H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mary Ann Eisel vs Patricia Walkden H2H: 3-1
Mary Ann Eisel holds a 3–1 lead over Patricia Walkden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mary Ann Eisel leads 3–0 on carpet, while Patricia Walkden leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Patricia Walkden won the 1970 Haverford quarterfinal 4-6 8-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 80
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 1970* | Haverford | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Patricia Walkden | 4-6 8-6 6-2 | Mary Ann Eisel | Match data |
| Nov 25, 1968* | London | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Mary Ann Eisel | 7-9 7-5 17-15 | Patricia Walkden | Match data |
| Nov 9, 1968* | Torquay | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Mary Ann Eisel | 2-6 6-2 7-5 | Patricia Walkden | Match data |
| Oct 27, 1968* | Perth Scotland | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Mary Ann Eisel | 6-3 6-4 | Patricia Walkden | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Ann Eisel | — | — | — | 1,945 | 172 | 95 | 64.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Patricia Walkden | — | — | — | 1,941 | 218 | 104 | 67.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Ann Eisel | Patricia Walkden | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 7 | 1968 | 48–23 | 67.6% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1970 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 11 | 1969 | 53–18 | 74.6% | — | 1,879 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1971 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 11 | 1970 | 49–24 | 67.1% | — | 1,888 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 11 | 1971 | 9–3 | 75.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 11 | 1972 | 31–17 | 64.6% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 1974 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 12 | 1973 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 12 | 1974 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 12 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 12 |