H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Mary Ann Eisel vs Julie Heldman H2H: 1-1

Mary Ann Eisel and Julie Heldman are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Julie Heldman leads 1–0 on carpet, while Mary Ann Eisel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julie Heldman won the 1969 Wembley round of 16 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Ann Eisel
USA Age 79 Right-Handed
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Julie Heldman
USA Age 80 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julie Heldman 6-3 6-1 Mary Ann Eisel Match data Nov 22, 1969* R16 Wembley WTA 250 Carpet
Mary Ann Eisel 6-4 10-8 Julie Heldman Match data May 17, 1969* SF Hurlingham WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mary Ann Eisel — — — 1,956 172 95 64.4% 0 0 0 0 12 12
Julie Heldman — — — 2,133 381 159 70.6% 0 0 0 0 21 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Ann Eisel Julie Heldman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 1968 45–22 67.2% — 1,772 0 3 — — — — — — —
22 1969 54–23 70.1% — 1,820 0 7 1968 53–15 77.9% — 1,811 0 6
23 1970 33–20 62.3% — 1,784 0 11 1969 74–17 81.3% — 2,020 0 14
24 1971 26–19 57.8% — 1,870 0 11 1970 29–12 70.7% — 1,959 0 15
25 1972 3–6 33.3% — 1,832 0 11 1971 41–23 64.1% — 2,031 0 16
26 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,844 0 11 1972 32–26 55.2% — 1,962 0 16
27 1974 7–2 77.8% — 1,865 0 12 1973 68–31 68.7% — 2,074 0 19
28 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,856 0 12 1974 60–21 74.1% — 2,089 0 21
29 1976 1–1 50.0% — 1,844 0 12 1975 24–14 63.2% — 1,995 0 21

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mary Ann Eisel Julie Heldman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 1968 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 27 9 36 75.0% 11 7 18 61.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1969 1 3 4 25.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 26 7 33 78.8% 10 5 15 66.7% 1968 8 3 11 72.7% 37 7 44 84.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1970 5 1 6 83.3% 10 8 18 55.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1969 13 3 16 81.3% 32 4 36 88.9% 9 4 13 69.2% 16 6 22 72.7%
24 1971 4 3 7 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 1970 — — — — 19 6 25 76.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1972 — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1971 6 3 9 66.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 11 4 15 73.3% 13 10 23 56.5%
26 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1972 5 3 8 62.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 15 11 26 57.7%
27 1974 — — — — 6 0 6 100.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1973 10 4 14 71.4% 17 7 24 70.8% 24 6 30 80.0% 17 14 31 54.8%
28 1975 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 24 10 34 70.6% 21 5 26 80.8% 15 6 21 71.4%
29 1976 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 4 3 7 57.1% 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 11 5 16 68.8%
Career — 16 12 28 57.1% 46 24 70 65.7% 75 29 104 72.1% 34 28 62 54.8% — 46 19 65 70.8% 155 52 207 74.9% 85 33 118 72.0% 89 54 143 62.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mary Ann Eisel Julie Heldman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 1968 1773 127.8 — — — — -14 -244 +92 60.9% +0.93 17–7 (71%) — — -1.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1969 1820 139.1 — — — — -21 -61 +133 65.7% +1.05 15–9 (63%) — — -5.01 1968 1811 138.4 — — — — -128 +140 -203 73.8% +2.05 10–3 (77%) — — -1.49
23 1970 1785 131.6 — — — — +107 -54 +100 60.3% +0.69 10–8 (56%) 1–0 — -1.37 1969 2021 153.7 — — — — +84 +69 -264 74.9% +2.13 16–5 (76%) — — -8.73
24 1971 1871 144.6 — — — — +33 -38 +3 55.4% +0.21 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 100.6 -4.54 1970 1960 152.1 — — — — — +143 -157 70.9% +1.83 3–5 (38%) — — -3.54
25 1972 1833 126.1 — — — — +22 — -11 45.8% -0.04 1–5 (17%) 1–1 — -1.40 1971 2032 159.2 — — — — +11 +32 -114 62.0% +1.18 10–8 (56%) 1–3 (25%) 97.7 -6.66
26 1973 1844 115.8 — — — — — +7 — 66.7% +1.33 — — — -0.50 1972 1963 153.4 — — — — +119 +20 -75 55.3% +0.34 7–9 (44%) 4–0 (100%) 98.9 -9.20
27 1974 1865 125.8 — — — — -56 +61 — 76.2% +1.67 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.04 1973 2075 159.9 — — — — -31 -45 +40 66.5% +1.41 12–9 (57%) 2–8 (20%) 97.9 -10.33
28 1975 1857 107.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 — — -0.07 1974 2090 159.9 — — — — -2 -3 +79 69.7% +1.48 11–6 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 102.8 -5.94
29 1976 1845 104.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 — — +0.12 1975 1995 149.5 — — — — +96 -22 — 59.0% +0.87 6–3 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 98.1 -3.41
Career — 1956 139.2 — — — — +14 -58 +93 61.0% +0.78 53–39 (58%) 8–9 (47%) 103.3 -5.67 — 2134 158.8 — — — — +33 +56 -56 67.3% +1.47 75–48 (61%) 14–18 (44%) 100.6 -9.28

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.