H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Mary Lou Piatek vs Andrea Temesvari H2H: 0-2
Andrea Temesvari holds a 2–0 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrea Temesvari leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrea Temesvari won the 1993 Indian Wells second round 6-7 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 60
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 1993* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Andrea Temesvari | 6-7 7-5 6-3 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Jan 24, 1983* | Marco Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Andrea Temesvari | 6-2 6-1 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Andrea Temesvari | #932 | #7 | 109 | 2,021 | 185 | 178 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Andrea Temesvari | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 42–15 | 73.7% | — | 1,988 | 0 | 4 |
| 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 5 |
| 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,762 | 0 | 5 |
| 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #43 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 |
| 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 |
| 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 |
| 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,616 | 0 | 5 |
| 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,487 | 0 | 5 |
| 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #181 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 |
| 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #940 | 1,533 | 0 | 5 |