H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mary Ann Eisel vs Esme Emmanuel H2H: 3-1
Mary Ann Eisel holds a 3–1 lead over Esme Emmanuel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Mary Ann Eisel leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mary Ann Eisel won the 1970 Kansas City Heart of America quarterfinal 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 1970* | Kansas City Heart of America | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Mary Ann Eisel | 6-3 6-2 | Esme Emmanuel | Match data |
| Jun 6, 1970* | Chichester | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Esme Emmanuel | 6-2 5-7 6-1 | Mary Ann Eisel | Match data |
| Jun 21, 1969* | Queen's Club | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Mary Ann Eisel | 6-2 6-2 | Esme Emmanuel | Match data |
| Feb 20, 1969* | Agawam | WTA 250 | F | Carpet | Mary Ann Eisel | 7-5 6-2 | Esme Emmanuel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Ann Eisel | — | — | — | 1,945 | 172 | 95 | 64.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Esme Emmanuel | — | — | — | 1,766 | 77 | 85 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Ann Eisel | Esme Emmanuel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1969 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 7 | 1969 | 19–14 | 57.6% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1970 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 11 | 1970 | 30–20 | 60.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1971 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 11 | 1971 | 4–17 | 19.0% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 11 | 1972 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1974 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |