H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mary Ann Eisel vs Denise Carter H2H: 3-2
Mary Ann Eisel holds a 3–2 lead over Denise Carter in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Mary Ann Eisel leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mary Ann Eisel won the 1971 San Juan quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 1971* | San Juan | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Mary Ann Eisel | 6-3 6-4 | Denise Carter | Match data |
| May 2, 1970* | Kansas City | WTA 250 | QF | — | Denise Carter | 6-1 2-6 6-3 | Mary Ann Eisel | Match data |
| Jun 14, 1969* | Beckenham | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Denise Carter | 6-4 6-4 | Mary Ann Eisel | Match data |
| Jun 6, 1969* | Manchester | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Mary Ann Eisel | 2-6 6-3 6-3 | Denise Carter | Match data |
| Feb 23, 1969* | Boston | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Mary Ann Eisel | 6-2 2-6 6-3 | Denise Carter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Ann Eisel | — | — | — | 1,945 | 172 | 95 | 64.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Denise Carter | — | — | — | 1,781 | 67 | 58 | 53.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Ann Eisel | Denise Carter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 26–15 | 63.4% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1968 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1969 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 11 | 1974 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1971 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1974 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |