H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mary Ann Eisel vs Laura Dupont H2H: 1-0
Mary Ann Eisel holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Dupont in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mary Ann Eisel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Ann Eisel won the 1971 Tulsa semifinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 1971* | Tulsa | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Mary Ann Eisel | 6-4 6-4 | Laura Dupont | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Ann Eisel | — | — | — | 1,945 | 172 | 95 | 64.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Laura Dupont | — | — | — | 1,893 | 216 | 244 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Ann Eisel | Laura Dupont | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1968 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1969 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 7 | 1971 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1970 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 11 | 1972 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1971 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 11 | 1973 | 13–23 | 36.1% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 11 | 1974 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 11 | 1975 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1974 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 12 | 1976 | 25–19 | 56.8% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 12 | 1977 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 12 | 1978 | 24–25 | 49.0% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 22–20 | 52.4% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 16–23 | 41.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 6 |