H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC

Martina Navratilova vs Pam Teeguarden H2H: 7-2

Martina Navratilova holds a 7–2 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on carpet, while Martina Navratilova leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Martina Navratilova won the 1985 Roland Garros first round 6-1 6-0.

USA Age 69 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
7 2
9 main draw meetings
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 29, 1985* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Martina Navratilova #1 6-1 6-0 Pam Teeguarden Match data
Apr 19, 1980* Amelia Island WTA 250 R16 Clay Martina Navratilova 6-2 6-1 Pam Teeguarden Match data
Jun 17, 1977* Edinburgh WTA 250 QF Grass Martina Navratilova 6-1 6-3 Pam Teeguarden Match data
Feb 18, 1977* Los Angeles WTA 500 R16 Hard Martina Navratilova 6-4 6-1 Pam Teeguarden Match data
Mar 5, 1976* San Francisco WTA 250 R16 Carpet Martina Navratilova 7-5 6-1 Pam Teeguarden Match data
Jun 12, 1975* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Martina Navratilova 6-2 2-6 6-3 Pam Teeguarden Match data
Sep 27, 1974* Denver WTA 250 R16 Carpet Pam Teeguarden 4-6 6-3 6-4 Martina Navratilova Match data
Mar 28, 1974* New York WTA 250 R32 Carpet Pam Teeguarden 2-6 6-1 6-4 Martina Navratilova Match data
Jan 28, 1974 Washington WTA 250 R32 Carpet Martina Navratilova 6-1 6-4 Pam Teeguarden Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Martina Navratilova #395 #1 290 2,664 1,427 227 86.3% 18 8 8 15 120 168
Pam Teeguarden 1,926 245 296 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Navratilova Pam Teeguarden
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 1–1 50.0% 1,498 0 1
16 1973 20–17 54.1% 1,761 0 2
17 1974 39–20 66.1% 1,975 0 4 1968 12–17 41.4% 1,509 0 0
18 1975 81–21 79.4% 2,218 0 7 1969 5–11 31.2% 1,506 0 0
19 1976 41–16 71.9% 2,153 0 9 1970 19–19 50.0% 1,629 0 1
20 1977 67–15 81.7% 2,243 0 15 1971 17–21 44.7% 1,681 0 1
21 1978 78–9 89.7% 2,420 1 26 1972 31–25 55.4% 1,874 0 1
22 1979 91–12 88.3% 2,428 2 36 1973 21–22 48.8% 1,846 0 1
23 1980 86–12 87.8% 2,344 2 47 1974 22–18 55.0% 1,905 0 3
24 1981 90–15 85.7% 2,407 3 57 1975 21–25 45.7% 1,815 0 3
25 1982 85–3 96.6% 2,521 5 72 1976 7–14 33.3% 1,775 0 3
26 1983 84–1 98.8% 2,622 8 88 1977 14–20 41.2% 1,783 0 3
27 1984 78–2 97.5% #1 2,633 11 101 1978 11–19 36.7% 1,740 0 3
28 1985 84–5 94.4% #1 2,583 13 113 1979 13–19 40.6% 1,748 0 3
29 1986 84–3 96.6% #1 2,626 15 126 1980 17–16 51.5% 1,803 0 3
30 1987 56–8 87.5% #2 2,523 17 130 1981 20–19 51.3% 1,788 0 4
31 1988 70–7 90.9% #2 2,452 17 139 1982 3–10 23.1% 1,684 0 4
32 1989 68–8 89.5% #2 2,393 17 147 1983 4–6 40.0% 1,653 0 4
33 1990 52–7 88.1% #3 2,306 18 153 1984 8–11 42.1% 1,616 0 4
34 1991 53–9 85.5% #4 2,316 18 158 1985 0–4 0.0% 1,588 0 4
35 1992 38–8 82.6% #5 2,326 18 162
36 1993 46–8 85.2% #3 2,264 18 167
37 1994 33–14 70.2% #8 2,073 18 168
45 2002 1–1 50.0% 2,051 18 168
47 2004 1–4 20.0% #388 1,940 18 168
48 2005 0–1 0.0% #395 1,910 18 168