H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Mary Ann Eisel vs Ingrid Bentzer H2H: 1-0
Mary Ann Eisel holds a 1–0 lead over Ingrid Bentzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mary Ann Eisel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Ann Eisel won the 1968 Rome third round 6-1 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 82
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 1968* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Mary Ann Eisel | 6-1 8-6 | Ingrid Bentzer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Ann Eisel | — | — | — | 1,945 | 172 | 95 | 64.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Ingrid Bentzer | — | — | — | 1,826 | 72 | 99 | 42.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Ann Eisel | Ingrid Bentzer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 11 | 1968 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 11 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 11 | 1970 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1974 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 12 | 1971 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 12 | 1972 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 12 | 1973 | 16–8 | 66.7% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 7 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 7 |