H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mary Ann Eisel vs Tory Ann Fretz H2H: 4-0
Mary Ann Eisel holds a 4–0 lead over Tory Ann Fretz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mary Ann Eisel leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Ann Eisel won the 1971 Kansas City semifinal 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 1971* | Kansas City | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Mary Ann Eisel | 7-6 6-3 | Tory Ann Fretz | Match data |
| Apr 18, 1971* | Las Vegas | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Mary Ann Eisel | 6-4 7-5 | Tory Ann Fretz | Match data |
| Aug 1, 1969* | Orange | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Mary Ann Eisel | 6-4 6-4 | Tory Ann Fretz | Match data |
| Aug 10, 1968* | Locust Valley | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Mary Ann Eisel | 6-2 6-2 | Tory Ann Fretz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Ann Eisel | — | — | — | 1,945 | 172 | 95 | 64.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Tory Ann Fretz | — | — | — | 1,802 | 104 | 102 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Ann Eisel | Tory Ann Fretz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 11 | 1968 | 28–14 | 66.7% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 11 | 1969 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1974 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 12 | 1970 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 12 | 1971 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 10–20 | 33.3% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |