H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Mary Ann Eisel vs Julie Heldman H2H: 1-1
Mary Ann Eisel and Julie Heldman are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Julie Heldman leads 1–0 on carpet, while Mary Ann Eisel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julie Heldman won the 1969 Wembley fourth round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 80
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 1969* | Wembley | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Julie Heldman | 6-3 6-1 | Mary Ann Eisel | Match data |
| May 17, 1969* | Hurlingham | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Mary Ann Eisel | 6-4 10-8 | Julie Heldman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Ann Eisel | — | — | — | 1,945 | 172 | 95 | 64.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Julie Heldman | — | — | — | 2,133 | 381 | 159 | 70.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 21 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Ann Eisel | Julie Heldman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 7 | 1968 | 53–15 | 77.9% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1970 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 11 | 1969 | 74–17 | 81.3% | — | 2,020 | 0 | 14 |
| 24 | 1971 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 11 | 1970 | 29–12 | 70.7% | — | 1,948 | 0 | 15 |
| 25 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 11 | 1971 | 41–23 | 64.1% | — | 2,019 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 11 | 1972 | 32–26 | 55.2% | — | 1,958 | 0 | 16 |
| 27 | 1974 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 12 | 1973 | 68–31 | 68.7% | — | 2,066 | 0 | 19 |
| 28 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 12 | 1974 | 60–21 | 74.1% | — | 2,086 | 0 | 21 |
| 29 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 12 | 1975 | 24–14 | 63.2% | — | 1,989 | 0 | 21 |