H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Mary Ann Eisel vs Pixie Lamm H2H: 2-0

Mary Ann Eisel holds a 2–0 lead over Pixie Lamm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mary Ann Eisel leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Mary Ann Eisel won the 1968 Locust Valley round of 16 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Ann Eisel
USA Age 79 Right-Handed
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Pixie Lamm
USA

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mary Ann Eisel 6-3 6-3 Pixie Lamm Match data Aug 9, 1968* R16 Locust Valley WTA 250 Grass
Mary Ann Eisel 4-6 6-4 7-5 Pixie Lamm Match data Aug 2, 1968* R16 South Orange WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mary Ann Eisel — — — 1,956 172 95 64.4% 0 0 0 0 12 12
Pixie Lamm — — — 1,571 14 13 51.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Ann Eisel Pixie Lamm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 1968 8–9 47.1% — 1,503 0 0
21 1968 45–22 67.2% — 1,772 0 3 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,544 0 0
22 1969 54–23 70.1% — 1,820 0 7 1970 2–2 50.0% — 1,543 0 0
23 1970 33–20 62.3% — 1,784 0 11 — — — — — — —
24 1971 26–19 57.8% — 1,870 0 11 — — — — — — —
25 1972 3–6 33.3% — 1,832 0 11 — — — — — — —
26 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,844 0 11 — — — — — — —
27 1974 7–2 77.8% — 1,865 0 12 — — — — — — —
28 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,856 0 12 — — — — — — —
29 1976 1–1 50.0% — 1,844 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mary Ann Eisel Pixie Lamm
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 5 8 13 38.5% — — — —
21 1968 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 27 9 36 75.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 1969 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1969 1 3 4 25.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 26 7 33 78.8% 10 5 15 66.7% 1970 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1970 5 1 6 83.3% 10 8 18 55.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1971 4 3 7 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1972 — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1974 — — — — 6 0 6 100.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1975 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1976 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 16 12 28 57.1% 46 24 70 65.7% 75 29 104 72.1% 34 28 62 54.8% — 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mary Ann Eisel Pixie Lamm
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1503 112.8 — — — — +97 — -19 51.2% +0.51 2–5 (29%) — — +0.49
21 1968 1773 127.8 — — — — -14 -244 +92 60.9% +0.93 17–7 (71%) — — -1.99 1969 1544 109.5 — — — — +130 — — 64.3% +1.07 1–1 — — +0.81
22 1969 1820 139.1 — — — — -21 -61 +133 65.7% +1.05 15–9 (63%) — — -5.01 1970 1543 97.4 — — — — +131 — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — +0.75
23 1970 1785 131.6 — — — — +107 -54 +100 60.3% +0.69 10–8 (56%) 1–0 — -1.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1971 1871 144.6 — — — — +33 -38 +3 55.4% +0.21 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) — -4.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1972 1833 126.1 — — — — +22 — -11 45.8% -0.04 1–5 (17%) 1–1 — -1.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1973 1844 115.8 — — — — — +7 — 66.7% +1.33 — — — -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1974 1865 125.8 — — — — -56 +61 — 76.2% +1.67 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1975 1857 107.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1976 1845 104.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1956 139.2 — — — — +14 -58 +93 61.0% +0.78 53–39 (58%) 8–9 (47%) 103.3 -5.67 — 1571 109.8 — — — — +120 — -19 54.0% +0.47 3–6 (33%) — — +7.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.