H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Martina Navratilova vs Rosie Casals H2H: 11-6

Martina Navratilova holds an 11–6 lead over Rosie Casals in their WTA head-to-head. Across 17 main-draw meetings, they are tied 4–4 on carpet, while Martina Navratilova leads 3–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Navratilova won the 1981 Surbiton round of 32 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Navratilova
USA Age 69 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
11 – 6
17 main-draw meetings
Rosie Casals
USA Age 77 Right-Handed 159 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martina Navratilova 6-4 6-1 Rosie Casals Match data Jun 11, 1981* R32 Surbiton WTA 250 Grass
Martina Navratilova 6-3 6-3 Rosie Casals Match data Jul 1, 1979* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Martina Navratilova 6-2 6-4 Rosie Casals Match data Apr 13, 1979* R32 Hilton Head WTA 250 Clay
Martina Navratilova 6-2 Rosie Casals Match data Feb 25, 1979* BR Detroit WTA 250 Carpet
Martina Navratilova 6-3 6-1 Rosie Casals Match data Feb 15, 1979* R32 Los Angeles WTA 500 Carpet
Martina Navratilova 6-3 6-2 Rosie Casals Match data Jan 29, 1978* F Los Angeles WTA 500 Hard
Martina Navratilova 8-5 Rosie Casals Match data Mar 24, 1977 BR WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Martina Navratilova 6-3 6-2 Rosie Casals Match data Mar 19, 1977* SF Philadelphia WTA 250 Hard
Martina Navratilova 7-5 6-4 Rosie Casals Match data Feb 5, 1977* SF Seattle WTA 250 Carpet
Rosie Casals 8-6 Martina Navratilova Match data Apr 12, 1976 BR WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Rosie Casals 8-4 Martina Navratilova Match data Feb 29, 1976* BR Sarasota WTA 250 Carpet
Martina Navratilova 1-6 7-5 7-6(1) Rosie Casals Match data Jan 10, 1975* R16 San Francisco WTA 250 Hard
Martina Navratilova 6-7(4) 7-5 6-3 Rosie Casals Match data Sep 21, 1974* QF Orlando WTA 250 Clay
Rosie Casals 6-2 6-2 Martina Navratilova Match data Mar 9, 1974* R16 Dallas WTA 250 Hard
Rosie Casals 6-1 6-4 Martina Navratilova Match data Mar 1, 1974* R16 Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Rosie Casals 7-5 7-5 Martina Navratilova Match data Feb 24, 1974* R16 Detroit WTA 250 Carpet
Rosie Casals 6-2 3-6 6-4 Martina Navratilova Match data Jan 24, 1974* R32 Mission Viejo WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martina Navratilova #395 #1 290 2,680 1,419 228 86.2% 18 3 8 38 100 167
Rosie Casals #207 #6 — 2,212 594 322 64.8% 0 0 0 2 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Navratilova Rosie Casals
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1973 17–17 50.0% — 1,741 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1974 34–20 63.0% — 1,960 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1975 82–22 78.8% #3 2,246 0 5 — — — — — — —
19 1976 41–16 71.9% #4 2,166 0 7 1968 36–14 72.0% — 1,750 0 1
20 1977 67–15 81.7% #3 2,250 0 13 1969 42–19 68.9% — 1,877 0 1
21 1978 78–9 89.7% #1 2,433 1 24 1970 52–21 71.2% — 2,043 0 4
22 1979 91–12 88.3% #1 2,439 2 34 1971 92–31 74.8% — 2,172 0 7
23 1980 86–12 87.8% #3 2,366 2 45 1972 64–26 71.1% — 2,105 0 10
24 1981 90–15 85.7% #3 2,423 3 55 1973 81–28 74.3% — 2,139 0 12
25 1982 85–3 96.6% #1 2,538 5 70 1974 43–16 72.9% — 2,140 0 12
26 1983 84–1 98.8% #1 2,638 8 86 1975 20–14 58.8% — 2,004 0 12
27 1984 78–2 97.5% #1 2,649 11 99 1976 39–17 69.6% #6 2,127 0 12
28 1985 84–5 94.4% #1 2,595 13 111 1977 41–20 67.2% #6 2,054 0 12
29 1986 84–3 96.6% #1 2,633 15 125 1978 24–15 61.5% — 2,011 0 12
30 1987 56–8 87.5% #2 2,527 17 129 1979 19–26 42.2% — 1,826 0 12
31 1988 70–7 90.9% #2 2,455 17 138 1980 14–25 35.9% — 1,677 0 12
32 1989 68–8 89.5% #2 2,425 17 146 1981 12–14 46.2% — 1,685 0 12
33 1990 52–7 88.1% #3 2,322 18 152 1982 4–8 33.3% — 1,666 0 12
34 1991 53–9 85.5% #4 2,321 18 157 1983 9–12 42.9% — 1,660 0 12
35 1992 38–8 82.6% #5 2,328 18 161 1984 1–4 20.0% #172 1,608 0 12
36 1993 46–8 85.2% #3 2,265 18 166 1985 1–4 20.0% — 1,573 0 12
37 1994 33–14 70.2% #8 2,073 18 167 1986 0–2 0.0% #207 1,546 0 12
39 — — — — — — — 1988 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 12
40 — — — — — — — 1989 0–2 0.0% — 1,499 0 12
41 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 12
42 — — — — — — — 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,475 0 12
