H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Mary Joe Fernandez vs Mareen Louie Harper H2H: 1-1
Mary Joe Fernandez and Mareen Louie Harper are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1989 Boca Raton fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 65
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 1989* | Boca Raton | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Mary Joe Fernandez | 6-3 6-4 | Mareen Louie Harper | Match data |
| Oct 4, 1985* | Fort Lauderdale | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Mareen Louie Harper | 2-6 6-2 6-4 | Mary Joe Fernandez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Joe Fernandez | #136 | #4 | 2,114 | 2,191 | 409 | 192 | 68.1% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| Mareen Louie Harper | — | — | — | 1,911 | 177 | 239 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Joe Fernandez | Mareen Louie Harper | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 12 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | 1985 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | 1986 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #27 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1987 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #20 | 1,895 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1988 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1989 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,977 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 40–10 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 47–18 | 72.3% | #8 | 2,062 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 22–23 | 48.9% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,108 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 16–20 | 44.4% | — | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #7 | 2,054 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 9–18 | 33.3% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #14 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #8 | 2,038 | 0 | 6 | 1984 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1996 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #16 | 1,926 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 29–18 | 61.7% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1997 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #10 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1998 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,932 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1999 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #38 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,869 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 2 |