Home
/
H2H
/
Martina Navratilova vs Sylvia Hanika
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Martina Navratilova vs Sylvia Hanika H2H: 14-2
Martina Navratilova holds a 14–2 lead over Sylvia Hanika in their WTA head-to-head. Across 16 main-draw meetings, Martina Navratilova leads 7–1 on carpet and 5–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Navratilova won the 1988 Canadian Open round of 16 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups?
Advanced rivalry search
lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 69
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
14
–
2
16 main-draw meetings
GER
Age 66
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
Player Score Player Match Data Date Round Tournament Category Surface
Martina Navratilova
#2
6-1 6-1
Sylvia Hanika
#16
Match data
Aug 19, 1988*
R16
Canadian Open
Category 5
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Hard
Martina Navratilova
#2
6-4 6-0
Sylvia Hanika
#14
Match data
Jan 20, 1988*
R16
Australian Open
Grand Slam
Hard
Martina Navratilova
#1
6-0 6-2
Sylvia Hanika
#19
Match data
Jun 2, 1987*
R16
Roland Garros
Grand Slam
Clay
Martina Navratilova
6-0 6-3
Sylvia Hanika
Match data
Sep 9, 1983*
QF
US Open
Grand Slam
Hard
Martina Navratilova
6-1 6-1
Sylvia Hanika
Match data
Mar 23, 1983
SF
WTA Finals
WTA Finals
Carpet
Martina Navratilova
6-3 7-6
Sylvia Hanika
Match data
Jan 16, 1983*
F
Houston
WTA 250
Carpet
Martina Navratilova
6-1 6-1
Sylvia Hanika
Match data
Jan 3, 1983
F
Washington Open
WTA 250
Carpet
Sylvia Hanika
1-6 6-3 6-4
Martina Navratilova
Match data
Mar 24, 1982
F
WTA Finals
WTA Finals
Carpet
Martina Navratilova
6-2 6-3
Sylvia Hanika
Match data
Jan 30, 1982*
SF
Chicago
WTA 250
Carpet
Martina Navratilova
7-5 6-2
Sylvia Hanika
Match data
Oct 31, 1981*
SF
Porsche Tennis Grand Prix
WTA 250
Carpet
Martina Navratilova
6-3 6-3
Sylvia Hanika
Match data
Oct 10, 1981*
SF
Tampa
WTA 250
Hard
Martina Navratilova
7-5 6-4
Sylvia Hanika
Match data
Aug 22, 1981*
QF
Canadian Open
WTA 500
Hard
Sylvia Hanika
6-2 6-4
Martina Navratilova
Match data
Jun 4, 1981*
QF
Roland Garros
Grand Slam
Clay
Martina Navratilova
4-6 6-1 6-1
Sylvia Hanika
Match data
Apr 25, 1981*
QF
Amelia Island
WTA 250
Clay
Martina Navratilova
6-2 6-4
Sylvia Hanika
Match data
Jan 25, 1981*
F
Cincinnati Open
WTA 250
Carpet
Martina Navratilova
5-7 7-5 6-2
Sylvia Hanika
Match data
Nov 8, 1979*
R32
Porsche Tennis Grand Prix
WTA 250
Carpet
*
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category.
Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories.
Mapping details.
Career Comparison
Player
Current
Peak
Pts
Elo
W
L
Win %
GS
1000* including documented historical predecessor categories
Finals
500* including documented historical predecessor categories
250* including documented historical predecessor categories
Titles
Martina Navratilova
#395
#1
290
2,680
1,419
228
86.2%
18
3
8
38
100
167
Sylvia Hanika
#223
#5
48
2,135
415
239
63.5%
0
0
1
0
8
9
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
Yr W-L Win % Rank Elo GS Titles
Yr W-L Win % Rank Elo GS Titles
15
1972
0–1
0.0%
—
1,483
0
0
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
16
1973
17–17
50.0%
—
1,741
0
0
1976
2–1
66.7%
—
1,533
0
0
17
1974
34–20
63.0%
—
1,960
0
1
1977
5–3
62.5%
—
1,583
0
0
18
1975
82–22
78.8%
#3
2,246
0
5
1978
27–14
65.9%
—
1,818
0
1
19
1976
41–16
71.9%
#4
2,166
0
7
1979
26–16
61.9%
—
1,949
0
3
20
1977
67–15
81.7%
#3
2,250
0
13
1980
40–22
64.5%
—
2,000
0
4
21
1978
78–9
89.7%
#1
2,433
1
24
1981
61–23
72.6%
#6
2,082
0
6
22
1979
91–12
88.3%
#1
2,439
2
34
1982
41–23
64.1%
#10
1,944
0
7
23
1980
86–12
87.8%
#3
2,366
2
45
1983
47–22
68.1%
#5
1,969
0
7
24
1981
90–15
85.7%
#3
2,423
3
55
1984
29–20
59.2%
#17
1,879
0
8
25
1982
85–3
96.6%
#1
2,538
5
70
1985
22–16
57.9%
#19
1,868
0
8
26
1983
84–1
98.8%
#1
2,638
8
86
1986
14–14
50.0%
#50
1,803
0
9
27
1984
78–2
97.5%
#1
2,649
11
99
1987
32–19
62.7%
#14
1,920
0
9
28
1985
84–5
94.4%
#1
2,595
13
111
1988
44–22
66.7%
#17
1,919
0
9
29
1986
84–3
96.6%
#1
2,633
15
125
1989
18–14
56.2%
#41
1,806
0
9
30
1987
56–8
87.5%
#2
2,527
17
129
1990
7–10
41.2%
#123
1,702
0
9
31
1988
70–7
90.9%
#2
2,455
17
138
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
32
1989
68–8
89.5%
#2
2,425
17
146
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
33
1990
52–7
88.1%
#3
2,322
18
152
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
34
1991
53–9
85.5%
#4
2,321
18
157
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
35
1992
38–8
82.6%
#5
2,328
18
161
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
36
1993
46–8
85.2%
#3
2,265
18
166
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
37
1994
33–14
70.2%
#8
2,073
18
167
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
45
2002
1–1
50.0%
—
2,051
18
167
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
47
2004
1–4
20.0%
#388
1,940
18
167
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
48
2005
0–1
0.0%
#395
1,910
18
167
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year.
Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
Yr
Yr
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
15
1972
—
—
—
—
0
1
1
0.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
16
1973
0
2
2
0.0%
15
11
26
57.7%
2
2
4
50.0%
0
2
2
0.0%
1976
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2
1
3
66.7%
17
1974
1
3
4
25.0%
16
4
20
80.0%
10
6
16
62.5%
7
7
14
50.0%
1977
—
—
—
—
2
2
4
50.0%
—
—
—
—
3
1
4
75.0%
18
1975
25
7
32
78.1%
25
7
32
78.1%
9
3
12
75.0%
23
5
28
82.1%
1978
0
1
1
0.0%
5
4
9
55.6%
10
5
15
66.7%
8
2
10
80.0%
19
1976
10
4
14
71.4%
1
2
3
33.3%
14
2
16
87.5%
16
8
24
66.7%
1979
5
5
10
50.0%
11
5
16
68.8%
3
2
5
60.0%
7
4
11
63.6%
20
1977
17
6
23
73.9%
10
1
11
90.9%
9
3
12
75.0%
31
5
36
86.1%
1980
8
3
11
72.7%
13
4
17
76.5%
5
5
10
50.0%
14
10
24
58.3%
21
1978
20
4
24
83.3%
2
1
3
66.7%
13
0
13
100.0%
43
4
47
91.5%
1981
15
6
21
71.4%
19
5
24
79.2%
0
1
1
0.0%
26
10
36
72.2%
22
1979
14
3
17
82.4%
4
1
5
80.0%
14
2
16
87.5%
59
6
65
90.8%
1982
4
4
8
50.0%
10
6
16
62.5%
2
3
5
40.0%
25
10
35
71.4%
23
1980
18
5
23
78.3%
9
0
9
100.0%
12
4
16
75.0%
47
3
50
94.0%
1983
6
4
10
60.0%
8
4
12
66.7%
5
2
7
71.4%
28
12
40
70.0%
24
1981
14
2
16
87.5%
11
3
14
78.6%
21
4
25
84.0%
44
6
50
88.0%
1984
10
6
16
62.5%
11
7
18
61.1%
1
3
4
25.0%
7
4
11
63.6%
25
1982
12
1
13
92.3%
15
0
15
100.0%
21
1
22
95.5%
37
1
38
97.4%
1985
11
6
17
64.7%
7
4
11
63.6%
1
1
2
50.0%
3
5
8
37.5%
26
1983
22
0
22
100.0%
12
1
13
92.3%
19
0
19
100.0%
31
0
31
100.0%
1986
1
2
3
33.3%
8
4
12
66.7%
1
2
3
33.3%
4
6
10
40.0%
27
1984
17
0
17
100.0%
16
0
16
100.0%
27
1
28
96.4%
18
1
19
94.7%
1987
11
4
15
73.3%
4
3
7
57.1%
6
4
10
60.0%
11
8
19
57.9%
28
1985
24
3
27
88.9%
14
1
15
93.3%
29
0
29
100.0%
17
1
18
94.4%
1988
16
8
24
66.7%
20
8
28
71.4%
4
3
7
57.1%
4
3
7
57.1%
29
1986
17
0
17
100.0%
10
2
12
83.3%
13
0
13
100.0%
44
1
45
97.8%
1989
8
6
14
57.1%
8
4
12
66.7%
0
1
1
0.0%
2
3
5
40.0%
30
1987
15
2
17
88.2%
13
3
16
81.3%
17
2
19
89.5%
11
1
12
91.7%
1990
4
5
9
44.4%
3
4
7
42.9%
—
—
—
—
0
1
1
0.0%
31
1988
26
3
29
89.7%
17
2
19
89.5%
12
1
13
92.3%
15
1
16
93.8%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
32
1989
28
3
31
90.3%
6
2
8
75.0%
17
1
18
94.4%
17
2
19
89.5%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
33
1990
12
2
14
85.7%
14
3
17
82.4%
13
0
13
100.0%
13
2
15
86.7%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
34
1991
15
2
17
88.2%
6
3
9
66.7%
15
1
16
93.8%
17
3
20
85.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
35
1992
14
1
15
93.3%
1
1
2
50.0%
6
2
8
75.0%
17
4
21
81.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
36
1993
15
2
17
88.2%
2
1
3
66.7%
12
2
14
85.7%
17
3
20
85.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
37
1994
8
2
10
80.0%
7
5
12
58.3%
8
2
10
80.0%
10
5
15
66.7%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
45
2002
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1
1
2
50.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
47
2004
—
—
—
—
0
3
3
0.0%
1
1
2
50.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
48
2005
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0
1
1
0.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Career
—
344
57
401
85.8%
226
58
284
79.6%
315
42
357
88.2%
534
71
605
88.3%
—
99
60
159
62.3%
129
64
193
66.8%
38
32
70
54.3%
144
80
224
64.3%
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.