H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mary Ann Eisel vs Shirley Bloomer H2H: 3-0
Mary Ann Eisel holds a 3–0 lead over Shirley Bloomer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mary Ann Eisel leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mary Ann Eisel won the 1972 Wimbledon second round 6-2 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 1972* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Mary Ann Eisel | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | Shirley Bloomer | Match data |
| May 16, 1969* | Hurlingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Mary Ann Eisel | 8-6 6-3 | Shirley Bloomer | Match data |
| May 9, 1969* | Guildford | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Mary Ann Eisel | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Shirley Bloomer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Ann Eisel | — | — | — | 1,945 | 172 | 95 | 64.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Shirley Bloomer | — | — | — | 1,769 | 84 | 56 | 60.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Ann Eisel | Shirley Bloomer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 18–7 | 72.0% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 1969 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 7 | 1969 | 18–10 | 64.3% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 2 |
| 1970 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 11 | 1970 | 12–12 | 50.0% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 2 |
| 1971 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 11 | 1971 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 3 |
| 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 11 | 1972 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 11 | 1973 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 3 |
| 1974 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 12 | 1974 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 3 |
| 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 12 | 1979 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 4 |
| 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |