H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mary Joe Fernandez vs Leila Meskhi H2H: 3-0
Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 3–0 lead over Leila Meskhi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1993 Montreal fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
GEO
Age 58
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 1993* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Mary Joe Fernandez | 6-3 6-3 | Leila Meskhi | Match data |
| Jan 11, 1992* | Sydney | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Mary Joe Fernandez | 6-1 6-2 | Leila Meskhi | Match data |
| Jun 24, 1988* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Mary Joe Fernandez | 6-1 7-5 | Leila Meskhi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Joe Fernandez | #136 | #4 | 2,114 | 2,191 | 409 | 192 | 68.1% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| Leila Meskhi | #903 | #12 | 72 | 2,001 | 192 | 119 | 61.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Joe Fernandez | Leila Meskhi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 12 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | 1985 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1986 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #27 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1987 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #20 | 1,895 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,977 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 40–10 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 47–18 | 72.3% | #8 | 2,062 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #46 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,108 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #7 | 2,054 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1994 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #14 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #19 | 1,928 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1995 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #8 | 2,038 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1996 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #16 | 1,926 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1997 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #10 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #37 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1998 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,932 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1999 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #38 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,834 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,869 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #838 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 |