45 2002 1–1 50.0% — 2,051 18 167 — — — — — — —
47 2004 1–4 20.0% #388 1,940 18 167 — — — — — — —
48 2005 0–1 0.0% #395 1,910 18 167 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martina Navratilova Rosie Casals
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1972 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 0 2 2 0.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 1 3 4 25.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 25 7 32 78.1% 25 7 32 78.1% 9 3 12 75.0% 23 5 28 82.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1976 10 4 14 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 2 16 87.5% 16 8 24 66.7% 1968 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 8 26 69.2% 4 2 6 66.7%
20 1977 17 6 23 73.9% 10 1 11 90.9% 9 3 12 75.0% 31 5 36 86.1% 1969 4 4 8 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 22 7 29 75.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1978 20 4 24 83.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 0 13 100.0% 43 4 47 91.5% 1970 8 3 11 72.7% 29 8 37 78.4% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1979 14 3 17 82.4% 4 1 5 80.0% 14 2 16 87.5% 59 6 65 90.8% 1971 14 4 18 77.8% 25 10 35 71.4% 22 8 30 73.3% 31 9 40 77.5%
23 1980 18 5 23 78.3% 9 0 9 100.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 47 3 50 94.0% 1972 16 6 22 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 24 8 32 75.0%
24 1981 14 2 16 87.5% 11 3 14 78.6% 21 4 25 84.0% 44 6 50 88.0% 1973 18 5 23 78.3% 20 5 25 80.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 31 14 45 68.9%
25 1982 12 1 13 92.3% 15 0 15 100.0% 21 1 22 95.5% 37 1 38 97.4% 1974 6 4 10 60.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 23 7 30 76.7%
26 1983 22 0 22 100.0% 12 1 13 92.3% 19 0 19 100.0% 31 0 31 100.0% 1975 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 4 10 60.0%
27 1984 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 27 1 28 96.4% 18 1 19 94.7% 1976 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 12 37 67.6%
28 1985 24 3 27 88.9% 14 1 15 93.3% 29 0 29 100.0% 17 1 18 94.4% 1977 14 5 19 73.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 1 5 80.0% 16 10 26 61.5%
29 1986 17 0 17 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 13 0 13 100.0% 44 1 45 97.8% 1978 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0%
30 1987 15 2 17 88.2% 13 3 16 81.3% 17 2 19 89.5% 11 1 12 91.7% 1979 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 11 13 24 45.8%
31 1988 26 3 29 89.7% 17 2 19 89.5% 12 1 13 92.3% 15 1 16 93.8% 1980 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% 7 12 19 36.8%
32 1989 28 3 31 90.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 17 1 18 94.4% 17 2 19 89.5% 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 1990 12 2 14 85.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 13 0 13 100.0% 13 2 15 86.7% 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 1991 15 2 17 88.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 15 1 16 93.8% 17 3 20 85.0% 1983 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0%
35 1992 14 1 15 93.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 17 4 21 81.0% 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
36 1993 15 2 17 88.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 12 2 14 85.7% 17 3 20 85.0% 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 1994 8 2 10 80.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
45 2002 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
47 2004 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
48 2005 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 344 57 401 85.8% 226 58 284 79.6% 315 42 357 88.2% 534 71 605 88.3% — 121 75 196 61.7% 132 65 197 67.0% 144 69 213 67.6% 197 113 310 63.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martina Navratilova Rosie Casals
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1972 1483 98.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1742 151.2 — — — — -211 +47 -161 52.0% +0.01 4–5 (44%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -2.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 1961 159.8 — — — — -284 +114 -237 60.3% +0.74 12–11 (52%) 11–4 (73%) 109.9 -9.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 2247 173.0 — — — — +6 -18 -381 75.8% +1.74 14–7 (67%) 11–2 (85%) 111.4 -10.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1976 2166 161.0 — — — — +4 -34 -73 70.4% +1.38 11–6 (65%) 4–1 (80%) 102.0 -6.41 1968 1751 130.0 — — — — +41 -201 -25 68.8% +1.61 7–9 (44%) — — +0.46
