H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC

Mary Joe Fernandez vs Naoko Sawamatsu H2H: 3-3

Mary Joe Fernandez and Naoko Sawamatsu are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Naoko Sawamatsu leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Naoko Sawamatsu won the 1997 Filderstadt fourth round 6-2 0-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Joe Fernandez
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Naoko Sawamatsu
JPN Age 53 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 10, 1997* Filderstadt WTA 250 R16 Hard Naoko Sawamatsu #41 6-2 0-6 6-3 Mary Joe Fernandez #12 Match data
Mar 4, 1995* Indian Wells WTA 1000 SF Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #19 6-4 6-1 Naoko Sawamatsu #16 Match data
Jan 25, 1995* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Naoko Sawamatsu #26 6-4 7-6(5) Mary Joe Fernandez #19 Match data
Jun 26, 1994* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Naoko Sawamatsu #28 6-0 7-5 Mary Joe Fernandez #12 Match data
Jan 24, 1993* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #6 2-6 6-3 6-1 Naoko Sawamatsu #22 Match data
Jan 20, 1991* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #4 6-1 6-1 Naoko Sawamatsu #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7
Naoko Sawamatsu #266 #14 881 1,971 182 127 58.9% 0 0 0 3 1 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Joe Fernandez Naoko Sawamatsu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0 — — — — — — —
13 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0 1989 0–2 0.0% #262 1,478 0 0
17 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0 1990 14–6 70.0% #31 1,669 0 1
18 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2 1991 21–16 56.8% #33 1,723 0 1
19 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2 1992 23–12 65.7% #24 1,865 0 1
20 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2 1993 24–13 64.9% #28 1,855 0 2
21 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3 1994 24–12 66.7% #26 1,872 0 3
22 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4 1995 22–13 62.9% #17 1,848 0 3
23 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6 1996 18–16 52.9% #38 1,807 0 3
24 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6 1997 24–19 55.8% #34 1,847 0 4
25 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7 1998 12–18 40.0% #55 1,720 0 4
26 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7 — — — — — — —
27 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7 — — — — — — —
28 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7 — — — — — — —