H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Mary Lou Piatek vs Beth Herr H2H: 1-4
Beth Herr holds a 4–1 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Beth Herr leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Mary Lou Piatek leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Beth Herr won the 1988 US Open first round 6-3 1-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1988* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Beth Herr | 6-3 1-6 6-2 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Sep 27, 1986* | Tulsa | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Beth Herr | 6-2 6-2 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Sep 27, 1984* | New Orleans | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mary Lou Piatek | 6-4 7-5 | Beth Herr | Match data |
| Oct 13, 1983* | Tampa | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Beth Herr | 7-5 7-5 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Jun 15, 1983* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Beth Herr | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Beth Herr | #424 | #31 | 18 | 1,784 | 107 | 128 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Beth Herr | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #39 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #47 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #52 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #126 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #98 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #132 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |