H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Mary Lou Piatek vs Andrea Leand H2H: 3-1
Mary Lou Piatek holds a 3–1 lead over Andrea Leand in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mary Lou Piatek leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mary Lou Piatek won the 1989 Washington third round 6-4 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 1989 | Washington | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Mary Lou Piatek | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Andrea Leand | Match data |
| Jan 12, 1984* | Hershey | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Mary Lou Piatek | 7-6 5-7 7-5 | Andrea Leand | Match data |
| Jan 3, 1983 | Washington | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Mary Lou Piatek | 4-6 6-1 6-3 | Andrea Leand | Match data |
| Oct 14, 1982* | Tampa | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Andrea Leand | 6-4 6-1 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Andrea Leand | #857 | #27 | 13 | 1,883 | 83 | 104 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Andrea Leand | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 29–22 | 56.9% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #35 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #33 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #152 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #142 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #180 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,473 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |