H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mary Ann Eisel vs Jill Cooper H2H: 4-0
Mary Ann Eisel holds a 4–0 lead over Jill Cooper in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mary Ann Eisel leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mary Ann Eisel won the 1971 Wimbledon second round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 1971* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Mary Ann Eisel | 6-1 6-3 | Jill Cooper | Match data |
| May 20, 1971* | Bournemouth | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Mary Ann Eisel | 4-6 7-5 6-2 | Jill Cooper | Match data |
| Jul 11, 1969* | Newport Wales | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Mary Ann Eisel | 6-3 8-6 | Jill Cooper | Match data |
| Nov 8, 1968* | Torquay | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Mary Ann Eisel | 6-4 6-3 | Jill Cooper | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Ann Eisel | — | — | — | 1,945 | 172 | 95 | 64.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Jill Cooper | — | — | — | 1,829 | 106 | 86 | 55.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Ann Eisel | Jill Cooper | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 15–16 | 48.4% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1968 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 18–16 | 52.9% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1969 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 7 | 1971 | 36–19 | 65.5% | — | 1,747 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1970 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 11 | 1972 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1971 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 11 | 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,801 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1974 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |