H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mary Joe Fernandez vs Stephanie Rehe H2H: 2-1
Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 2–1 lead over Stephanie Rehe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Mary Joe Fernandez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1990 Manhattan Beach quarterfinal 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 1990* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Mary Joe Fernandez | 7-5 6-2 | Stephanie Rehe | Match data |
| May 28, 1987* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Stephanie Rehe | 7-6(4) 1-6 6-4 | Mary Joe Fernandez | Match data |
| Apr 16, 1986* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Mary Joe Fernandez | 5-7 6-3 6-1 | Stephanie Rehe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Joe Fernandez | #136 | #4 | 2,114 | 2,191 | 409 | 192 | 68.1% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| Stephanie Rehe | #156 | #10 | 60 | 2,000 | 134 | 98 | 57.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Joe Fernandez | Stephanie Rehe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | 1985 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | 1986 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #27 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #182 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1987 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #20 | 1,895 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #18 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 1988 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #19 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1989 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,977 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 17–8 | 68.0% | #28 | 1,868 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1990 | 40–10 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 1991 | 47–18 | 72.3% | #8 | 2,062 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,108 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,968 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1993 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #7 | 2,054 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #123 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1994 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #14 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #74 | 1,744 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1995 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #8 | 2,038 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #156 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1996 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #16 | 1,926 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1997 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #10 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1998 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,932 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1999 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #38 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,869 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |