H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Mary Ann Eisel vs Shirley Bloomer H2H: 3-0

Mary Ann Eisel holds a 3–0 lead over Shirley Bloomer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mary Ann Eisel leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mary Ann Eisel won the 1972 Wimbledon round of 64 6-2 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Ann Eisel
USA Age 79 Right-Handed
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Shirley Bloomer
GBR

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mary Ann Eisel 6-2 4-6 6-3 Shirley Bloomer Match data Jun 30, 1972* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Mary Ann Eisel 8-6 6-3 Shirley Bloomer Match data May 16, 1969* R16 Hurlingham WTA 250 Clay
Mary Ann Eisel 4-6 6-4 6-3 Shirley Bloomer Match data May 9, 1969* R16 Guildford WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mary Ann Eisel — — — 1,956 172 95 64.4% 0 0 0 0 12 12
Shirley Bloomer — — — 1,790 84 56 60.0% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Mary Ann Eisel Shirley Bloomer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1968 45–22 67.2% — 1,772 0 3 1968 18–7 72.0% — 1,627 0 1
1969 54–23 70.1% — 1,820 0 7 1969 18–10 64.3% — 1,683 0 2
1970 33–20 62.3% — 1,784 0 11 1970 12–12 50.0% — 1,671 0 2
1971 26–19 57.8% — 1,870 0 11 1971 22–11 66.7% — 1,759 0 3
1972 3–6 33.3% — 1,832 0 11 1972 8–6 57.1% — 1,693 0 3
1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,844 0 11 1973 3–6 33.3% — 1,622 0 3
1974 7–2 77.8% — 1,865 0 12 1974 2–4 33.3% — 1,584 0 3
1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,856 0 12 1979 1–0 100.0% — 1,600 0 4
1976 1–1 50.0% — 1,844 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Mary Ann Eisel Shirley Bloomer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1968 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 27 9 36 75.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 1968 — — — — 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
1969 1 3 4 25.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 26 7 33 78.8% 10 5 15 66.7% 1969 — — — — 11 5 16 68.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — —
1970 5 1 6 83.3% 10 8 18 55.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1970 — — — — 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — —
1971 4 3 7 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 1971 — — — — 16 5 21 76.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
1972 — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1972 — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1973 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
1974 — — — — 6 0 6 100.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1974 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
1975 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 — — — — 1 0 1 100.0% — — — — — — — —
1976 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 16 12 28 57.1% 46 24 70 65.7% 75 29 104 72.1% 34 28 62 54.8% Career — — — — 59 29 88 67.0% 25 26 51 49.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Mary Ann Eisel Shirley Bloomer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1968 1773 127.8 — — — — -14 -244 +92 60.9% +0.93 17–7 (71%) — — -1.99 1968 1627 117.5 — — — — — +42 -31 65.5% +1.29 5–2 (71%) — — +0.66
1969 1820 139.1 — — — — -21 -61 +133 65.7% +1.05 15–9 (63%) — — -5.01 1969 1684 131.7 — — — — — +59 -38 61.5% +1.29 5–4 (56%) — — +0.36
1970 1785 131.6 — — — — +107 -54 +100 60.3% +0.69 10–8 (56%) 1–0 — -1.37 1970 1672 126.4 — — — — — +90 -61 58.8% +0.59 1–6 (14%) — — -1.23
1971 1871 144.6 — — — — +33 -38 +3 55.4% +0.21 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 100.6 -4.54 1971 1759 138.0 — — — — — +98 -93 64.1% +1.27 3–1 (75%) — — +0.60
1972 1833 126.1 — — — — +22 — -11 45.8% -0.04 1–5 (17%) 1–1 — -1.40 1972 1694 114.5 — — — — — +114 -46 62.1% +1.10 1–2 (33%) — — +1.38
1973 1844 115.8 — — — — — +7 — 66.7% +1.33 — — — -0.50 1973 1622 111.9 — — — — — +122 -36 36.8% -0.11 0–1 0–1 — +0.27
1974 1865 125.8 — — — — -56 +61 — 76.2% +1.67 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.04 1974 1584 100.3 — — — — — +127 — 42.9% -1.29 0–2 1–0 — +0.64
1975 1857 107.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 — — -0.07 1979 1600 104.4 — — — — — — — 66.7% +2.33 1–0 — — +0.20
1976 1845 104.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1956 139.2 — — — — +14 -58 +93 61.0% +0.78 53–39 (58%) 8–9 (47%) 103.3 -5.67 Career 1790 131.2 — — — — — +84 -54 60.0% +0.95 16–18 (47%) 1–1 — +2.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.