H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Mary Ann Eisel vs Chris Evert H2H: 1-4

Chris Evert holds a 4–1 lead over Mary Ann Eisel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Chris Evert leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1974 New York fourth round 2-6 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Ann Eisel
Age 79 Right-Handed
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 29, 1974* New York WTA 250 R16 Carpet Chris Evert 2-6 6-1 6-2 Mary Ann Eisel Match data
Jul 2, 1972* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Chris Evert 8-6 8-6 Mary Ann Eisel Match data
Sep 7, 1971* US Open Grand Slam R32 Grass Chris Evert 4-6 7-6 6-1 Mary Ann Eisel Match data
Jun 3, 1971* Tulsa WTA 250 F Clay Chris Evert 6-0 6-3 Mary Ann Eisel Match data
Jan 25, 1969* Fort Lauderdale WTA 250 SF Clay Mary Ann Eisel 7-5 3-6 6-1 Chris Evert Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Ann Eisel — — — 1,945 172 95 64.4% 0 0 0 0 12 12
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,574 1,222 157 88.6% 18 4 1 8 115 146

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Ann Eisel Chris Evert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1
15 — — — — — — — 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,750 0 4
16 — — — — — — — 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,002 0 11
17 — — — — — — — 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,235 0 15
18 — — — — — — — 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,359 0 27
19 — — — — — — — 1974 93–7 93.0% — 2,438 2 39
20 — — — — — — — 1975 84–7 92.3% — 2,508 4 51
21 1968 45–22 67.2% — 1,774 0 3 1976 63–5 92.6% — 2,525 6 60
22 1969 54–23 70.1% — 1,800 0 7 1977 63–4 94.0% — 2,553 7 71
23 1970 33–20 62.3% — 1,769 0 11 1978 49–4 92.5% — 2,568 8 78
24 1971 26–19 57.8% — 1,862 0 11 1979 81–14 85.3% — 2,394 9 85
25 1972 3–6 33.3% — 1,825 0 11 1980 66–9 88.0% — 2,417 11 93
26 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,837 0 11 1981 64–9 87.7% — 2,423 12 101
27 1974 7–2 77.8% — 1,860 0 12 1982 66–6 91.7% — 2,459 14 110
28 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,852 0 12 1983 59–11 84.3% — 2,353 15 116
29 1976 1–1 50.0% — 1,840 0 12 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,388 16 122
30 — — — — — — — 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,417 17 131
31 — — — — — — — 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,415 18 137
32 — — — — — — — 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,331 18 142
33 — — — — — — — 1988 61–12 83.6% #3 2,285 18 146
34 — — — — — — — 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,141 18 146