H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Martina Sucha vs Iva Majoli H2H: 0-1
Iva Majoli holds a 1–0 lead over Martina Sucha in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Iva Majoli leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Iva Majoli won the 2001 Quebec City semifinal 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2001* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Iva Majoli | 6-4 7-5 | Martina Sucha | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Sucha | #948 | #37 | 859 | 1,730 | 96 | 125 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Iva Majoli | #777 | #4 | 3,406 | 2,157 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martina Sucha | Iva Majoli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #50 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 2,040 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 2000 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #113 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,947 | 1 | 7 |
| 20 | 2001 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #65 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,828 | 1 | 7 |
| 21 | 2002 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #164 | 1,694 | 1 | 7 |
| 22 | 2003 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #89 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,703 | 1 | 7 |
| 23 | 2004 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,617 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,697 | 1 | 7 |
| 24 | 2005 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #93 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #32 | 1,668 | 1 | 8 |
| 25 | 2006 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #83 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #131 | 1,589 | 1 | 8 |
| 26 | 2007 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,551 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #321 | 1,564 | 1 | 8 |