Mary Ann Eisel
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Billie Jean King | 0 | 8 | 8 | May 8, 1972 | H2H |
| Judy Tegart | 4 | 4 | 8 | Feb 2, 1971 | H2H |
| Rosie Casals | 1 | 6 | 7 | Aug 29, 1971 | H2H |
| Patti Hogan | 6 | 1 | 7 | May 30, 1970 | H2H |
| Kerry Reid | 1 | 5 | 6 | Sep 15, 1973 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC
Mary Ann Eisel vs Pam Teeguarden H2H: 3-1 (incl. walkovers)
Mary Ann Eisel vs Pam Teeguarden: 3–0 excluding walkovers; 3–1 including 1 walkover. Across 4 main-draw results including walkovers, Mary Ann Eisel leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Pam Teeguarden won the 1970 Curacao quarterfinal W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H including walkovers
3
–
1
4 main-draw results
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Teeguarden | (w/o) | Mary Ann Eisel | Match data | Mar 29, 1970* | QF | Curacao | WTA 250 | — |
| Mary Ann Eisel | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data | Mar 15, 1970* | QF | Caracas | WTA 250 | Clay |
| Mary Ann Eisel | 4-6 6-2 7-5 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data | Feb 26, 1970* | F | Agawam | WTA 250 | Hard |
| Mary Ann Eisel | 6-1 6-0 | Pam Teeguarden | Match data | May 30, 1969* | R16 | Surbiton | WTA 250 | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Ann Eisel | — | — | — | 1,956 | 172 | 95 | 64.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Pam Teeguarden | — | — | — | 1,922 | 246 | 297 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Ann Eisel | Pam Teeguarden | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 19–19 | 50.0% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 17–21 | 44.7% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1968 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 31–25 | 55.4% | — | 1,868 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1969 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 22–23 | 48.9% | — | 1,839 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1970 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 11 | 1974 | 22–18 | 55.0% | — | 1,901 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1971 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,870 | 0 | 11 | 1975 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 11 | 1976 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 11 | 1977 | 14–20 | 41.2% | — | 1,762 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1974 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 12 | 1978 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 12 | 1979 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 12 | 1980 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,802 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 20–19 | 51.3% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3–10 | 23.1% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 4 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Mary Ann Eisel | Pam Teeguarden | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 1968 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 27 | 9 | 36 | 75.0% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 1972 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1969 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 26 | 7 | 33 | 78.8% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 1973 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% |
| 23 | 1970 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1974 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% |
| 24 | 1971 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 1975 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 8 | 9 | 11.1% |
| 25 | 1972 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1976 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% |
| 26 | 1973 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% |
| 27 | 1974 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 0 | 6 | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1978 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% |
| 28 | 1975 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% |
| 29 | 1976 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 16 | 12 | 28 | 57.1% | 46 | 24 | 70 | 65.7% | 75 | 29 | 104 | 72.1% | 34 | 28 | 62 | 54.8% | — | 57 | 66 | 123 | 46.3% | 70 | 82 | 152 | 46.1% | 75 | 65 | 140 | 53.6% | 36 | 83 | 119 | 30.3% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Mary Ann Eisel | Pam Teeguarden | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1489 | 104.8 | — | — | — | — | +4 | -5 | +11 | 45.0% | -0.33 | 1–5 (17%) | — | — | -0.27 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 1494 | 104.2 | — | — | — | — | — | -42 | +25 | 36.1% | -1.11 | 1–3 (25%) | — | — | -0.40 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1613 | 133.6 | — | — | — | — | +18 | -130 | -29 | 52.9% | +0.58 | 2–9 (18%) | 0–1 | — | -0.45 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1679 | 136.1 | — | — | — | — | +4 | -80 | -95 | 47.1% | +0.06 | 3–6 (33%) | 0–2 | — | -0.97 |
| 21 | 1968 | 1773 | 127.8 | — | — | — | — | -14 | -244 | +92 | 60.9% | +0.93 | 17–7 (71%) | — | — | -1.99 | 1972 | 1868 | 151.0 | — | — | — | — | -247 | -107 | -5 | 55.4% | +0.26 | 4–9 (31%) | 1–1 | — | -7.18 |
| 22 | 1969 | 1820 | 139.1 | — | — | — | — | -21 | -61 | +133 | 65.7% | +1.05 | 15–9 (63%) | — | — | -5.01 | 1973 | 1839 | 149.0 | — | — | — | — | -139 | -96 | +71 | 50.5% | -0.06 | 6–9 (40%) | 4–4 (50%) | 100.2 | -9.05 |
| 23 | 1970 | 1785 | 131.6 | — | — | — | — | +107 | -54 | +100 | 60.3% | +0.69 | 10–8 (56%) | 1–0 | — | -1.37 | 1974 | 1902 | 145.5 | — | — | — | — | -77 | -170 | +7 | 52.8% | +0.33 | 6–3 (67%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | -4.34 |
| 24 | 1971 | 1871 | 144.6 | — | — | — | — | +33 | -38 | +3 | 55.4% | +0.21 | 7–6 (54%) | 5–6 (45%) | 100.6 | -4.54 | 1975 | 1817 | 144.3 | — | — | — | — | -102 | +1 | +94 | 46.8% | -0.11 | 8–9 (47%) | 6–6 (50%) | 99.4 | -4.08 |
| 25 | 1972 | 1833 | 126.1 | — | — | — | — | +22 | — | -11 | 45.8% | -0.04 | 1–5 (17%) | 1–1 | — | -1.40 | 1976 | 1779 | 135.2 | — | — | — | — | -111 | -7 | +168 | 38.0% | -1.00 | 3–5 (38%) | — | — | -3.53 |
| 26 | 1973 | 1844 | 115.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +7 | — | 66.7% | +1.33 | — | — | — | -0.50 | 1977 | 1763 | 141.5 | — | — | — | — | -105 | 0 | +158 | 41.4% | -0.63 | 3–3 (50%) | 4–7 (36%) | 98.3 | -3.44 |
| 27 | 1974 | 1865 | 125.8 | — | — | — | — | -56 | +61 | — | 76.2% | +1.67 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.04 | 1978 | 1724 | 122.7 | — | — | — | — | -143 | -12 | +180 | 36.8% | -0.90 | 5–5 (50%) | 3–6 (33%) | 97.4 | -2.11 |
| 28 | 1975 | 1857 | 107.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.07 | 1979 | 1746 | 144.0 | — | — | — | — | -120 | -19 | +184 | 42.7% | -0.37 | 5–6 (45%) | 4–7 (36%) | 99.3 | -1.56 |
| 29 | 1976 | 1845 | 104.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.12 | 1980 | 1802 | 134.4 | — | — | — | — | -98 | -69 | +93 | 48.1% | -0.16 | 7–6 (54%) | 3–4 (43%) | 101.0 | -1.72 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1789 | 134.6 | — | — | — | — | -128 | -12 | +88 | 52.2% | +0.34 | 6–8 (43%) | 3–4 (43%) | 97.5 | -0.17 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1683 | 118.4 | — | — | — | — | -148 | — | +191 | 31.3% | -1.16 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–1 | — | +0.19 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1652 | 106.0 | — | — | — | — | -83 | +79 | — | 45.8% | -0.13 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–3 (40%) | 96.0 | +0.80 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1615 | 107.2 | — | — | — | — | -38 | +70 | +200 | 40.9% | -0.93 | 4–2 (67%) | 3–1 (75%) | 105.0 | +1.32 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1588 | 113.3 | — | — | — | — | -40 | — | — | 11.1% | -2.78 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.53 |
| Career | — | 1956 | 139.2 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -58 | +93 | 61.0% | +0.78 | 53–39 (58%) | 8–9 (47%) | 103.3 | -5.67 | — | 1923 | 143.0 | — | — | — | — | -97 | -51 | +59 | 46.5% | -0.19 | 67–96 (41%) | 36–49 (42%) | 93.3 | -6.98 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Pam Teeguarden
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Wade | 0 | 16 | 16 | Sep 3, 1981 | H2H |
| Rosie Casals | 2 | 14 | 16 | Mar 26, 1980 | H2H |
| Kerry Reid | 0 | 16 | 16 | Nov 8, 1979 | H2H |
| Billie Jean King | 1 | 9 | 10 | Nov 23, 1979 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 2 | 7 | 9 | May 29, 1985 | H2H |