H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Mary Lou Piatek vs Andrea Temesvari H2H: 0-2

Andrea Temesvari holds a 2–0 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrea Temesvari leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrea Temesvari won the 1993 Indian Wells Open round of 64 6-7 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Lou Piatek
USA
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Andrea Temesvari
HUN Age 60 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Temesvari #69 6-7 7-5 6-3 Mary Lou Piatek Match data Feb 22, 1993 R64 Indian Wells Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Andrea Temesvari 6-2 6-1 Mary Lou Piatek Match data Jan 24, 1983* R64 Marco Island WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mary Lou Piatek — — — 1,938 157 207 43.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Andrea Temesvari — #7 109 2,022 185 179 50.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Mary Lou Piatek Andrea Temesvari
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0 1981 11–6 64.7% — 1,624 0 1
1979 3–5 37.5% — 1,547 0 0 1982 18–14 56.2% — 1,771 0 1
1980 20–13 60.6% — 1,762 0 0 1983 42–15 73.7% — 1,990 0 4
1981 30–22 57.7% — 1,874 0 1 1984 24–16 60.0% #14 1,889 0 4
1982 18–21 46.2% — 1,793 0 1 1985 18–12 60.0% #16 1,849 0 5
1983 12–20 37.5% — 1,721 0 1 1986 11–12 47.8% #43 1,802 0 5
1984 18–20 47.4% — 1,704 0 2 1987 1–2 33.3% — 1,776 0 5
1985 14–18 43.8% — 1,678 0 2 1989 18–15 54.5% #43 1,750 0 5
1986 8–15 34.8% — 1,618 0 2 1990 8–19 29.6% #117 1,612 0 5
1987 6–12 33.3% — 1,594 0 2 1991 6–14 30.0% #159 1,542 0 5
1988 6–16 27.3% — 1,542 0 2 1992 11–12 47.8% #70 1,607 0 5
1989 7–15 31.8% — 1,592 0 2 1993 5–20 20.0% #153 1,475 0 5
1990 8–11 42.1% — 1,611 0 2 1994 2–7 22.2% #133 1,476 0 5
1991 5–8 38.5% — 1,629 0 2 1995 6–8 42.9% #90 1,485 0 5
1992 1–8 11.1% — 1,560 0 2 1996 4–6 40.0% #181 1,532 0 5
1993 1–2 33.3% — 1,554 0 2 1997 0–1 0.0% #940 1,529 0 5

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Mary Lou Piatek Andrea Temesvari
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1978 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
1979 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
1980 5 3 8 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1983 2 2 4 50.0% 29 5 34 85.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3%
1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1984 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4%
1982 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 13 11 24 54.2% 1985 7 3 10 70.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
1983 5 6 11 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
1984 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1985 7 11 18 38.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1989 9 7 16 56.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1986 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 1990 1 7 8 12.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
1987 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
1988 4 9 13 30.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 4 4 8 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
1989 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 3 9 12 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
1990 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1991 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1992 0 6 6 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career 75 85 160 46.9% 17 32 49 34.7% 12 29 41 29.3% 53 61 114 46.5% Career 44 57 101 43.6% 89 62 151 58.9% 15 15 30 50.0% 26 43 69 37.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Mary Lou Piatek Andrea Temesvari
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1978 1499 106.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.11 1981 1624 130.8 — — — — — — — 60.5% +0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — -0.16
1979 1547 118.3 — — — — +98 — — 42.1% -0.89 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.12 1982 1772 146.5 — — — — -152 -31 -162 59.2% +0.69 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -3.02
1980 1763 137.4 — — — — +9 -186 — 57.7% +0.61 4–3 (57%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.65 1983 1990 163.1 — — — — -215 +103 -366 75.4% +2.16 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.7 +1.39
1981 1875 146.3 — — — — +65 -198 -301 56.7% +0.48 8–10 (44%) 6–5 (55%) 100.9 -2.75 1984 1890 136.6 — — — — -79 +109 -174 61.2% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 105.4 +3.45
1982 1794 142.2 — — — — +59 -196 -212 47.1% -0.08 4–5 (44%) 2–3 (40%) 96.6 -0.89 1985 1849 136.5 — — — — -48 +129 — 61.5% +0.86 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 95.7 +1.41
1983 1722 143.9 — — — — +55 -87 — 41.3% -0.43 4–7 (36%) 0–5 (0%) 91.3 -4.11 1986 1802 139.5 — — — — -39 +157 — 55.1% +0.29 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 94.1 -0.74
1984 1704 128.6 — — — — -14 — -70 47.7% -0.47 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 100.9 -0.88 1987 1776 105.3 — — — — -39 — — 42.9% -1.29 0–1 — — -0.17
1985 1678 113.9 — — — — -28 -65 -67 43.1% -0.61 5–3 (63%) 1–3 (25%) 100.7 +1.98 1989 1751 135.3 — — — — -31 +153 — 50.0% -0.01 7–3 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 102.1 -0.31
1986 1619 111.1 — — — — +10 — -25 38.5% -0.67 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.5 +1.45 1990 1612 121.4 — — — — +9 +190 — 34.5% -1.48 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.1 +0.21
1987 1595 117.3 — — — — +33 — — 35.7% -0.78 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.12 1991 1542 110.6 — — — — +7 +224 +66 36.4% -1.34 0–4 (0%) 1–4 (20%) 92.0 +0.26
1988 1543 116.2 — — — — +33 -44 — 30.8% -1.31 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — -0.58 1992 1608 122.1 — — — — -5 +81 +64 41.5% -0.70 7–2 (78%) 3–3 (50%) 106.9 +0.26
1989 1593 121.4 — — — — +35 -117 — 31.4% -1.65 5–2 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 107.3 -2.73 1993 1476 111.1 — — — — +32 +134 — 28.8% -1.37 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 97.7 +0.66
1990 1612 125.3 — — — — +7 -86 — 43.9% -0.63 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.44 1994 1477 113.1 — — — — +1 +154 — 27.8% -1.83 1–1 — — -0.25
1991 1630 119.5 — — — — +17 — — 41.4% -0.31 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.69 1995 1486 104.7 — — — — -22 +124 — 43.8% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.7 +1.71
1992 1560 101.4 — — — — -16 — — 23.8% -2.00 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — -0.39 1996 1532 128.1 — — — — — +113 — 45.5% -0.36 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.42
1993 1555 103.2 — — — — -21 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 1–0 — -0.16 1997 1529 108.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.29
Career 1938 136.6 — — — — +26 -129 -156 44.3% -0.42 47–56 (46%) 21–34 (38%) 92.7 -2.59 Career 2022 143.4 — — — — -57 +117 -111 52.6% +0.18 42–48 (47%) 33–38 (46%) 97.5 +1.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.