H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mary Ann Eisel vs Corinne Molesworth H2H: 2-2
Mary Ann Eisel and Corinne Molesworth are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mary Ann Eisel leads 1–0 on carpet, while Corinne Molesworth leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Corinne Molesworth won the 1970 Kansas City Heart of America semifinal 2-6 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 1970* | Kansas City Heart of America | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Corinne Molesworth | 2-6 6-4 7-5 | Mary Ann Eisel | Match data |
| Nov 1, 1969* | Port Talbot | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Mary Ann Eisel | 3-6 8-6 7-5 | Corinne Molesworth | Match data |
| Oct 25, 1969* | Stalybridge | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Corinne Molesworth | (w/o) | Mary Ann Eisel | Match data |
| Jun 19, 1969* | Queen's Club | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Mary Ann Eisel | 6-0 2-6 7-5 | Corinne Molesworth | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Ann Eisel | — | — | — | 1,945 | 172 | 95 | 64.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Corinne Molesworth | — | — | — | 1,782 | 219 | 183 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Ann Eisel | Corinne Molesworth | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 27–21 | 56.2% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1968 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 38–31 | 55.1% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1969 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 7 | 1971 | 18–24 | 42.9% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1970 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 11 | 1972 | 27–27 | 50.0% | — | 1,759 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1971 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 11 | 1973 | 12–12 | 50.0% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 11 | 1974 | 15–11 | 57.7% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 11 | 1975 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1974 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 12 | 1976 | 16–9 | 64.0% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 12 | 1977 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 12 | 1978 | 21–9 | 70.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 17–7 | 70.8% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |