H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mary Ann Eisel vs Marie Pinterova H2H: 1-0
Mary Ann Eisel holds a 1–0 lead over Marie Pinterova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mary Ann Eisel leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mary Ann Eisel won the 1970 Wimbledon first round 7-5 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 79
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1970* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Mary Ann Eisel | 7-5 4-6 6-3 | Marie Pinterova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Ann Eisel | — | — | — | 1,945 | 172 | 95 | 64.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Marie Pinterova | — | — | — | 1,782 | 136 | 147 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Ann Eisel | Marie Pinterova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1969 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 7 | 1969 | 16–7 | 69.6% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1970 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 11 | 1970 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1971 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 11 | 1971 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 11 | 1972 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 11 | 1973 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1974 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 12 | 1974 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,711 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 12 | 1975 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 37–18 | 67.3% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 11 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 12 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 12 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 12 |