H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Mary Ann Eisel vs Esme Emmanuel H2H: 3-1

Mary Ann Eisel holds a 3–1 lead over Esme Emmanuel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Mary Ann Eisel leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mary Ann Eisel won the 1970 Kansas City Heart of America quarterfinal 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Ann Eisel
USA Age 79 Right-Handed
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Esme Emmanuel
RSA Age 79

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mary Ann Eisel 6-3 6-2 Esme Emmanuel Match data Sep 12, 1970* QF Kansas City Heart of America WTA 250 Clay
Esme Emmanuel 6-2 5-7 6-1 Mary Ann Eisel Match data Jun 6, 1970* QF Chichester WTA 250 Grass
Mary Ann Eisel 6-2 6-2 Esme Emmanuel Match data Jun 21, 1969* QF Queen's Club Championships WTA 250 Grass
Mary Ann Eisel 7-5 6-2 Esme Emmanuel Match data Feb 20, 1969* F Agawam WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mary Ann Eisel — — — 1,956 172 95 64.4% 0 0 0 0 12 12
Esme Emmanuel — — — 1,773 77 85 47.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Ann Eisel Esme Emmanuel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 1968 45–22 67.2% — 1,772 0 3 1968 11–14 44.0% — 1,509 0 1
22 1969 54–23 70.1% — 1,820 0 7 1969 19–14 57.6% — 1,657 0 1
23 1970 33–20 62.3% — 1,784 0 11 1970 30–20 60.0% — 1,745 0 2
24 1971 26–19 57.8% — 1,870 0 11 1971 4–17 19.0% — 1,669 0 2
25 1972 3–6 33.3% — 1,832 0 11 1972 13–20 39.4% — 1,691 0 2
26 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,844 0 11 — — — — — — —
27 1974 7–2 77.8% — 1,865 0 12 — — — — — — —
28 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,856 0 12 — — — — — — —
29 1976 1–1 50.0% — 1,844 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mary Ann Eisel Esme Emmanuel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 1968 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 27 9 36 75.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 1968 0 2 2 0.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1969 1 3 4 25.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 26 7 33 78.8% 10 5 15 66.7% 1969 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 1970 5 1 6 83.3% 10 8 18 55.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1970 8 6 14 57.1% 10 6 16 62.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 1971 4 3 7 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 6 6 0.0%
25 1972 — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1972 0 3 3 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1974 — — — — 6 0 6 100.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1975 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1976 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 16 12 28 57.1% 46 24 70 65.7% 75 29 104 72.1% 34 28 62 54.8% — 13 15 28 46.4% 24 29 53 45.3% 29 25 54 53.7% 10 14 24 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mary Ann Eisel Esme Emmanuel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 1968 1773 127.8 — — — — -14 -244 +92 60.9% +0.93 17–7 (71%) — — -1.99 1968 1510 105.5 — — — — -13 +12 +2 47.3% -0.33 1–6 (14%) — — +0.43
22 1969 1820 139.1 — — — — -21 -61 +133 65.7% +1.05 15–9 (63%) — — -5.01 1969 1658 119.2 — — — — +43 -96 -61 53.9% +0.20 7–3 (70%) — — -0.76
23 1970 1785 131.6 — — — — +107 -54 +100 60.3% +0.69 10–8 (56%) 1–0 — -1.37 1970 1745 133.9 — — — — -17 -69 -74 58.9% +0.80 6–7 (46%) 0–1 — +0.03
24 1971 1871 144.6 — — — — +33 -38 +3 55.4% +0.21 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 100.6 -4.54 1971 1670 123.4 — — — — -35 -59 -11 21.4% -2.00 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — -2.46
25 1972 1833 126.1 — — — — +22 — -11 45.8% -0.04 1–5 (17%) 1–1 — -1.40 1972 1691 124.2 — — — — -123 -130 +35 39.4% -1.01 7–2 (78%) 1–0 — -3.87
26 1973 1844 115.8 — — — — — +7 — 66.7% +1.33 — — — -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1974 1865 125.8 — — — — -56 +61 — 76.2% +1.67 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1975 1857 107.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1976 1845 104.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1956 139.2 — — — — +14 -58 +93 61.0% +0.78 53–39 (58%) 8–9 (47%) 103.3 -5.67 — 1773 126.6 — — — — -15 -59 -24 47.6% -0.21 22–21 (51%) 1–3 (25%) 100.5 -4.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.