H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Martina Navratilova vs Olga Morozova H2H: 5-2

Martina Navratilova holds a 5–2 lead over Olga Morozova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while Martina Navratilova leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Martina Navratilova won the 1977 Minneapolis semifinal 6-4 6-3.

USA Age 70 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main-draw meetings
URS Age 77 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martina Navratilova 6-4 6-3 Olga Morozova Match data Jan 29, 1977* SF Minneapolis WTA 250 Carpet
Martina Navratilova 7-6(2) 6-3 Olga Morozova Match data Apr 26, 1975* SF Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay
Martina Navratilova 6-4 4-6 6-4 Olga Morozova Match data Mar 29, 1975* QF Philadelphia WTA 250 Hard
Martina Navratilova 7-6(1) 6-2 Olga Morozova Match data Feb 15, 1975* QF Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Martina Navratilova 4-6 7-5 7-6(2) Olga Morozova Match data Sep 15, 1973* QF Charlotte WTA 250 Clay
Olga Morozova 6-2 12-10 Martina Navratilova Match data Aug 14, 1973* QF Pescara WTA 250 Clay
Olga Morozova 6-3 4-6 6-3 Martina Navratilova Match data Jun 7, 1973* R32 Italian Open WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martina Navratilova — #1 290 2,683 1,419 230 86.1% 18 3 8 51 87 167
Olga Morozova — #7 — 2,221 325 107 75.2% 0 0 0 8 29 37

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Navratilova Olga Morozova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1973 17–17 50.0% — 1,741 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1974 34–20 63.0% — 1,960 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1975 82–22 78.8% #3 2,247 0 5 — — — — — — —
19 1976 41–16 71.9% #4 2,171 0 7 1968 14–10 58.3% — 1,571 0 1
20 1977 67–15 81.7% #3 2,254 0 13 1969 30–10 75.0% — 1,766 0 5
21 1978 78–10 88.6% #1 2,411 1 24 1970 41–9 82.0% — 1,912 0 13
22 1979 91–12 88.3% #1 2,438 2 34 1971 22–8 73.3% — 1,873 0 17
23 1980 86–13 86.9% #3 2,360 2 45 1972 53–13 80.3% — 1,975 0 24
24 1981 90–15 85.7% #3 2,426 3 55 1973 35–11 76.1% — 2,014 0 28
25 1982 85–3 96.6% #1 2,541 5 70 1974 55–13 80.9% — 2,209 0 32
26 1983 84–1 98.8% #1 2,641 8 86 1975 41–18 69.5% #7 2,068 0 34
27 1984 78–2 97.5% #1 2,651 11 99 1976 25–10 71.4% #9 2,066 0 35
28 1985 84–5 94.4% #1 2,597 13 111 1977 6–5 54.5% — 2,045 0 35
29 1986 84–3 96.6% #1 2,635 15 125 — — — — — — —
30 1987 56–8 87.5% #2 2,528 17 129 1979 2–0 100.0% — 2,056 0 36
31 1988 70–7 90.9% #2 2,456 17 138 1980 1–0 100.0% — 2,057 0 37
32 1989 68–8 89.5% #2 2,425 17 146 — — — — — — —
33 1990 52–7 88.1% #3 2,323 18 152 — — — — — — —
34 1991 53–9 85.5% #4 2,322 18 157 — — — — — — —
35 1992 38–8 82.6% #5 2,328 18 161 — — — — — — —
36 1993 46–8 85.2% #3 2,265 18 166 — — — — — — —
37 1994 33–14 70.2% #8 2,073 18 167 — — — — — — —
45 2002 1–1 50.0% — 2,051 18 167 — — — — — — —
47 2004 1–4 20.0% #388 1,940 18 167 — — — — — — —
48 2005 0–1 0.0% — 1,910 18 167 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martina Navratilova Olga Morozova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1972 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 0 2 2 0.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 1 3 4 25.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 25 7 32 78.1% 25 7 32 78.1% 9 3 12 75.0% 23 5 28 82.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1976 10 4 14 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 2 16 87.5% 16 8 24 66.7% 1968 — — — — 8 4 12 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
20 1977 17 6 23 73.9% 10 1 11 90.9% 9 3 12 75.0% 31 5 36 86.1% 1969 — — — — 12 7 19 63.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 0 9 100.0%
21 1978 20 4 24 83.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 0 13 100.0% 43 4 47 91.5% 1970 — — — — 11 2 13 84.6% 15 6 21 71.4% 9 1 10 90.0%
22 1979 14 3 17 82.4% 4 1 5 80.0% 14 2 16 87.5% 59 6 65 90.8% 1971 — — — — 7 2 9 77.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 0 4 100.0%
23 1980 18 6 24 75.0% 9 0 9 100.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 47 3 50 94.0% 1972 — — — — 13 4 17 76.5% 30 7 37 81.1% 5 2 7 71.4%
24 1981 14 2 16 87.5% 11 3 14 78.6% 21 4 25 84.0% 44 6 50 88.0% 1973 — — — — 11 3 14 78.6% 12 3 15 80.0% 12 5 17 70.6%
25 1982 12 1 13 92.3% 15 0 15 100.0% 21 1 22 95.5% 37 1 38 97.4% 1974 — — — — 15 6 21 71.4% 24 5 29 82.8% 16 2 18 88.9%
26 1983 22 0 22 100.0% 12 1 13 92.3% 19 0 19 100.0% 31 0 31 100.0% 1975 6 3 9 66.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 13 7 20 65.0%
27 1984 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 27 1 28 96.4% 18 1 19 94.7% 1976 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 2 15 86.7% 9 6 15 60.0%
28 1985 24 3 27 88.9% 14 1 15 93.3% 29 0 29 100.0% 17 1 18 94.4% 1977 — — — — — — — — — — — — 6 5 11 54.5%
29 1986 17 0 17 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 13 0 13 100.0% 44 1 45 97.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 15 2 17 88.2% 13 3 16 81.3% 17 2 19 89.5% 11 1 12 91.7% 1979 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — —
31 1988 26 3 29 89.7% 17 2 19 89.5% 12 1 13 92.3% 15 1 16 93.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 28 3 31 90.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 17 1 18 94.4% 17 2 19 89.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 12 2 14 85.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 13 0 13 100.0% 13 2 15 86.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1991 15 2 17 88.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 15 1 16 93.8% 17 3 20 85.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1992 14 1 15 93.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 17 4 21 81.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1993 15 2 17 88.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 12 2 14 85.7% 17 3 20 85.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1994 8 2 10 80.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
45 2002 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
47 2004 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
48 2005 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 344 58 402 85.6% 226 58 284 79.6% 315 42 357 88.2% 534 71 605 88.3% — 8 4 12 66.7% 90 33 123 73.2% 121 38 159 76.1% 87 31 118 73.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martina Navratilova Olga Morozova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1972 1483 98.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1742 151.2 — — — — -211 +47 -161 52.0% +0.01 4–5 (44%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -2.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 1961 159.8 — — — — -284 +114 -237 60.3% +0.74 12–11 (52%) 11–4 (73%) 109.9 -10.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 2248 173.0 — — — — +7 -18 -381 75.8% +1.74 14–7 (67%) 11–2 (85%) 111.5 -12.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1976 2171 161.3 — — — — +2 -37 -76 70.4% +1.38 11–6 (65%) 4–1 (80%) 102.0 -6.18 1968 1571 109.1 — — — — -7 +18 -53 54.7% +0.41 4–3 (57%) — — +1.00
20 1977 2254 173.5 — — — — +99 -71 -111 79.0% +2.21 7–7 (50%) 10–5 (67%) 100.7 -8.88 1969 1766 133.7 — — — — +72 -72 -119 70.9% +1.50 5–3 (63%) — — +1.35
21 1978 2411 178.8 — — — — +64 -284 -71 83.2% +2.69 15–2 (88%) 5–10 (33%) 104.2 -7.28 1970 1913 140.4 — — — — -10 -85 -65 75.9% +1.89 8–4 (67%) — — +1.77
22 1979 2439 178.9 — — — — +41 -219 -58 84.3% +2.59 11–3 (79%) 7–2 (78%) 102.8 -4.91 1971 1874 134.0 — — — — +62 -36 -12 67.6% +1.50 6–2 (75%) 1–1 — +0.73
23 1980 2360 177.9 — — — — +171 -59 -3 81.3% +2.45 17–6 (74%) 13–3 (81%) 102.1 -5.38 1972 1975 148.0 — — — — -47 -51 +58 75.2% +2.13 10–5 (67%) 0–4 (0%) 99.6 +4.17
24 1981 2426 179.3 — — — — +101 -134 -12 80.4% +2.47 16–11 (59%) 7–9 (44%) 94.1 -8.88 1973 2014 149.3 — — — — -72 -48 +78 71.7% +1.76 8–6 (57%) 0–1 — +1.84
25 1982 2542 179.1 — — — — +105 -126 -87 90.0% +3.08 13–3 (81%) 12–4 (75%) 104.0 -3.08 1974 2210 166.2 — — — — -35 -160 +47 74.5% +1.65 12–3 (80%) 4–1 (80%) 111.8 -8.67
26 1983 2641 183.1 — — — — +115 -238 -77 94.9% +3.91 7–1 (88%) 5–0 (100%) 105.4 -2.54 1975 2068 159.9 — — — — +44 -18 +141 64.3% +1.22 12–3 (80%) 4–7 (36%) 101.0 -3.03
27 1984 2652 177.3 — — — — +102 -154 -67 94.0% +3.48 7–2 (78%) 7–1 (88%) 103.4 -1.21 1976 2066 155.0 — — — — -14 — +209 66.2% +1.56 6–3 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 97.3 -2.65
28 1985 2597 177.7 — — — — +45 -40 +98 90.1% +3.06 10–3 (77%) 9–4 (69%) 101.4 -2.02 1977 2046 131.9 — — — — -19 — — 57.1% +0.43 1–0 1–1 — -1.67
29 1986 2635 182.2 — — — — +71 -120 +83 91.0% +3.03 12–2 (86%) 14–2 (88%) 107.4 -2.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 2529 176.8 — — — — +116 -44 +190 85.7% +2.83 3–2 (60%) 7–4 (64%) 99.6 -3.19 1979 2056 109.2 — — — — — — — 80.0% +1.80 1–0 1–0 — -0.01
31 1988 2457 176.8 — — — — +130 +14 +224 85.5% +2.93 10–3 (77%) 3–5 (38%) 94.4 -2.28 1980 2057 100.8 — — — — — — — 66.7% +1.00 1–0 0–1 — +0.05
32 1989 2426 176.3 — — — — +96 -17 +175 86.5% +2.82 7–4 (64%) 9–1 (90%) 98.0 -1.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 2323 174.5 — — — — +100 +63 +416 84.5% +2.88 6–5 (55%) 5–3 (63%) 94.9 -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1991 2322 172.3 — — — — +107 +4 +335 79.3% +2.24 10–4 (71%) 9–5 (64%) 101.2 -1.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1992 2329 175.0 — — — — +96 — +413 77.5% +2.13 6–6 (50%) 10–0 (100%) 98.4 -1.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1993 2266 172.8 — — — — +96 -13 +353 79.2% +2.30 9–3 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 100.1 -1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1994 2074 161.5 — — — — +132 +37 +403 64.9% +1.41 12–8 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 92.1 -1.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
45 2002 2052 102.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
47 2004 1941 100.2 +0.20 -0.26 1.142 52.8% — +91 — 33.3% -0.50 0–2 — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
48 2005 1911 97.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2683 180.1 +0.20 -0.26 1.142 52.8% +80 -38 +50 81.7% +2.48 220–109 (67%) 170–74 (70%) 105.5 -5.56 — 2221 154.7 — — — — -5 -65 +42 70.1% +1.58 74–32 (70%) 12–19 (39%) 104.4 -1.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.