	42.9%	#82	1,695	1	7
29	1986	84–3	96.6%	#1	2,633	15	125	1986	2–4	33.3%	#184	1,673	1	7
30	1987	56–8	87.5%	#2	2,527	17	129	1987	1–3	25.0%	#233	1,656	1	7
31	1988	70–7	90.9%	#2	2,455	17	138	1988	1–3	25.0%	#362	1,641	1	7
32	1989	68–8	89.5%	#2	2,425	17	146	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1990	52–7	88.1%	#3	2,322	18	152	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1991	53–9	85.5%	#4	2,321	18	157	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	1992	38–8	82.6%	#5	2,328	18	161	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1993	46–8	85.2%	#3	2,265	18	166	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	1994	33–14	70.2%	#8	2,073	18	167	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
45	2002	1–1	50.0%	—	2,051	18	167	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
47	2004	1–4	20.0%	#388	1,940	18	167	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
48	2005	0–1	0.0%	#395	1,910	18	167	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Martina Navratilova																	Mima Jausovec
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
15	1972	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1972	—	—	—	—	2	0	2	100.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1973	0	2	2	0.0%	15	11	26	57.7%	2	2	4	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	1973	—	—	—	—	2	1	3	66.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1974	1	3	4	25.0%	16	4	20	80.0%	10	6	16	62.5%	7	7	14	50.0%	1974	0	2	2	0.0%	7	4	11	63.6%	6	3	9	66.7%	5	4	9	55.6%
18	1975	25	7	32	78.1%	25	7	32	78.1%	9	3	12	75.0%	23	5	28	82.1%	1975	2	3	5	40.0%	9	5	14	64.3%	3	2	5	60.0%	2	9	11	18.2%
19	1976	10	4	14	71.4%	1	2	3	33.3%	14	2	16	87.5%	16	8	24	66.7%	1976	0	2	2	0.0%	21	3	24	87.5%	3	2	5	60.0%	9	9	18	50.0%
20	1977	17	6	23	73.9%	10	1	11	90.9%	9	3	12	75.0%	31	5	36	86.1%	1977	1	2	3	33.3%	20	6	26	76.9%	1	2	3	33.3%	10	11	21	47.6%
21	1978	20	4	24	83.3%	2	1	3	66.7%	13	0	13	100.0%	43	4	47	91.5%	1978	2	3	5	40.0%	13	4	17	76.5%	7	3	10	70.0%	7	9	16	43.8%
22	1979	14	3	17	82.4%	4	1	5	80.0%	14	2	16	87.5%	59	6	65	90.8%	1979	6	7	13	46.2%	9	6	15	60.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	16	13	29	55.2%
23	1980	18	5	23	78.3%	9	0	9	100.0%	12	4	16	75.0%	47	3	50	94.0%	1980	8	3	11	72.7%	4	3	7	57.1%	6	3	9	66.7%	16	13	29	55.2%
24	1981	14	2	16	87.5%	11	3	14	78.6%	21	4	25	84.0%	44	6	50	88.0%	1981	4	3	7	57.1%	15	6	21	71.4%	10	5	15	66.7%	28	14	42	66.7%
25	1982	12	1	13	92.3%	15	0	15	100.0%	21	1	22	95.5%	37	1	38	97.4%	1982	2	4	6	33.3%	9	5	14	64.3%	2	5	7	28.6%	23	10	33	69.7%
26	1983	22	0	22	100.0%	12	1	13	92.3%	19	0	19	100.0%	31	0	31	100.0%	1983	6	4	10	60.0%	13	6	19	68.4%	3	2	5	60.0%	1	4	5	20.0%
27	1984	17	0	17	100.0%	16	0	16	100.0%	27	1	28	96.4%	18	1	19	94.7%	1984	2	3	5	40.0%	10	7	17	58.8%	0	2	2	0.0%	0	5	5	0.0%
28	1985	24	3	27	88.9%	14	1	15	93.3%	29	0	29	100.0%	17	1	18	94.4%	1985	2	5	7	28.6%	7	5	12	58.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
29	1986	17	0	17	100.0%	10	2	12	83.3%	13	0	13	100.0%	44	1	45	97.8%	1986	0	1	1	0.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—