20 1977 2251 173.4 — — — — +102 -69 -110 79.0% +2.21 7–7 (50%) 10–5 (67%) 100.7 -8.80 1969 1878 140.7 — — — — -130 -92 +93 64.3% +1.09 12–6 (67%) — — -4.14
21 1978 2434 178.4 — — — — +35 -307 -96 84.1% +2.77 15–2 (88%) 5–10 (33%) 104.2 -6.56 1970 2043 161.0 — — — — -151 +10 +19 68.1% +1.60 11–5 (69%) 1–3 (25%) 104.5 -10.75
22 1979 2440 178.7 — — — — +37 -222 -63 84.3% +2.59 11–3 (79%) 7–2 (78%) 102.8 -4.63 1971 2173 168.5 — — — — +114 -75 -19 71.2% +1.62 18–13 (58%) 6–9 (40%) 96.2 -13.17
23 1980 2367 177.3 — — — — +175 -69 -15 82.0% +2.50 17–6 (74%) 13–3 (81%) 101.9 -4.48 1972 2106 158.7 — — — — +68 -51 +59 66.5% +1.41 15–7 (68%) 9–6 (60%) 102.7 -7.80
24 1981 2423 179.0 — — — — +104 -134 -12 80.4% +2.47 16–11 (59%) 7–9 (44%) 93.9 -8.43 1973 2139 165.9 — — — — +112 -17 +17 71.1% +1.70 15–13 (54%) 8–12 (40%) 96.6 -11.01
25 1982 2539 179.0 — — — — +107 -124 -87 90.0% +3.08 13–3 (81%) 12–4 (75%) 104.0 -2.79 1974 2140 162.3 — — — — +99 +10 +10 69.8% +1.25 6–8 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 96.0 -8.65
26 1983 2638 183.0 — — — — +115 -236 -76 94.9% +3.91 7–1 (88%) 5–0 (100%) 105.4 -2.30 1975 2004 147.2 — — — — +23 +89 +133 59.8% +0.83 5–9 (36%) 3–4 (43%) 89.5 -3.22
27 1984 2649 177.2 — — — — +103 -152 -65 94.0% +3.48 7–2 (78%) 7–1 (88%) 103.4 -1.21 1976 2127 162.3 — — — — +41 -44 +54 65.5% +1.01 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 102.3 -7.96
28 1985 2595 177.6 — — — — +45 -39 +99 90.1% +3.06 10–3 (77%) 9–4 (69%) 101.4 -1.95 1977 2055 157.2 — — — — +115 -41 +133 64.5% +0.90 8–6 (57%) 6–5 (55%) 100.5 -6.67
29 1986 2634 182.2 — — — — +69 -119 +83 91.0% +3.03 12–2 (86%) 14–2 (88%) 107.4 -2.24 1978 2011 156.1 — — — — +88 -37 +114 57.0% +0.57 10–7 (59%) 1–5 (17%) 95.9 -4.25
30 1987 2527 176.8 — — — — +116 -43 +190 85.7% +2.83 3–2 (60%) 7–4 (64%) 99.6 -3.06 1979 1826 144.2 — — — — +54 +112 +237 46.6% -0.42 7–10 (41%) 6–2 (75%) 94.5 -3.11
31 1988 2456 176.7 — — — — +130 +15 +223 85.5% +2.93 10–3 (77%) 3–5 (38%) 94.4 -2.10 1980 1678 130.2 — — — — +17 — +237 40.4% -0.67 3–8 (27%) 3–8 (27%) 89.2 -1.94
32 1989 2425 176.2 — — — — +96 -16 +175 86.5% +2.82 7–4 (64%) 9–1 (90%) 98.0 -2.04 1981 1685 134.1 — — — — +86 +184 +145 46.0% +0.16 5–6 (45%) 0–4 (0%) 92.6 +0.30
33 1990 2323 174.5 — — — — +99 +62 +414 84.5% +2.88 6–5 (55%) 5–3 (63%) 94.9 -0.34 1982 1666 113.8 — — — — +42 — +126 39.3% -0.75 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — -0.59
34 1991 2322 172.3 — — — — +106 +3 +333 79.3% +2.24 10–4 (71%) 9–5 (64%) 101.2 -1.85 1983 1661 117.2 — — — — -26 — +150 44.9% -0.27 3–4 (43%) 1–0 — -0.27
35 1992 2328 175.0 — — — — +97 — +412 77.5% +2.13 6–6 (50%) 10–0 (100%) 98.4 -1.40 1984 1608 94.3 — — — — — — — 18.2% -2.82 1–0 — — +0.56
36 1993 2265 172.8 — — — — +97 -12 +351 79.2% +2.30 9–3 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 100.2 -1.33 1985 1573 92.4 — — — — +8 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — +0.27
37 1994 2074 161.5 — — — — +133 +37 +402 64.9% +1.41 12–8 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 92.1 -1.09 1986 1547 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1522 93.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — 0.00
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1499 89.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1491 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.03
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1476 94.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17
45 2002 2052 102.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
47 2004 1941 100.2 +0.20 -0.26 1.142 52.8% — +91 — 33.3% -0.50 0–2 — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
48 2005 1911 97.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2680 180.0 +0.20 -0.26 1.142 52.8% +78 -38 +49 81.7% +2.48 220–109 (67%) 170–74 (70%) 105.4 -5.25 — 2212 159.2 — — — — +64 -31 +61 62.3% +0.97 134–119 (53%) 55–68 (45%) 91.2 -9.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.