H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Mary Ann Eisel vs Lea Pericoli H2H: 0-1

Lea Pericoli holds a 1–0 lead over Mary Ann Eisel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lea Pericoli leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lea Pericoli won the 1969 Italian Open round of 16 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Ann Eisel
USA Age 79 Right-Handed
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lea Pericoli
ITA Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lea Pericoli 6-2 6-1 Mary Ann Eisel Match data Apr 25, 1969* R16 Italian Open WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mary Ann Eisel — — — 1,956 172 95 64.4% 0 0 0 0 12 12
Lea Pericoli — — — 1,772 58 51 53.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Ann Eisel Lea Pericoli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 1968 45–22 67.2% — 1,772 0 3 — — — — — — —
22 1969 54–23 70.1% — 1,820 0 7 — — — — — — —
23 1970 33–20 62.3% — 1,784 0 11 — — — — — — —
24 1971 26–19 57.8% — 1,870 0 11 — — — — — — —
25 1972 3–6 33.3% — 1,832 0 11 — — — — — — —
26 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,844 0 11 — — — — — — —
27 1974 7–2 77.8% — 1,865 0 12 — — — — — — —
28 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,856 0 12 — — — — — — —
29 1976 1–1 50.0% — 1,844 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — 1968 8–5 61.5% — 1,586 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1969 15–7 68.2% — 1,705 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 1970 11–7 61.1% — 1,756 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 1971 9–8 52.9% — 1,752 0 3
37 — — — — — — — 1972 3–6 33.3% — 1,659 0 3
38 — — — — — — — 1973 4–3 57.1% — 1,648 0 3
39 — — — — — — — 1974 6–6 50.0% — 1,641 0 3
40 — — — — — — — 1975 2–7 22.2% — 1,554 0 3
41 — — — — — — — 1976 0–2 0.0% — 1,548 0 3

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mary Ann Eisel Lea Pericoli
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 1968 1773 127.8 — — — — -14 -244 +92 60.9% +0.93 17–7 (71%) — — -1.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1969 1820 139.1 — — — — -21 -61 +133 65.7% +1.05 15–9 (63%) — — -5.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1970 1785 131.6 — — — — +107 -54 +100 60.3% +0.69 10–8 (56%) 1–0 — -1.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1971 1871 144.6 — — — — +33 -38 +3 55.4% +0.21 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 100.6 -4.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1972 1833 126.1 — — — — +22 — -11 45.8% -0.04 1–5 (17%) 1–1 — -1.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1973 1844 115.8 — — — — — +7 — 66.7% +1.33 — — — -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1974 1865 125.8 — — — — -56 +61 — 76.2% +1.67 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1975 1857 107.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1976 1845 104.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1586 120.0 — — — — +5 +12 — 70.8% +1.92 1–1 — — +0.13
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1705 134.1 — — — — — +26 — 67.3% +1.55 2–3 (40%) — — -1.00
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1757 135.6 — — — — — -3 -150 60.5% +1.24 3–1 (75%) — — -0.73
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1752 125.6 — — — — — +1 — 50.0% +0.08 3–1 (75%) — — -0.10
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1659 111.6 — — — — — +28 — 38.1% -0.48 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.57
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1648 114.4 — — — — — +17 — 80.0% +2.50 — — — +1.43
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1642 116.2 — — — — — +20 — 51.7% +0.03 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.2 +0.98
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1555 100.4 — — — — — +15 — 33.3% -1.19 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +1.40
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1548 102.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.12
Career — 1956 139.2 — — — — +14 -58 +93 61.0% +0.78 53–39 (58%) 8–9 (47%) 103.3 -5.67 — 1773 132.2 — — — — +5 +14 -150 56.0% +0.67 12–14 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 96.6 +2.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.