30	1987	15	2	17	88.2%	13	3	16	81.3%	17	2	19	89.5%	11	1	12	91.7%	1987	—	—	—	—	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
31	1988	26	3	29	89.7%	17	2	19	89.5%	12	1	13	92.3%	15	1	16	93.8%	1988	0	1	1	0.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1989	28	3	31	90.3%	6	2	8	75.0%	17	1	18	94.4%	17	2	19	89.5%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1990	12	2	14	85.7%	14	3	17	82.4%	13	0	13	100.0%	13	2	15	86.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1991	15	2	17	88.2%	6	3	9	66.7%	15	1	16	93.8%	17	3	20	85.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	1992	14	1	15	93.3%	1	1	2	50.0%	6	2	8	75.0%	17	4	21	81.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1993	15	2	17	88.2%	2	1	3	66.7%	12	2	14	85.7%	17	3	20	85.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	1994	8	2	10	80.0%	7	5	12	58.3%	8	2	10	80.0%	10	5	15	66.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
45	2002	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
47	2004	—	—	—	—	0	3	3	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
48	2005	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	344	57	401	85.8%	226	58	284	79.6%	315	42	357	88.2%	534	71	605	88.3%	—	35	43	78	44.9%	145	67	212	68.4%	42	33	75	56.0%	117	103	220	53.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Martina Navratilova																Mima Jausovec
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
15	1972	1483	98.4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	33.3%	-0.67	0–1	—	—	+0.21	1972	1533	109.9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	100.0%	+3.75	—	—	—	+0.55
16	1973	1742	151.2	—	—	—	—	-211	+47	-161	52.0%	+0.01	4–5 (44%)	2–3 (40%)	100.5	-2.70	1973	1561	114.8	—	—	—	—	—	+38	—	57.1%	+1.57	1–0	—	—	+0.21
17	1974	1961	159.8	—	—	—	—	-284	+114	-237	60.3%	+0.74	12–11 (52%)	11–4 (73%)	109.9	-9.92	1974	1794	144.8	—	—	—	—	-138	-70	-107	55.2%	+0.37	4–3 (57%)	4–5 (44%)	102.8	-1.90
18	1975	2247	173.0	—	—	—	—	+6	-18	-381	75.8%	+1.74	14–7 (67%)	11–2 (85%)	111.4	-10.84	1975	1833	146.7	—	—	—	—	-145	+20	-114	48.1%	-0.05	7–6 (54%)	2–2 (50%)	101.7	-1.97
19	1976	2166	161.0	—	—	—	—	+4	-34	-73	70.4%	+1.38	11–6 (65%)	4–1 (80%)	102.0	-6.41	1976	2004	156.6	—	—	—	—	-268	+60	-233	61.6%	+1.23	11–5 (69%)	4–6 (40%)	104.5	-3.78
20	1977	2251	173.4	—	—	—	—	+102	-69	-110	79.0%	+2.21	7–7 (50%)	10–5 (67%)	100.7	-8.80	1977	2011	161.6	—	—	—	—	-207	+128	-274	61.5%	+0.98	5–10 (33%)	7–4 (64%)	95.6	-5.51
21	1978	2434	178.4	—	—	—	—	+35	-307	-96	84.1%	+2.77	15–2 (88%)	5–10 (33%)	104.2	-6.56	1978	1947	147.6	—	—	—	—	-137	+161	-129	58.9%	+0.51	10–5 (67%)	3–5 (38%)	100.0	-3.80
22	1979	2440	178.7	—	—	—	—	+37	-222	-63	84.3%	+2.59	11–3 (79%)	7–2 (78%)	102.8	-4.63	1979	1871	146.4	—	—	—	—	-10	+166	-109	54.4%	+0.40	6–10 (38%)	5–5 (50%)	95.8	-0.84
23	1980	2367	177.3	—	—	—	—	+175	-69	-15	82.0%	+2.50	17–6 (74%)	13–3 (81%)	101.9	-4.48	1980	1945	155.9	—	—	—	—	+3	+49	-109	58.7%	+0.84	6–3 (67%)	3–9 (25%)	100.1	-3.63
24	1981	2423	179.0	—	—	—	—	+104	-134	-12	80.4%	+2.47	16–11 (59%)	7–9 (44%)	93.9	-8.43	1981	2013	157.1	—	—	—	—	0	+4	-103	63.1%	+1.07	16–11 (59%)	11–4 (73%)	104.3	-2.76
25	1982	2539	179.0	—	—	—	—	+107	-124	-87	90.0%	+3.08	13–3 (81%)	12–4 (75%)	104.0	-2.79	1982	1858	148.5	—	—	—	—	+114	+111	-66	59.3%	+0.50	9–13 (41%)	9–3 (75%)	95.9	-0.56
26	1983	2638	183.0	—	—	—	—	+115	-236	-76	94.9%	+3.91	7–1 (88%)	5–0 (100%)	105.4	-2.30	1983	1874	143.9	—	—	—	—	-17	+151	-63	58.4%	+0.64	5–6 (45%)	2–5 (29%)	94.5	-2.67
27	1984	2649	177.2	—	—	—	—	+103	-152	-65	94.0%	+3.48	7–2 (78%)	7–1 (88%)	103.4	-1.21	1984	1748	131.7	—	—	—	—	-27	+199	—	46.8%	-0.18	1–5 (17%)	2–5 (29%)	88.9	-1.31
28	1985	2595	177.6	—	—	—	—	+45	-39	+99	90.1%	+3.06	10–3 (77%)	9–4 (69%)	101.4	-1.95	1985	1695	127.6	—	—	—	—	-21	+205	—	45.8%	-0.33	2–4 (33%)	2–2 (50%)	94.8	-0.67
29	1986	2634	182.2	—	—	—	—	+69	-119	+83	91.0%	+3.03	12–2 (86%)	14–2 (88%)	107.4	-2.24	1986	1673	105.7	—	—	—	—	—	+197	—	40.0%	-1.80	1–2 (33%)	1–0	—	-0.18
30	1987	2527	176.8	—	—	—	—	+116	-43	+190	85.7%	+2.83	3–2 (60%)	7–4 (64%)	99.6	-3.06	1987	1656	107.2	—	—	—	—	—	+179	—	40.0%	-1.60	0–2	—	—	-0.33
31	1988	2456	176.7	—	—	—	—	+130	+15	+223	85.5%	+2.93	10–3 (77%)	3–5 (38%)	94.4	-2.10	1988	1641	110.1	—	—	—	—	—	+162	—	25.0%	-2.75	—	—	—	-0.77
32	1989	2425	176.2	—	—	—	—	+96	-16	+175	86.5%	+2.82	7–4 (64%)	9–1 (90%)	98.0	-2.04	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1990	2323	174.5	—	—	—	—	+99	+62	+414	84.5%	+2.88	6–5 (55%)	5–3 (63%)	94.9	-0.34	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1991	2322	172.3	—	—	—	—	+106	+3	+333	79.3%	+2.24	10–4 (71%)	9–5 (64%)	101.2	-1.85	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	1992	2328	175.0	—	—	—	—	+97	—	+412	77.5%	+2.13	6–6 (50%)	10–0 (100%)	98.4	-1.40	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1993	2265	172.8	—	—	—	—	+97	-12	+351	79.2%	+2.30	9–3 (75%)	5–2 (71%)	100.2	-1.33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	1994	2074	161.5	—	—	—	—	+133	+37	+402	64.9%	+1.41	12–8 (60%)	5–4 (56%)	92.1	-1.09	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
45	2002	2052	102.7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	50.0%	+0.50	1–1	—	—	-0.01	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
47	2004	1941	100.2	+0.20	-0.26	1.142	52.8%	—	+91	—	33.3%	-0.50	0–2	—	—	+0.11	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
48	2005	1911	97.9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	33.3%	-1.67	0–1	—	—	+0.08	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	2680	180.0	+0.20	-0.26	1.142	52.8%	+78	-38	+49	81.7%	+2.48	220–109 (67%)	170–74 (70%)	105.4	-5.25	—	2091	156.0	—	—	—	—	-46	+105	-119	57.2%	+0.57	84–85 (50%)	55–55 (50%)	94.6	-5.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Martina Navratilova's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Chris Evert	44	38	82	Nov 13, 1988	H2H
Pam Shriver	39	3	42	Mar 28, 1992	H2H
Hana Mandlikova	27	8	35	Aug 12, 1989	H2H
Zina Garrison	33	1	34	Nov 7, 1993	H2H
Wendy Turnbull	30	4	34	Feb 19, 1988	H2H

Mima Jausovec's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Martina Navratilova	1	21	22	Apr 20, 1984	H2H
Virginia Wade	2	14	16	Mar 15, 1980	H2H
Chris Evert	0	15	15	Jun 5, 1983	H2H
Virginia Ruzici	4	9	13	Jul 21, 1985	H2H
Regina Marsikova	7	4	11	May 23, 1981	H2H