H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mary Ann Eisel vs Ann Jones H2H: 0-4
Ann Jones holds a 4–0 lead over Mary Ann Eisel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ann Jones leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ann Jones won the 1971 Las Vegas quarterfinal 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 1971* | Las Vegas | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Ann Jones | 6-0 6-2 | Mary Ann Eisel | Match data |
| Apr 4, 1971* | San Juan | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Ann Jones | 6-3 6-4 | Mary Ann Eisel | Match data |
| Nov 20, 1970* | Wembley | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Ann Jones | 6-2 6-2 | Mary Ann Eisel | Match data |
| Feb 17, 1970* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Ann Jones | 6-2 6-4 | Mary Ann Eisel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Ann Eisel | — | — | — | 1,945 | 172 | 95 | 64.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Ann Jones | — | — | — | 2,178 | 254 | 64 | 79.9% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 28 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Ann Eisel | Ann Jones | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1974 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 12 | 1968 | 41–10 | 80.4% | — | 1,864 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 74–15 | 83.1% | — | 2,044 | 1 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 75–16 | 82.4% | — | 2,104 | 1 | 18 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 2,166 | 1 | 20 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 6–0 | 100.0% | — | 2,173 | 1 | 22 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 8–1 | 88.9% | — | 2,157 | 1 | 25 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 2,106 | 1 | 28 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 7–3 | 70.0% | — | 2,026 | 1 | 28 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 2,001 | 1 | 28 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,970 | 1 | 28 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,940 | 1 | 28 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,910 | 1 | 28 |
| 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,881 | 1 | 28 |