H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mary Joe Fernandez vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 1-2
Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 2–1 lead over Mary Joe Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Mary Joe Fernandez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1994 Strasbourg semifinal 3-6 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 1994* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | SF | Clay | Mary Joe Fernandez | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | Kimiko Date Krumm | Match data |
| Jan 16, 1994* | Sydney | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Kimiko Date Krumm | 6-4 6-2 | Mary Joe Fernandez | Match data |
| Mar 17, 1993* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Kimiko Date Krumm | 7-6 6-3 | Mary Joe Fernandez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Joe Fernandez | #136 | #4 | 2,114 | 2,191 | 409 | 192 | 68.1% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| Kimiko Date Krumm | — | — | — | 2,091 | 241 | 188 | 56.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Joe Fernandez | Kimiko Date Krumm | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 12 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | 1985 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1986 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #27 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1987 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #20 | 1,895 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,977 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 40–10 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 47–18 | 72.3% | #8 | 2,062 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,108 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #7 | 2,054 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 26–13 | 66.7% | — | 1,867 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1994 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #14 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 25–11 | 69.4% | — | 1,956 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1995 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #8 | 2,038 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,987 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1996 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #16 | 1,926 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 39–12 | 76.5% | — | 2,029 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1997 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #10 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 31–13 | 70.5% | — | 2,071 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 1998 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,932 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1999 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #38 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,869 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,042 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 7–24 | 22.6% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 8 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 8 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 8 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 8 |
| 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 8 |
| 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 8 |