H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mary Ann Eisel vs Annette Van Zyl H2H: 0-3
Annette Van Zyl holds a 3–0 lead over Mary Ann Eisel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Annette Van Zyl leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Annette Van Zyl won the 1969 Port Talbot quarterfinal 4-6 12-10 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 1969* | Port Talbot | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Annette Van Zyl | 4-6 12-10 6-0 | Mary Ann Eisel | Match data |
| Oct 19, 1969* | Perth Scotland | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Annette Van Zyl | 3-6 6-1 6-1 | Mary Ann Eisel | Match data |
| Jun 20, 1968* | Queen's Club | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Annette Van Zyl | 6-3 6-4 | Mary Ann Eisel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Ann Eisel | — | — | — | 1,945 | 172 | 95 | 64.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Annette Van Zyl | — | — | — | 1,900 | 107 | 46 | 69.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Ann Eisel | Annette Van Zyl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 11 | 1968 | 49–12 | 80.3% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 11 | 1969 | 16–9 | 64.0% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 11 | 1970 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1974 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 12 | 1973 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 11–1 | 91.7% | — | 1,888 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,834 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 9 |