H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Martina Sucha vs Tatiana Panova H2H: 1-2
Tatiana Panova holds a 2–1 lead over Martina Sucha in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tatiana Panova leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Sucha won the 2006 Memphis third round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
154 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2006* | Memphis | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Martina Sucha | 6-1 6-0 | Tatiana Panova | Match data |
| Jan 7, 2005* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Tatiana Panova | 7-6(2) 4-6 6-3 | Martina Sucha | Match data |
| Nov 9, 2000* | Kuala Lumpur | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Tatiana Panova | 6-3 6-3 | Martina Sucha | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Sucha | #948 | #37 | 859 | 1,730 | 96 | 125 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Tatiana Panova | #1,113 | #20 | 1,270 | 1,782 | 130 | 196 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martina Sucha | Tatiana Panova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #179 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #113 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #65 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #78 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #89 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #40 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,617 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #34 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #93 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #40 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #83 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #23 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,551 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #114 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #91 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |