H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Mary Ann Eisel vs Joyce Williams H2H: 1-2
Joyce Williams holds a 2–1 lead over Mary Ann Eisel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Joyce Williams leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Joyce Williams won the 1968 Manchester Indoors quarterfinal 3-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 1968* | Manchester Indoors | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Joyce Williams | 3-6 7-5 6-4 | Mary Ann Eisel | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1968* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Joyce Williams | 7-5 2-6 6-4 | Mary Ann Eisel | Match data |
| Jun 19, 1968* | Queen's Club | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Mary Ann Eisel | 4-6 7-5 6-1 | Joyce Williams | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Ann Eisel | — | — | — | 1,945 | 172 | 95 | 64.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Joyce Williams | — | — | — | 1,966 | 188 | 88 | 68.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Ann Eisel | Joyce Williams | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 11 | 1968 | 35–20 | 63.6% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1971 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 11 | 1969 | 36–20 | 64.3% | — | 1,801 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 11 | 1970 | 46–17 | 73.0% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 11 | 1971 | 23–12 | 65.7% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1974 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 12 | 1972 | 30–8 | 78.9% | — | 1,935 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 12 | 1973 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 12 | 1974 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,842 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 5–1 | 83.3% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,835 | 0 | 11 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 11 |