H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Martina Navratilova vs Mima Jausovec H2H: 21-1

Martina Navratilova holds a 21–1 lead over Mima Jausovec in their WTA head-to-head. Across 22 main-draw meetings, Martina Navratilova leads 11–0 on carpet and 7–0 on clay. Most recently, Martina Navratilova won the 1984 Amelia Island Championships round of 16 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Navratilova
USA Age 70 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
21 – 1
22 main-draw meetings
Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martina Navratilova #1 6-1 7-5 Mima Jausovec #29 Match data Apr 20, 1984* R16 Amelia Island Championships WTA 500 Clay
Martina Navratilova 6-2 6-1 Mima Jausovec Match data Jun 26, 1983* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Martina Navratilova 6-0 6-0 Mima Jausovec Match data Oct 23, 1982* SF Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 500 Carpet
Martina Navratilova 1-6 6-4 7-6 Mima Jausovec Match data May 1, 1982* SF Orlando WTA 250 Clay
Martina Navratilova 6-1 3-6 6-2 Mima Jausovec Match data Apr 10, 1982* SF Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay
Martina Navratilova 6-3 6-2 Mima Jausovec Match data Mar 14, 1982* F Dallas WTA 250 Carpet
Martina Navratilova 6-2 6-4 Mima Jausovec Match data Dec 17, 1981* R32 East Rutherford WTA 250 Carpet
Martina Navratilova 6-3 6-2 Mima Jausovec Match data Apr 25, 1981* SF Amelia Island Championships WTA 250 Clay
Martina Navratilova 6-2 3-6 7-6 Mima Jausovec Match data Dec 5, 1980* R16 Sydney International WTA 500 Grass
Martina Navratilova 6-3 6-2 Mima Jausovec Match data Mar 7, 1980* R16 Dallas WTA 250 Carpet
Martina Navratilova 6-3 6-1 Mima Jausovec Match data Jan 18, 1980* R16 Kansas City WTA 250 Carpet
Martina Navratilova 7-5 6-2 Mima Jausovec Match data Nov 10, 1979* SF Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 500 Carpet
Martina Navratilova 6-1 6-2 Mima Jausovec Match data Apr 14, 1979* QF Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay
Martina Navratilova 6-1 6-2 Mima Jausovec Match data Mar 16, 1978* R32 Boston WTA 250 Carpet
Martina Navratilova 6-2 6-3 Mima Jausovec Match data Feb 24, 1978* R16 Detroit WTA 250 Carpet
Martina Navratilova 6-3 6-4 Mima Jausovec Match data Sep 17, 1977* QF Tokyo Sillook WTA 250 Hard
Martina Navratilova 6-4 6-1 Mima Jausovec Match data Sep 10, 1977* QF US Open Grand Slam Clay
Martina Navratilova 3-6 6-2 6-1 Mima Jausovec Match data Aug 29, 1977* F Charlotte WTA 250 Clay
Martina Navratilova 6-2 6-1 Mima Jausovec Match data Jan 22, 1977* SF Houston WTA 250 Carpet
Martina Navratilova 6-1 6-4 Mima Jausovec Match data Mar 19, 1976* R16 Dallas WTA 250 Carpet
Martina Navratilova 6-4 7-6(1) Mima Jausovec Match data Feb 28, 1976* QF Sarasota WTA 250 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 6-4 3-6 6-3 Martina Navratilova Match data Jun 26, 1974* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martina Navratilova — #1 290 2,683 1,419 230 86.1% 18 3 8 51 87 167
Mima Jausovec — #23 2 2,092 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Navratilova Mima Jausovec
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1
16 1973 17–17 50.0% — 1,741 0 0 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1
17 1974 34–20 63.0% — 1,960 0 1 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1
18 1975 82–22 78.8% #3 2,247 0 5 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1
19 1976 41–16 71.9% #4 2,171 0 7 1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,006 0 4
20 1977 67–15 81.7% #3 2,254 0 13 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5
21 1978 78–10 88.6% #1 2,411 1 24 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6
22 1979 91–12 88.3% #1 2,438 2 34 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,872 1 6
23 1980 86–13 86.9% #3 2,360 2 45 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,947 1 6
24 1981 90–15 85.7% #3 2,426 3 55 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,015 1 6
25 1982 85–3 96.6% #1 2,541 5 70 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,859 1 7
26 1983 84–1 98.8% #1 2,641 8 86 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,874 1 7
27 1984 78–2 97.5% #1 2,651 11 99 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,748 1 7
28 1985 84–5 94.4% #1 2,597 13 111 1985 9–12 42.9% — 1,695 1 7
29 1986 84–3 96.6% #1 2,635 15 125 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7
30 1987 56–8 87.5% #2 2,528 17 129 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7
31 1988 70–7 90.9% #2 2,456 17 138 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7
32 1989 68–8 89.5% #2 2,425 17 146 — — — — — — —
33 1990 52–7 88.1% #3 2,323 18 152 — — — — — — —
34 1991 53–9 85.5% #4 2,322 18 157 — — — — — — —
35 1992 38–8 82.6% #5 2,328 18 161 — — — — — — —
36 1993 46–8 85.2% #3 2,265 18 166 — — — — — — —
37 1994 33–14 70.2% #8 2,073 18 167 — — — — — — —
45 2002 1–1 50.0% — 2,051 18 167 — — — — — — —
47 2004 1–4 20.0% #388 1,940 18 167 — — — — — — —
48 2005 0–1 0.0% — 1,910 18 167 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martina Navratilova Mima Jausovec
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1972 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1973 0 2 2 0.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
17 1974 1 3 4 25.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
18 1975 25 7 32 78.1% 25 7 32 78.1% 9 3 12 75.0% 23 5 28 82.1% 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2%
19 1976 10 4 14 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 2 16 87.5% 16 8 24 66.7% 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0%
20 1977 17 6 23 73.9% 10 1 11 90.9% 9 3 12 75.0% 31 5 36 86.1% 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6%
21 1978 20 4 24 83.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 0 13 100.0% 43 4 47 91.5% 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8%
22 1979 14 3 17 82.4% 4 1 5 80.0% 14 2 16 87.5% 59 6 65 90.8% 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2%
23 1980 18 6 24 75.0% 9 0 9 100.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 47 3 50 94.0% 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2%
24 1981 14 2 16 87.5% 11 3 14 78.6% 21 4 25 84.0% 44 6 50 88.0% 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7%
25 1982 12 1 13 92.3% 15 0 15 100.0% 21 1 22 95.5% 37 1 38 97.4% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7%
26 1983 22 0 22 100.0% 12 1 13 92.3% 19 0 19 100.0% 31 0 31 100.0% 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 1984 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 27 1 28 96.4% 18 1 19 94.7% 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
28 1985 24 3 27 88.9% 14 1 15 93.3% 29 0 29 100.0% 17 1 18 94.4% 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1986 17 0 17 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 13 0 13 100.0% 44 1 45 97.8% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 1987 15 2 17 88.2% 13 3 16 81.3% 17 2 19 89.5% 11 1 12 91.7% 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1988 26 3 29 89.7% 17 2 19 89.5% 12 1 13 92.3% 15 1 16 93.8% 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
32 1989 28 3 31 90.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 17 1 18 94.4% 17 2 19 89.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 12 2 14 85.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 13 0 13 100.0% 13 2 15 86.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1991 15 2 17 88.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 15 1 16 93.8% 17 3 20 85.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1992 14 1 15 93.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 17 4 21 81.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1993 15 2 17 88.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 12 2 14 85.7% 17 3 20 85.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1994 8 2 10 80.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
45 2002 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
47 2004 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
48 2005 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 344 58 402 85.6% 226 58 284 79.6% 315 42 357 88.2% 534 71 605 88.3% — 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martina Navratilova Mima Jausovec
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1972 1483 98.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.21 1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55
16 1973 1742 151.2 — — — — -211 +47 -161 52.0% +0.01 4–5 (44%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -2.94 1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.17
17 1974 1961 159.8 — — — — -284 +114 -237 60.3% +0.74 12–11 (52%) 11–4 (73%) 109.9 -10.07 1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -2.15
18 1975 2248 173.0 — — — — +7 -18 -381 75.8% +1.74 14–7 (67%) 11–2 (85%) 111.5 -12.63 1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -2.20
19 1976 2171 161.3 — — — — +2 -37 -76 70.4% +1.38 11–6 (65%) 4–1 (80%) 102.0 -6.18 1976 2006 156.7 — — — — -269 +59 -235 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -4.08
20 1977 2254 173.5 — — — — +99 -71 -111 79.0% +2.21 7–7 (50%) 10–5 (67%) 100.7 -8.88 1977 2011 161.8 — — — — -204 +129 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.46
21 1978 2411 178.8 — — — — +64 -284 -71 83.2% +2.69 15–2 (88%) 5–10 (33%) 104.2 -7.28 1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -139 +160 -130 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.1 -4.09
22 1979 2439 178.9 — — — — +41 -219 -58 84.3% +2.59 11–3 (79%) 7–2 (78%) 102.8 -4.91 1979 1873 146.6 — — — — -11 +165 -111 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.9 +0.01
23 1980 2360 177.9 — — — — +171 -59 -3 81.3% +2.45 17–6 (74%) 13–3 (81%) 102.1 -5.38 1980 1947 156.3 — — — — +4 +49 -112 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.84
24 1981 2426 179.3 — — — — +101 -134 -12 80.4% +2.47 16–11 (59%) 7–9 (44%) 94.1 -8.88 1981 2015 157.3 — — — — -1 +4 -104 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.23
25 1982 2542 179.1 — — — — +105 -126 -87 90.0% +3.08 13–3 (81%) 12–4 (75%) 104.0 -3.08 1982 1859 148.8 — — — — +114 +111 -67 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 +1.20
26 1983 2641 183.1 — — — — +115 -238 -77 94.9% +3.91 7–1 (88%) 5–0 (100%) 105.4 -2.54 1983 1875 144.0 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.60
27 1984 2652 177.3 — — — — +102 -154 -67 94.0% +3.48 7–2 (78%) 7–1 (88%) 103.4 -1.21 1984 1748 131.8 — — — — -26 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.24
28 1985 2597 177.7 — — — — +45 -40 +98 90.1% +3.06 10–3 (77%) 9–4 (69%) 101.4 -2.02 1985 1696 127.7 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.55
29 1986 2635 182.2 — — — — +71 -120 +83 91.0% +3.03 12–2 (86%) 14–2 (88%) 107.4 -2.42 1986 1674 105.7 — — — — — +196 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.21
30 1987 2529 176.8 — — — — +116 -44 +190 85.7% +2.83 3–2 (60%) 7–4 (64%) 99.6 -3.19 1987 1657 107.2 — — — — — +178 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.39
31 1988 2457 176.8 — — — — +130 +14 +224 85.5% +2.93 10–3 (77%) 3–5 (38%) 94.4 -2.28 1988 1642 110.1 — — — — — +161 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77
32 1989 2426 176.3 — — — — +96 -17 +175 86.5% +2.82 7–4 (64%) 9–1 (90%) 98.0 -1.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 2323 174.5 — — — — +100 +63 +416 84.5% +2.88 6–5 (55%) 5–3 (63%) 94.9 -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1991 2322 172.3 — — — — +107 +4 +335 79.3% +2.24 10–4 (71%) 9–5 (64%) 101.2 -1.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1992 2329 175.0 — — — — +96 — +413 77.5% +2.13 6–6 (50%) 10–0 (100%) 98.4 -1.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1993 2266 172.8 — — — — +96 -13 +353 79.2% +2.30 9–3 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 100.1 -1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1994 2074 161.5 — — — — +132 +37 +403 64.9% +1.41 12–8 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 92.1 -1.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
45 2002 2052 102.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
47 2004 1941 100.2 +0.20 -0.26 1.142 52.8% — +91 — 33.3% -0.50 0–2 — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
48 2005 1911 97.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2683 180.1 +0.20 -0.26 1.142 52.8% +80 -38 +50 81.7% +2.48 220–109 (67%) 170–74 (70%) 105.5 -5.56 — 2093 156.2 — — — — -46 +105 -120 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -4.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.