H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mary Ann Eisel vs Wendy Overton H2H: 1-2
Wendy Overton holds a 2–1 lead over Mary Ann Eisel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Wendy Overton leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wendy Overton won the 1975 Atlanta third round 1-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 1975* | Atlanta | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Wendy Overton | 1-6 6-4 6-4 | Mary Ann Eisel | Match data |
| Feb 20, 1972* | Oklahoma City | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Wendy Overton | 3-6 7-5 6-0 | Mary Ann Eisel | Match data |
| Aug 8, 1971* | Houston | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Mary Ann Eisel | 5-7 7-6 6-4 | Wendy Overton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Ann Eisel | — | — | — | 1,945 | 172 | 95 | 64.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Wendy Overton | — | — | — | 1,920 | 123 | 142 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Ann Eisel | Wendy Overton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1969 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 7 | 1969 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1970 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 11 | 1970 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1971 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 11 | 1971 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 11 | 1972 | 40–30 | 57.1% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 11 | 1973 | 14–23 | 37.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1974 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 12 | 1974 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 12 | 1975 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 12 | 1976 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |