H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mary Ann Eisel vs Valerie Ziegenfuss H2H: 3-2
Mary Ann Eisel holds a 3–2 lead over Valerie Ziegenfuss in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Mary Ann Eisel leads 2–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Valerie Ziegenfuss won the 1971 Kansas City final 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 1971* | Kansas City | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Valerie Ziegenfuss | 6-1 6-4 | Mary Ann Eisel | Match data |
| Apr 3, 1971* | San Juan | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Mary Ann Eisel | 6-2 6-4 | Valerie Ziegenfuss | Match data |
| May 30, 1970* | Surbiton | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Mary Ann Eisel | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Valerie Ziegenfuss | Match data |
| Apr 5, 1970* | San Juan | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Valerie Ziegenfuss | 8-6 6-2 | Mary Ann Eisel | Match data |
| Jun 7, 1969* | Manchester | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Mary Ann Eisel | 6-0 7-5 | Valerie Ziegenfuss | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Ann Eisel | — | — | — | 1,945 | 172 | 95 | 64.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Valerie Ziegenfuss | — | — | — | 1,952 | 231 | 232 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Ann Eisel | Valerie Ziegenfuss | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 35–24 | 59.3% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 28–24 | 53.8% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1968 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 40–28 | 58.8% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1969 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 7 | 1971 | 23–29 | 44.2% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1970 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 11 | 1972 | 26–24 | 52.0% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1971 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 11 | 1973 | 33–29 | 53.2% | — | 1,759 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 11 | 1974 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 11 | 1975 | 16–16 | 50.0% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1974 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 12 | 1976 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 12 | 1977 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 12 | 1978 | 3–11 | 21.4% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 3 |