H2H data updated: 2026-10-22 00:00 UTC

Mary Ann Eisel vs Chris Evert H2H: 1-4

Chris Evert holds a 4–1 lead over Mary Ann Eisel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Chris Evert leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1974 New York round of 16 2-6 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Ann Eisel
USA Age 79 Right-Handed
H2H
1 – 4
5 main-draw meetings
Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chris Evert 2-6 6-1 6-2 Mary Ann Eisel Match data Mar 29, 1974* R16 New York WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 8-6 8-6 Mary Ann Eisel Match data Jul 2, 1972* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Chris Evert 4-6 7-6 6-1 Mary Ann Eisel Match data Sep 7, 1971* R32 US Open Grand Slam Grass
Chris Evert 6-0 6-3 Mary Ann Eisel Match data Jun 3, 1971* F Tulsa WTA 250 Clay
Mary Ann Eisel 7-5 3-6 6-1 Chris Evert Match data Jan 25, 1969* SF Fort Lauderdale WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mary Ann Eisel — — — 1,956 172 95 64.4% 0 0 0 0 12 12
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,617 1,246 158 88.7% 18 0 5 19 112 154

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Ann Eisel Chris Evert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,744 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,003 0 4
17 — — — — — — — 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,249 0 8
18 — — — — — — — 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,374 0 20
19 — — — — — — — 1974 100–7 93.5% — 2,459 2 36
20 — — — — — — — 1975 88–7 92.6% #1 2,560 4 52
21 1968 45–22 67.2% — 1,772 0 3 1976 71–5 93.4% #1 2,566 6 64
22 1969 54–23 70.1% — 1,820 0 7 1977 63–4 94.0% #1 2,580 7 75
23 1970 33–20 62.3% — 1,784 0 11 1978 49–4 92.5% #2 2,614 8 82
24 1971 26–19 57.8% — 1,870 0 11 1979 82–14 85.4% #2 2,444 9 90
25 1972 3–6 33.3% — 1,832 0 11 1980 66–9 88.0% #1 2,471 11 98
26 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,844 0 11 1981 65–9 87.8% #1 2,480 12 107
27 1974 7–2 77.8% — 1,865 0 12 1982 67–6 91.8% #2 2,497 14 117
28 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,856 0 12 1983 59–11 84.3% #2 2,403 15 123
29 1976 1–1 50.0% — 1,844 0 12 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,412 16 129
30 — — — — — — — 1985 78–8 90.7% #2 2,434 17 139
31 — — — — — — — 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,425 18 145
32 — — — — — — — 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,336 18 150
33 — — — — — — — 1988 62–13 82.7% #3 2,286 18 154
34 — — — — — — — 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,167 18 154

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mary Ann Eisel Chris Evert
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 — — — — 14 2 16 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 — — — — 20 1 21 95.2% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 3 1 4 75.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 18 3 21 85.7% 5 2 7 71.4%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 17 1 18 94.4% 46 4 50 92.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 8 0 8 100.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 19 1 20 95.0% 42 0 42 100.0% 24 2 26 92.3% 14 4 18 77.8%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 27 2 29 93.1% 37 0 37 100.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 3 21 85.7%
21 1968 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 27 9 36 75.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 1976 15 1 16 93.8% 11 0 11 100.0% 13 0 13 100.0% 31 4 35 88.6%
22 1969 1 3 4 25.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 26 7 33 78.8% 10 5 15 66.7% 1977 12 0 12 100.0% 12 0 12 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 31 2 33 93.9%
23 1970 5 1 6 83.3% 10 8 18 55.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1978 17 0 17 100.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5%
24 1971 4 3 7 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 1979 19 4 23 82.6% 20 1 21 95.2% 12 1 13 92.3% 31 8 39 79.5%
25 1972 — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1980 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 23 8 31 74.2%
26 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1981 15 2 17 88.2% 25 1 26 96.2% 16 1 17 94.1% 9 5 14 64.3%
27 1974 — — — — 6 0 6 100.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1982 24 1 25 96.0% 23 2 25 92.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 10 2 12 83.3%
28 1975 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 19 3 22 86.4% 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 16 7 23 69.6%
29 1976 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 21 1 22 95.5% 24 3 27 88.9% 16 2 18 88.9% 7 2 9 77.8%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 21 2 23 91.3% 22 1 23 95.7% 16 2 18 88.9% 19 3 22 86.4%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 21 2 23 91.3% 20 1 21 95.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 10 2 12 83.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 18 5 23 78.3% 23 2 25 92.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 18 3 21 85.7%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 33 6 39 84.6% 13 2 15 86.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 11 4 15 73.3%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 14 5 19 73.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 16 12 28 57.1% 46 24 70 65.7% 75 29 104 72.1% 34 28 62 54.8% — 332 37 369 90.0% 423 26 449 94.2% 209 33 242 86.4% 279 62 341 81.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mary Ann Eisel Chris Evert
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1560 117.6 — — — — — +24 — 63.6% +1.18 0–1 — — +0.13
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1745 152.4 — — — — — +83 — 77.1% +2.63 0–1 2–0 — -0.34
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 2004 157.6 — — — — — +17 -224 85.9% +3.36 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 107.3 +1.65
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 2250 173.8 — — — — -437 +32 -205 82.6% +2.69 5–2 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 107.2 -8.05
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 2374 178.1 — — — — -194 +102 -190 87.7% +3.21 8–3 (73%) 8–2 (80%) 110.6 -5.25
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 2460 181.1 — — — — -66 +155 -101 88.4% +3.39 12–4 (75%) 3–6 (33%) 101.3 -5.58
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 2561 182.1 — — — — -54 +157 -241 88.9% +3.34 9–3 (75%) 7–2 (78%) 105.5 -5.39
21 1968 1773 127.8 — — — — -14 -244 +92 60.9% +0.93 17–7 (71%) — — -1.99 1976 2567 181.1 — — — — +42 +122 -103 87.8% +3.12 10–2 (83%) 8–4 (67%) 102.4 -3.25
22 1969 1820 139.1 — — — — -21 -61 +133 65.7% +1.05 15–9 (63%) — — -5.01 1977 2581 181.8 — — — — +147 +142 -83 90.7% +3.33 5–1 (83%) 4–1 (80%) 104.4 -2.71
23 1970 1785 131.6 — — — — +107 -54 +100 60.3% +0.69 10–8 (56%) 1–0 — -1.37 1978 2615 179.6 — — — — +109 +62 -113 87.1% +3.14 9–3 (75%) 1–1 — -2.67
24 1971 1871 144.6 — — — — +33 -38 +3 55.4% +0.21 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 100.6 -4.54 1979 2445 178.7 — — — — +15 +298 +73 81.0% +2.77 13–2 (87%) 3–4 (43%) 99.7 -3.77
25 1972 1833 126.1 — — — — +22 — -11 45.8% -0.04 1–5 (17%) 1–1 — -1.44 1980 2472 177.7 — — — — +82 +339 +114 82.6% +2.79 13–0 (100%) 2–4 (33%) 105.0 -4.52
26 1973 1844 115.8 — — — — — +7 — 66.7% +1.33 — — — -0.53 1981 2480 182.5 — — — — +11 +299 +140 86.3% +3.09 9–2 (82%) 7–1 (88%) 105.5 -4.00
27 1974 1865 125.8 — — — — -56 +62 — 76.2% +1.67 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.13 1982 2497 179.5 — — — — +60 +259 +77 88.4% +3.34 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 97.9 -4.08
28 1975 1857 107.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 — — -0.08 1983 2404 176.6 — — — — +46 +319 +184 79.9% +2.28 10–3 (77%) 6–3 (67%) 97.9 -4.42
29 1976 1845 104.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 — — +0.12 1984 2412 175.6 — — — — +69 +210 +144 82.8% +2.90 11–2 (85%) 2–4 (33%) 99.2 -4.58
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 2434 176.7 — — — — +28 +244 +130 86.0% +2.88 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 98.7 -3.85
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 2426 177.4 — — — — +7 +245 +117 83.6% +2.78 10–0 (100%) 4–3 (57%) 104.6 -3.46
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 2336 176.4 — — — — +22 +298 +206 81.9% +2.62 7–6 (54%) 4–1 (80%) 96.1 -4.70
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 2287 173.9 — — — — +33 +322 +236 79.0% +2.37 11–2 (85%) 5–4 (56%) 101.1 -3.78
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2168 158.7 — — — — +39 +352 +268 73.8% +1.59 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 93.3 -2.27
Career — 1956 139.2 — — — — +14 -57 +93 61.0% +0.78 53–39 (58%) 8–9 (47%) 103.3 -5.74 — 2617 182.2 — — — — +20 +195 0 84.6% +2.92 166–50 (77%) 85–50 (63%) 106.2 -5.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.