H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Mary Joe Fernandez vs Isabelle Demongeot H2H: 6-0

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 6–0 lead over Isabelle Demongeot in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 3–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1993 Berlin Open round of 32 6-0 6-3.

USA Age 55 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 0
6 main-draw meetings
FRA Age 59 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mary Joe Fernandez #8 6-0 6-3 Isabelle Demongeot #112 Match data May 13, 1993* R32 Berlin Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Mary Joe Fernandez #7 1-6 7-5 6-2 Isabelle Demongeot #94 Match data Mar 14, 1993* R64 Key Biscayne Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Mary Joe Fernandez #7 6-3 6-4 Isabelle Demongeot #72 Match data May 7, 1992* R32 Italian Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Mary Joe Fernandez #22 7-5 6-2 Isabelle Demongeot #50 Match data Mar 9, 1988* R64 Boca Raton Category 5 modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Mary Joe Fernandez #28 6-4 6-3 Isabelle Demongeot #71 Match data Feb 24, 1987* R128 Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard
Mary Joe Fernandez #25 7-6 7-5 Isabelle Demongeot #118 Match data Jun 18, 1986* R64 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,196 417 195 68.1% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Isabelle Demongeot #522 #35 69 1,841 119 157 43.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Joe Fernandez Isabelle Demongeot
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 1984 0–2 0.0% 1,474 0 0
13 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,553 0 0
14 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,765 0 0
15 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,896 0 0
16 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,947 0 0
17 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,985 0 0 1984 1–1 50.0% #165 1,513 0 0
18 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,125 0 2 1985 4–7 36.4% #135 1,520 0 0
19 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2 1986 11–15 42.3% #65 1,608 0 0
20 1992 51–17 75.0% #6 2,121 0 2 1987 17–20 45.9% #53 1,732 0 0
21 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,058 0 3 1988 19–19 50.0% #45 1,759 0 0
22 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,977 0 4 1989 18–15 54.5% #46 1,766 0 0
23 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,039 0 6 1990 15–17 46.9% #78 1,687 0 0
24 1996 30–17 63.8% #16 1,935 0 6 1991 13–14 48.1% #63 1,683 0 1
25 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,990 0 7 1992 7–17 29.2% #136 1,626 0 1
26 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,935 0 7 1993 5–11 31.2% #150 1,592 0 1
27 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,901 0 7 1994 3–9 25.0% #130 1,541 0 1
28 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,880 0 7 1995 5–9 35.7% #160 1,546 0 1
29 1996 1–3 25.0% #242 1,529 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mary Joe Fernandez Isabelle Demongeot
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
12 1984 0 2 2 0.0%
13 1985 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
14 1986 7 5 12 58.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
15 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
16 1988 11 5 16 68.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1989 11 6 17 64.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 1984 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1990 17 4 21 81.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 2 15 86.7% 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1991 22 8 30 73.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 1986 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
20 1992 27 8 35 77.1% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1987 7 8 15 46.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
21 1993 16 4 20 80.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1988 5 8 13 38.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1994 13 5 18 72.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1995 14 4 18 77.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1991 10 8 18 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 1997 22 8 30 73.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 3 11 14 21.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1998 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1999 9 8 17 52.9% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 203 91 294 69.0% 109 49 158 69.0% 55 22 77 71.4% 50 33 83 60.2% 58 70 128 45.3% 30 43 73 41.1% 19 23 42 45.2% 12 21 33 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mary Joe Fernandez Isabelle Demongeot
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
12 1984 1475 98.2 20.0% -1.20 0–1 +0.18
13 1985 1554 130.0 +65 50.0% +0.04 0–2 2–0 -0.49
14 1986 1765 147.3 -82 -11 -174 54.2% +0.32 5–3 (63%) 4–2 (67%) 107.3 -4.54
15 1987 1897 158.0 -60 -77 -252 61.2% +1.15 5–4 (56%) 2–4 (33%) 100.5 -5.16
16 1988 1947 151.0 -47 -156 -175 68.2% +1.45 5–1 (83%) 0–4 (0%) 103.5 -2.13
17 1989 1986 162.4 -24 -108 -155 63.2% +1.20 9–3 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 104.1 -2.80 1984 1514 102.8 50.0% +0.50 +0.09
18 1990 2126 168.3 +40 -229 -238 79.2% +2.17 7–2 (78%) 4–0 (100%) 107.8 +0.66 1985 1520 106.0 +7 +100 36.4% -0.95 +0.76
19 1991 2063 164.9 +20 -103 -62 69.6% +1.53 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 97.9 -0.78 1986 1609 129.8 -40 -65 +53 45.8% -0.20 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 96.1 +0.38
20 1992 2121 171.9 +33 -59 -48 69.4% +1.32 11–2 (85%) 6–5 (55%) 106.9 -1.97 1987 1732 140.6 -56 -238 +22 45.2% -0.20 6–4 (60%) 0–1 -0.92
21 1993 2058 164.0 +1 +127 -28 66.1% +1.05 11–4 (73%) 9–3 (75%) 105.3 +0.67 1988 1759 143.5 -71 -64 -55 53.9% +0.18 5–10 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 100.3 -3.79
22 1994 1977 147.9 +8 +146 +2 66.2% +0.96 6–5 (55%) 6–2 (75%) 99.6 +0.06 1989 1766 145.5 -4 -36 -73 53.3% +0.31 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 101.0 -3.59
23 1995 2039 159.3 +38 -7 -10 64.8% +1.11 10–1 (91%) 4–3 (57%) 107.6 -0.51 1990 1688 134.0 +77 -6 43.5% -0.58 5–4 (56%) 3–1 (75%) 103.7 -1.98
24 1996 1935 158.7 -4 +81 +198 61.9% +1.09 7–0 (100%) 2–6 (25%) 103.3 -1.36 1991 1683 123.3 +67 -79 52.5% -0.12 2–5 (29%) 6–1 (86%) 98.5 +0.46
25 1997 1990 164.4 +18 +53 +117 66.9% +1.20 10–5 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 -1.63 1992 1626 122.8 -19 -17 +52 32.7% -0.90 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 96.6 -1.74
26 1998 1935 150.6 +21 50.0% -0.03 3–1 (75%) 4–2 (67%) 101.7 -1.81 1993 1593 116.2 +3 -6 33.3% -1.23 4–3 (57%) 1–0 -0.63
27 1999 1902 152.1 -1 +93 56.5% +0.72 6–5 (55%) 1–6 (14%) 93.5 -2.78 1994 1542 110.1 +37 +40 29.6% -1.11 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.9 +0.54
28 2000 1881 102.8 0.0% -2.00 -0.21 1995 1547 116.6 +52 -12 +36 38.7% -0.45 1–2 (33%) 0–1 -0.04
29 1996 1530 101.6 25.0% -1.88 1–0 +0.15
Career 2197 168.6 +6 -13 -56 64.9% +1.15 100–45 (69%) 53–48 (52%) 107.6 -4.04 1842 138.1 +1 -50 +21 44.7% -0.34 32–42 (43%) 24–19 (56%) 99.7 -3.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.