H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Mary Joe Fernandez vs Natalia Medvedeva H2H: 2-0

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 2–0 lead over Natalia Medvedeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1992 US Open round of 64 3-6 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Joe Fernandez
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Natalia Medvedeva
UKR Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mary Joe Fernandez #7 3-6 6-3 6-1 Natalia Medvedeva #35 Match data Sep 3, 1992* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Mary Joe Fernandez #9 6-1 6-3 Natalia Medvedeva #99 Match data Jun 22, 1990* R16 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,196 417 195 68.1% 0 1 0 5 1 7
Natalia Medvedeva #387 #23 295 1,882 111 111 50.0% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Joe Fernandez Natalia Medvedeva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,474 0 0 — — — — — — —
13 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,553 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,765 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,896 0 0 1987 0–1 0.0% #197 1,499 0 0
16 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,947 0 0 1988 0–3 0.0% #317 1,473 0 0
17 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,985 0 0 1989 10–9 52.6% #67 1,613 0 0
18 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,125 0 2 1990 15–16 48.4% #56 1,699 0 1
19 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2 1991 9–10 47.4% #83 1,700 0 1
20 1992 51–17 75.0% #6 2,121 0 2 1992 20–16 55.6% #41 1,712 0 2
21 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,058 0 3 1993 24–13 64.9% #23 1,871 0 4
22 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,977 0 4 1994 17–21 44.7% #57 1,771 0 4
23 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,039 0 6 1995 9–12 42.9% #79 1,694 0 4
24 1996 30–17 63.8% #16 1,935 0 6 1996 6–8 42.9% #88 1,691 0 4
25 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,990 0 7 1997 1–2 33.3% #388 1,669 0 4
26 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,935 0 7 — — — — — — —
27 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,901 0 7 — — — — — — —
28 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,880 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mary Joe Fernandez Natalia Medvedeva
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
12 1984 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
13 1985 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1986 7 5 12 58.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1987 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 1988 11 5 16 68.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 1989 11 6 17 64.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 1989 5 4 9 55.6% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
18 1990 17 4 21 81.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 2 15 86.7% 1990 11 8 19 57.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1991 22 8 30 73.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 1991 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1992 27 8 35 77.1% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1992 12 11 23 52.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3%
21 1993 16 4 20 80.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1993 16 6 22 72.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1994 13 5 18 72.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 15 13 28 53.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1995 14 4 18 77.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1995 6 8 14 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
25 1997 22 8 30 73.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1998 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1999 9 8 17 52.9% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 203 91 294 69.0% 109 49 158 69.0% 55 22 77 71.4% 50 33 83 60.2% — 75 63 138 54.3% 15 23 38 39.5% 8 13 21 38.1% 13 12 25 52.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mary Joe Fernandez Natalia Medvedeva
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
12 1984 1475 98.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 — — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
13 1985 1554 130.0 — — — — +65 — — 50.0% +0.04 0–2 2–0 — -0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1986 1765 147.3 — — — — -82 -11 -174 54.2% +0.32 5–3 (63%) 4–2 (67%) 107.3 -4.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1987 1897 158.0 — — — — -60 -77 -252 61.2% +1.15 5–4 (56%) 2–4 (33%) 100.5 -5.16 1987 1499 107.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.28
16 1988 1947 151.0 — — — — -47 -156 -175 68.2% +1.45 5–1 (83%) 0–4 (0%) 103.5 -2.13 1988 1474 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.83 — 0–1 — -0.09
17 1989 1986 162.4 — — — — -24 -108 -155 63.2% +1.20 9–3 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 104.1 -2.80 1989 1613 134.5 — — — — +25 -50 — 53.7% +0.44 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 98.2 -0.13
18 1990 2126 168.3 — — — — +40 -229 -238 79.2% +2.17 7–2 (78%) 4–0 (100%) 107.8 +0.66 1990 1699 117.8 — — — — +9 -144 -151 50.7% -0.39 3–4 (43%) 6–3 (67%) 101.4 +0.78
19 1991 2063 164.9 — — — — +20 -103 -62 69.6% +1.53 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 97.9 -0.78 1991 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — — 50.0% +0.14 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 +0.02
20 1992 2121 171.9 — — — — +33 -59 -48 69.4% +1.32 11–2 (85%) 6–5 (55%) 106.9 -1.97 1992 1713 141.0 — — — — +46 -149 -169 55.3% +0.62 6–7 (46%) 3–7 (30%) 96.0 -0.20
21 1993 2058 164.0 — — — — +1 +127 -28 66.1% +1.05 11–4 (73%) 9–3 (75%) 105.3 +0.67 1993 1871 140.9 — — — — +13 -238 -251 57.3% +0.49 12–3 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 112.5 +1.62
22 1994 1977 147.9 — — — — +8 +146 +2 66.2% +0.96 6–5 (55%) 6–2 (75%) 99.6 +0.06 1994 1771 141.0 — — — — +49 -194 — 47.7% +0.03 6–8 (43%) 3–7 (30%) 94.6 -1.33
23 1995 2039 159.3 — — — — +38 -7 -10 64.8% +1.11 10–1 (91%) 4–3 (57%) 107.6 -0.51 1995 1695 122.1 — — — — +28 -71 — 42.9% -0.67 4–3 (57%) 1–1 — -1.63
24 1996 1935 158.7 — — — — -4 +81 +198 61.9% +1.09 7–0 (100%) 2–6 (25%) 103.3 -1.36 1996 1692 115.6 — — — — +46 -114 -98 40.7% -0.81 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.11
25 1997 1990 164.4 — — — — +18 +53 +117 66.9% +1.20 10–5 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 -1.63 1997 1670 103.1 — — — — +44 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 — — +0.18
26 1998 1935 150.6 — — — — +21 — — 50.0% -0.03 3–1 (75%) 4–2 (67%) 101.7 -1.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1999 1902 152.1 — — — — -1 +93 — 56.5% +0.72 6–5 (55%) 1–6 (14%) 93.5 -2.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 1881 102.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2197 168.6 — — — — +6 -13 -56 64.9% +1.15 100–45 (69%) 53–48 (52%) 107.6 -4.04 — 1882 138.9 — — — — +29 -146 -165 49.9% +0.01 39–32 (55%) 19–27 (41%) 101.4 -0.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.