H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Mary Ann Eisel vs Victoria Rogers H2H: 0-2

Victoria Rogers holds a 2–0 lead over Mary Ann Eisel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Victoria Rogers leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Victoria Rogers won the 1968 Manchester round of 32 4-6 8-6 6-3.

USA Age 79 Right-Handed
H2H
0 2
2 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Victoria Rogers 4-6 8-6 6-3 Mary Ann Eisel Match data Jun 7, 1968* R32 Manchester WTA 250 Grass
Victoria Rogers 7-5 6-3 Mary Ann Eisel Match data Jun 1, 1968* QF Surbiton WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mary Ann Eisel 1,956 172 95 64.4% 0 0 0 0 12 12
Victoria Rogers 1,739 40 25 61.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Ann Eisel Victoria Rogers
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1968 37–22 62.7% 1,702 0 0
19 1969 3–3 50.0% 1,704 0 0
21 1968 45–22 67.2% 1,772 0 3
22 1969 54–23 70.1% 1,820 0 7
23 1970 33–20 62.3% 1,784 0 11
24 1971 26–19 57.8% 1,870 0 11
25 1972 3–6 33.3% 1,832 0 11
26 1973 2–1 66.7% 1,844 0 11
27 1974 7–2 77.8% 1,865 0 12
28 1975 1–1 50.0% 1,856 0 12
29 1976 1–1 50.0% 1,844 0 12

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mary Ann Eisel Victoria Rogers
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1968 1703 119.4 -231 -131 +102 60.9% +0.72 8–7 (53%) -1.44
19 1969 1705 112.9 -143 46.2% -0.39 1–0 -0.48
21 1968 1773 127.8 -14 -244 +92 60.9% +0.93 17–7 (71%) -1.99
22 1969 1820 139.1 -21 -61 +133 65.7% +1.05 15–9 (63%) -5.01
23 1970 1785 131.6 +107 -54 +100 60.3% +0.69 10–8 (56%) 1–0 -1.37
24 1971 1871 144.6 +33 -38 +3 55.4% +0.21 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 100.6 -4.54
25 1972 1833 126.1 +22 -11 45.8% -0.04 1–5 (17%) 1–1 -1.40
26 1973 1844 115.8 +7 66.7% +1.33 -0.50
27 1974 1865 125.8 -56 +61 76.2% +1.67 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) -0.04
28 1975 1857 107.1 50.0% +0.50 1–1 -0.07
29 1976 1845 104.6 50.0% +0.50 1–1 +0.12
Career 1956 139.2 +14 -58 +93 61.0% +0.78 53–39 (58%) 8–9 (47%) 103.3 -5.67 1740 118.2 -193 -131 +102 59.6% +0.62 9–7 (56%) -2.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.