H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mary Ann Eisel vs Betty Ann Grubb H2H: 2-1
Mary Ann Eisel holds a 2–1 lead over Betty Ann Grubb in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mary Ann Eisel leads 1–0 on carpet, while Betty Ann Grubb leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mary Ann Eisel won the 1970 Boston quarterfinal 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 1970* | Boston | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Mary Ann Eisel | 6-1 6-3 | Betty Ann Grubb | Match data |
| Feb 25, 1970* | Agawam | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Mary Ann Eisel | 6-4 6-1 | Betty Ann Grubb | Match data |
| Aug 2, 1969* | Orange | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Betty Ann Grubb | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Mary Ann Eisel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Ann Eisel | — | — | — | 1,945 | 172 | 95 | 64.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Betty Ann Grubb | — | — | — | 1,822 | 124 | 112 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Ann Eisel | Betty Ann Grubb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 21–8 | 72.4% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 1969 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 7 | 1969 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 5 |
| 1970 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 11 | 1970 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 5 |
| 1971 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 11 | 1971 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 5 |
| 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 11 | 1972 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 6 |
| 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 11 | 1973 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 7 |
| 1974 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 12 | 1974 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 7 |
| 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 12 | 1975 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 7 |
| 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 12 | 1976 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 25–26 | 49.0% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 7 |